From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC13C433DF for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C789206DC for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="OMZTQy2D" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3C789206DC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type:Cc: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=x5gVXgK8pznI+xUjDt7Z3EBdW2WMu611YLzDg7gYbx4=; b=OMZTQy2DyyCg4Azu6xSamTMA1 owWR7lBBbwxGBM5j9ebsqy62sFxEFx9KGUWdGoGfnMCZRD2kn+Lo9hpBfE8RIwxAdNPe/J3bBFvTI ULVyT6R28yPR0AULjWk/E/6wU9fiatA39ChpTNztfOjDJmD/U5OtdVqmrb1SfwJqsOC+R3qk2EJOl A+y1rPrZasMFDHF7EtAES/pg1wthCUj22qZBG8sLgIU0Ut3KejsSb4AFPywdpDALJTLVUMJb+wgqH HtVmKN8cMQufIrdlaZ9ahBW2Sv5N/x8A8H7DVaPtzfaQloDO7QZoqlXn/VIFGJgixKzcPXufockWR OVSOgF4Kw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jhC67-0003iD-Ri; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 13:09:23 +0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jhC64-0003hP-PS; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 13:09:22 +0000 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9086EACAE; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Add an enum for the firmware clocks From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne To: Maxime Ripard Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 15:09:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200605_060921_123237_FAE2D5EF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.46 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tim Gover , Dave Stevenson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Phil Elwell , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4463655814904807483==" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --===============4463655814904807483== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zBa+R9/+djnaoJfqzPmm" --=-zBa+R9/+djnaoJfqzPmm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Maxime, On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 14:04 +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 17:45 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > While the firmware allows us to discover the available clocks, we need = to > > discriminate those clocks to only register the ones meaningful to Linux= . > > The firmware also doesn't provide a clock name, so having a list of the= ID > > will help us to give clocks a proper name later on. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard > > --- > > drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >=20 > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk- > > raspberrypi.c > > index 5f4e2d49432f..eebd16040f8a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c > > @@ -18,7 +18,23 @@ > > =20 > > #include > > =20 > > -#define RPI_FIRMWARE_ARM_CLK_ID 0x00000003 > > +enum rpi_firmware_clk_id { > > + RPI_FIRMWARE_EMMC_CLK_ID =3D 1, > > + RPI_FIRMWARE_UART_CLK_ID, > > + RPI_FIRMWARE_ARM_CLK_ID, > > + RPI_FIRMWARE_CORE_CLK_ID, > > + RPI_FIRMWARE_V3D_CLK_ID, > > + RPI_FIRMWARE_H264_CLK_ID, > > + RPI_FIRMWARE_ISP_CLK_ID, > > + RPI_FIRMWARE_SDRAM_CLK_ID, > > + RPI_FIRMWARE_PIXEL_CLK_ID, > > + RPI_FIRMWARE_PWM_CLK_ID, > > + RPI_FIRMWARE_HEVC_CLK_ID, > > + RPI_FIRMWARE_EMMC2_CLK_ID, > > + RPI_FIRMWARE_M2MC_CLK_ID, > > + RPI_FIRMWARE_PIXEL_BVB_CLK_ID, > > + RPI_FIRMWARE_NUM_CLK_ID, > > +}; > > =20 > > #define RPI_FIRMWARE_STATE_ENABLE_BIT BIT(0) > > #define RPI_FIRMWARE_STATE_WAIT_BIT BIT(1) > > @@ -31,8 +47,6 @@ > > =20 > > #define A2W_PLL_FRAC_BITS 20 > > =20 > > -#define NUM_FW_CLKS 16 > > - > > struct raspberrypi_clk { > > struct device *dev; > > struct rpi_firmware *firmware; > > @@ -320,7 +334,8 @@ static int raspberrypi_clk_probe(struct platform_de= vice > > *pdev) > > rpi->firmware =3D firmware; > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rpi); > > =20 > > - clk_data =3D devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(clk_data, hws, NUM_FW_CLKS= ), > > + clk_data =3D devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(clk_data, hws, > > + RPI_FIRMWARE_NUM_CLK_ID), >=20 > nit: you're allocating one structure too many right? Nevermind this comment, as pointed out privately by Phil Elwell, I forgot t= he firmware clk description structure starts at 0. So we need to make space fo= r that. It would maybe make sense to add RPI_FIRMWARE_RESERVED_CLK_ID above the EMM= C clk entry. Although it's just a suggestion. > Acked-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne >=20 > Regards, > Nicolas >=20 --=-zBa+R9/+djnaoJfqzPmm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEErOkkGDHCg2EbPcGjlfZmHno8x/4FAl7aQ/sACgkQlfZmHno8 x/51JAf9E6hIeONQ04AS5nc+CNgytiK5+f+O/3DL9v+pjoI2tV+K+vFz6xZmgfML ktmejzaCEWThKJfmvNTZutm1MHnBSyXO3osOufF3MIo88zjTj0gZgX3Ls2TinE6N urPDhetiInbD3Ysl5Buz7KyvIiPWin6H4l5EkPED5hnbftQ8H3WMR8CEknV5BWvM 9NjTmnYfpFpLnCzbV6i2MLPgOXOQ1DHbj7+JIen0Bpt3nOyAs2JTTfIC8jyxG3HS lEJ1dJiR1Hzw/z0yvysAeYrtUHqDJsgU2Sfj4Mp9ysOB/yzFfKoWBJiJQZaQaShL Nx5mzSj0jK3TXqxDEwkeOuaYNoBn6w== =FpmO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-zBa+R9/+djnaoJfqzPmm-- --===============4463655814904807483== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel --===============4463655814904807483==--