From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C9AC4CEC9 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A41F22053B for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="f5zn9bRl"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="omYgqw8v" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A41F22053B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=roeck-us.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=o+NmHIbKliTkFyilFyNh5PQQGnhNMKNcTzI1tMCH9cc=; b=f5zn9bRlRNrv3560kO5JNQzJs rKV+fUbQV2dJ0i/p0ael40XR6sQ5CiBUNWQNhwsIZootVk89+0q+C67+mBHId48raKk4rngagJhCH IQ7OkBi/qM3U9v4Cqjvkh9KP5jHXoyP6+Chnma1/kDUBdHIMsIFZ9spP7vvbofJxu/w18fgB6TTUu Z3cLoByZxoi04aufhE1P7UAQ2+JDVrNKY+yvaOw1hDpn9HbVJPkGqoOHo20M1mh/f/BTeNDHCR+ah wfATm/0MyMWAwpEkXHD1Qh3Yw6guWjcugq+mM+WtH37At4lCOA34JeP9nW7cPLY1YEnoYd3HrQTZO BCW9aAOQw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iADBK-000899-9X; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:06:10 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-x544.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::544]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iADBG-00088N-6I for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:06:08 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-x544.google.com with SMTP id x10so2004942pgi.5 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:06:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WXjXRRZVUtfs/NBrDnZYybzMPZ6/z0w4LM5WT5/NCRQ=; b=omYgqw8vdfnj/BCBVa1dOTzudnQP5nkVtJFH3xIKULtQccr7vaMsLTP7PJXl9Q2zl3 7D24zqIl32IA95y/AwPX+xT2g4nafqjDlKqfLWxr/+VyincN0GvtdSZpsPecKJzhwJ4L CADxDXeu2PDy9N69XBQxGxEM+3gU1iQNPQ9HAyJVzwC9lnvz8M6g7L4OggQqcKIzz0ux fmHTBVxd5RUs6ly2//g4N2DGKTobnrs7Nlv3MlriISjsPoXgwGNHY35Lq0sqb4kxBjD+ 7oE94QLYmWCIbkpJ0FrM60EtPxDoTuZPda3RiU5HaTf0E/H1N4mrmHqOeEFQcNBc3phG /38Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WXjXRRZVUtfs/NBrDnZYybzMPZ6/z0w4LM5WT5/NCRQ=; b=MwrWE6KzKDx6zodijVcgcTO3gTXP0MUxPP1lBUy5EzcZG5zm6V2sMKkv9xfMscTDDr Zzkzc8cRnEaNlvZR1lQaJZMvO4d7xCLw4Ju3HxSeO8EevkQf02R2e6wRh710MzCD4ujO Atra+dlVTOPDARB9hSHQGQ3lFgY6hTl6sg1/p0a6gNeI7orfophIDWD1j3pPZrWKUlvz JN2ywc3nEtUWPPR6DVqVxJYNMnhwMuGyKXZXwrO4//l4P7SiyxFmVtw3rBt+i/QVZuPy yN7jqDgYgHN+rEHMJAmG7W7VjxJUao/wNPKpblwABs/2RMH8tFBlMTPxg0135/OsJSSX z2ww== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWSAlJbWrTcHRRx1CCGg9rIFvhH9zoybhryXLB68L83xXDP8cVJ VRux/N0PXCvG9k1YtzI7nybQZVlC X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxAxKAlWk/RgxHRu6VyLU4cD/6/OLBd2BUHkdqZBaygYNSzcKt+lb4z/NdiZOCfXU7nPVITJw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:3450:: with SMTP id o74mr4938289pjb.5.1568725564878; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v68sm4023845pfv.47.2019.09.17.06.06.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:06:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM, arm64: Remove arm_pm_restart() To: Arnd Bergmann , Thierry Reding References: <20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <20190914152544.GA17499@roeck-us.net> <056ccf5c-6c6c-090b-6ca1-ab666021db48@roeck-us.net> <20190916134920.GA18267@ulmo> <20190916154336.GA6628@roeck-us.net> <20190916155031.GE7488@ulmo> <20190916202809.GA42800@mithrandir> From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:06:00 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190917_060606_243722_69BA4812 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.95 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux ARM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 9/17/19 12:01 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:28 PM Thierry Reding > wrote: >> >> All of the patches beyond the 6 in this set rely on the system reset and >> power "framework". I don't think there was broad concensus on that idea >> yet. > > Ok, I see. > >> If you think it's worth another try I'm happy to send the patches >> out again. > > Maybe do that after we pull the first set into arm-soc then. If > we can reach consensus, I can merge them as a follow-up, > either through the soc tree as a new subsystem or through > the asm-generic tree as cross-architecture work. > I'd suggest to keep the two patch sets separate, though, and apply the 6 system reset patches either way. Thanks, Guenter _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel