From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4F0C433F5 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:30:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBEB3610EA for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:30:35 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org CBEB3610EA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=HbVvxsOnqny+DXzG+5kmdyZsJLj/HJy/MgKm84nACXE=; b=kWeQ3nZhe+++0F3c1pi3xnR5lO gIiXVI75dqemDkZ9t+vMZ72JTlKrbevw7w1MAijPA0Uu753XheKIgLQ8YHh3LOMfvMpfgg/607o5F I0mSVKf5M6F35ubuvr1SSXiNwR81nBm2Iix0LW9WqeJ5M8LeHASnCA8vghS+Gc0MW5wwYZmGXWfNz RJakch2ZgOSoM2BFvE5Shkw7nB1LbXO2SO/an+DRZnm5A1o3vHnkFPmaTa6f8V4e5GtMMo/2XjcBz 4BkRDcn/Zhk4gkMikg1Oh9ZAVzzM5TdoFdudIgufuNX0A3zX776eraWP8YWquTGUd+xF3UWK6Mp87 CtU1Ay/g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mdXCF-007UPr-Qj; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:29:24 +0000 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mdXCB-007UOb-S4 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:29:21 +0000 Received: from [192.168.254.32] (unknown [47.187.212.181]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 914CC20B7179; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 05:29:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 914CC20B7179 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1634819359; bh=vnC52vGFMLBLl3prkclKdto+trnf1OP2GsHX/iOjU18=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=dNicFdwSp0Ixk5DbjvSpgipfh2GsYA8xPXZ8PTPF9gjJntyDoxmuNF8tqjonpFuZs fQx6t9/IQrfTa6jOq7hSPTOPKLvgRZR+3fVvekqoncDvLAbwf013zC3RZvbcXaFy61 Y27mVzSCMAuVWUFeGGc5zByyBFB+Y8yqy8mvCMvA= Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 04/11] arm64: Make return_address() use arch_stack_walk() To: Mark Brown Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com, sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20211015025847.17694-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> <20211015025847.17694-5-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:29:18 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211021_052919_990909_D606E3C9 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.57 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Thanks. On 10/20/21 10:03 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 09:58:40PM -0500, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote: >> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" >> >> Currently, return_address() in ARM64 code walks the stack using >> start_backtrace() and walk_stackframe(). Make it use arch_stack_walk() >> instead. This makes maintenance easier. > > Reviewed-by: Mark Brown > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel