From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688E2C433E0 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22A5264E02 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:49:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 22A5264E02 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=68JmU1fhDFr8ri6fByhEAbOtQYhwTcq43rEFfF6t3bE=; b=U/9x3tmVpSQRYE9IIAqkv1u8W FbH270dKTmu5x9f7Dm1vdXw3qHdJrWEWkJZOStT68N5kXjukNFgdI/4w8puBzQgpanG54EO0LZuAF U1d33Qkzav104E7FAD/yWTqYtMbCQcEUmNUHAh6S18Tpn3zA4NoY5PMwjLBtKttDk23ldXsPDzObg M6htAiva9hrVQ/ks160qlQM9TjabkKlo0SEYYF85nqiaqcOyi17cpSOYBb/cFkKc8MtUmxintyK/K X3vOG+Ra2Cp1zU6wVY7FZTn1or0PRApv2bNIqXMk1bZs9uSHIt3u7x4d2oH47BQlNpjYcieNfgXkx 9mqx8pVxw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lC1dV-0003PT-0C; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:47:33 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lC1dS-0003Ou-3q for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:47:31 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD9931B; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 06:47:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.110] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B64413F694; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 06:47:20 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 15/21] vfio: Refactor ioport trap handler To: Andre Przywara , Will Deacon , Julien Thierry References: <20201210142908.169597-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20201210142908.169597-16-andre.przywara@arm.com> From: Alexandru Elisei Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:47:31 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201210142908.169597-16-andre.przywara@arm.com> Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210216_094730_276554_4ED19734 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.96 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marc Zyngier , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Andre, Looks good, one nitpick below. On 12/10/20 2:29 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: > With the planned retirement of the special ioport emulation code, we > need to provide an emulation function compatible with the MMIO prototype. > > Adjust the I/O port trap handler to use that new function, and provide > shims to implement the old ioport interface, for now. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > --- > vfio/core.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/vfio/core.c b/vfio/core.c > index 0b45e78b..f55f1f87 100644 > --- a/vfio/core.c > +++ b/vfio/core.c > @@ -81,15 +81,12 @@ out_free_buf: > return ret; > } > > -static bool vfio_ioport_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, > - u16 port, void *data, int len) > +static bool _vfio_ioport_in(struct vfio_region *region, u32 offset, > + void *data, int len) > { > - u32 val; > - ssize_t nr; > - struct vfio_region *region = ioport->priv; > struct vfio_device *vdev = region->vdev; > - > - u32 offset = port - region->port_base; > + ssize_t nr; > + u32 val; > > if (!(region->info.flags & VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_READ)) > return false; > @@ -97,7 +94,7 @@ static bool vfio_ioport_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, > nr = pread(vdev->fd, &val, len, region->info.offset + offset); > if (nr != len) { > vfio_dev_err(vdev, "could not read %d bytes from I/O port 0x%x\n", > - len, port); > + len, offset); To keep things functionally identical, shouldn't that be offset + region->port_base? I think it's easier to identify the device when we have the PCI ioport address. Thanks, Alex > return false; > } > > @@ -118,15 +115,13 @@ static bool vfio_ioport_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, > return true; > } > > -static bool vfio_ioport_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, > - u16 port, void *data, int len) > +static bool _vfio_ioport_out(struct vfio_region *region, u32 offset, > + void *data, int len) > { > - u32 val; > - ssize_t nr; > - struct vfio_region *region = ioport->priv; > struct vfio_device *vdev = region->vdev; > + ssize_t nr; > + u32 val; > > - u32 offset = port - region->port_base; > > if (!(region->info.flags & VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_WRITE)) > return false; > @@ -148,11 +143,37 @@ static bool vfio_ioport_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, > nr = pwrite(vdev->fd, &val, len, region->info.offset + offset); > if (nr != len) > vfio_dev_err(vdev, "could not write %d bytes to I/O port 0x%x", > - len, port); > + len, offset); > > return nr == len; > } > > +static void vfio_ioport_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, u32 len, > + u8 is_write, void *ptr) > +{ > + struct vfio_region *region = ptr; > + u32 offset = addr - region->port_base; > + > + if (is_write) > + _vfio_ioport_out(region, offset, data, len); > + else > + _vfio_ioport_in(region, offset, data, len); > +} > + > +static bool vfio_ioport_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, > + u16 port, void *data, int len) > +{ > + vfio_ioport_mmio(vcpu, port, data, len, true, ioport->priv); > + return true; > +} > + > +static bool vfio_ioport_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, > + u16 port, void *data, int len) > +{ > + vfio_ioport_mmio(vcpu, port, data, len, false, ioport->priv); > + return true; > +} > + > static struct ioport_operations vfio_ioport_ops = { > .io_in = vfio_ioport_in, > .io_out = vfio_ioport_out, _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel