From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C43C433E0 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 17:18:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 300B0207FC for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 17:18:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="NrpoHfFz"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="x0RkUV/r" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 300B0207FC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=UY+x2dhh+tZsQi7YsgxOF/HYR+bNoWa0XpYDyPl1XrQ=; b=NrpoHfFzYOqRriHemR4gdFW65 /mc10od6OT4Cy7U/KxZsGScgbMzDc++/wm3aK5vX2OL6evU6gJNE+i28pR6OOFf1ofAkjocG+Zto3 jCw+YLv3lL/6sT+n15mvTw3BVgwOu4armzMLexBDbgMIl1yjqmxCCESEc8GUBoSkNP6wW+RUg3E7z kWeHYTEbkD7WQSTU/HCMZqkat7+EZAR60WcodYyTxWErGNcgXJV8SpvuvVgxckTpDRwfhdIlOGo4J GJS0TicD6qB+ohbTyihQ1gpBhHo87Z9OYjNa9LlE80z6DxtmX2Tnjnor5CbidLn/1R/XaJFPgVK4p 3WznBDikg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k30Ya-0008Tl-4n; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 17:16:56 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k30YY-0008T5-0H for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 17:16:55 +0000 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 074HGcUE017655; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:16:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1596561398; bh=s4QwW87FIT9eU/zMHPowJVYmJ/Pi9b3VcwxtqOW2ZJ0=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=x0RkUV/rlHaQcXUVRxzf8TGkA6AeAqROo+N2j9a6PBV9CxuexS7xcuTgqCCfBlctL za2+9aVfu/7IzcjHmdQeGC2hwVsDqWEQ46lAK6byA0ymueVtYPM0v89YVLhoLBiIXm 2D+RQdaxwYT8NOKVtQbRr2rXO2mjkVd16P5FCP8o= Received: from DFLE109.ent.ti.com (dfle109.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.30]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 074HGcWg095725 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:16:38 -0500 Received: from DFLE112.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.33) by DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:16:38 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE112.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:16:38 -0500 Received: from [10.24.69.20] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 074HGWNQ120907; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:16:34 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] irqchip: ti, sci-intr/inta: Update the dt bindings to accept different interrupt parents To: Sekhar Nori , Rob Herring , Suman Anna References: <20200728051735.6187-1-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200731181658.GA500828@bogus> <733bbcdc-8d29-51cc-f16e-7f95abb56ff2@ti.com> <20200731205953.GA774358@bogus> <051cd3d8-a52a-bdad-c4e8-7a05251fab33@ti.com> From: Lokesh Vutla Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 22:46:32 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <051cd3d8-a52a-bdad-c4e8-7a05251fab33@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200804_131654_178243_1774BAB5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 25.93 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Nishanth Menon , Peter Ujfalusi , Grygorii Strashko , Device Tree Mailing List , Marc Zyngier , Bjorn Andersson , Tero Kristo , Santosh Shilimkar , Thomas Gleixner , Linux ARM Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi All, On 02/08/20 4:04 pm, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On 8/1/20 2:29 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 01:24:17PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote: >>> On 7/31/20 1:16 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 06:01:50PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>>>> On 2020-07-28 06:17, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>>>>> Hi Marc, >>>>>> This is continuation of the RFC patches[0] regarding the driver >>>>>> updates to support for following interrupt parent connection: >>>>>> - INTR -> INTR >>>>>> - INTA -> GICv3 >>>>>> The current existing driver assumes that INTR is always connected to >>>>>> GICv3 and INTA is always connected to INTR. >>>>> >>>>> I'm OK to take this if I can get an Ack from RobH on the three >>>>> DT patches that still need it. >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring >>>> >>>> However, there's a dependency on >>>> bindings/arm/keystone/ti,k3-sci-common.yaml. >>>> >>>> That's a dependency on this being merged. I don't care if it breaks in >>>> your tree, but I care for -next and Linus' tree. There could also be >>>> other 'make dt_bindings_check' failures/warnings with this as the above >>>> dependency prevents further testing. >>>> >>> >>> Bjorn did pick up the above common binding file through the remoteproc tree, >>> and it is available in -next. That said, I donno the merge order between >>> remoteproc and irq subsystem trees into -next, and if that is a concern. >> >> I'm less concerned about merge order at this point. -rc1 not being >> broken is the low bar I have... > > Looking at Bjorn's remoteproc tree[0], the common bindings patch is > applied on top of other (unrelated) remoteproc patches, so merging it > into Marc's tree is out of question unless Bjorn is willing to re-write > his tree (probably not). > > The other option would be for Marc/Thomas to add these patches into a > 'late' branch, to be sent to Linus after Bjorn's tree has been merged. > Bjorn could help by sending his pull request early and someone from TI > can keep an eye out for when its safe to merge. What can we do to take this forward? Once this series is merged, DT changes should also be merged. Else DMA will be broken as DT backward compatibility is broken. Thanks and regards, Lokesh _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel