From: Hans de Goede <email@example.com> To: Daniel Scally <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <email@example.com>, Andy Shevchenko <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Wolfram Sang <email@example.com>, Lee Jones <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Maximilian Luz <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org Cc: Len Brown <email@example.com>, Mika Westerberg <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Russell King <email@example.com>, Linus Walleij <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <email@example.com>, Mark Gross <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Robert Moore <email@example.com>, Erik Kaneda <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Introduce intel_skl_int3472 module Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 15:10:34 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Hi Daniel, On 5/20/21 4:09 PM, Daniel Scally wrote: > Hello all > > Apologies for the long delay since the last version of this series; the time I > had free to work on it became somewhat restrained. No worries, thank you for all the work you are putting into this. I have not taken a close look at the code yet, but I see that Andy has and the amount of remarks which he has on patch 7/8 which is the big one seems to be limited, so I believe that we are getting close to this being ready for merging. This touches a lot of subsystems, so we need to come up with a plan to merge this. Here is my proposal for how to do this: 1/8 ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list() 2/8 ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of acpi device 3/8 i2c: core: Add a format macro for I2C device names 4/8 gpiolib: acpi: Export acpi_get_gpiod() 5/8 clkdev: Make clkdev_drop() null aware 6/8 gpiolib: acpi: Add acpi_gpio_get_io_resource() 7/8 platform/x86: Add intel_skl_int3472 driver 8/8 mfd: tps68470: Remove tps68470 MFD driver Rafael already indicated that he wants to merge 1/8 (and presumably also 2/8) through his tree and that he will provide an immutable branch with those for merging into the pdx86 tree. 4/8 and 6/8 are both gpiolib-acpi patches and seem to be ready for merging now, perhaps the gpiolib-acpi maintainers can already merge these and also provide an immutable branch ? Andy/Mika ? 3/8 and 5/8 seem to be nice cleanups, but not really necessary. IMHO it would be best to park these cleanups for later and for 3/8 add the following where necessary for now: /* FIXME drop this once the I2C_DEV_NAME_FORMAT macro has been added to include/linux/i2c.h */ #ifndef I2C_DEV_NAME_FORMAT #define I2C_DEV_NAME_FORMAT "i2c-%s" #endif This is not the prettiest but it reduces all the subsys cross-deps and things like this have been done before for similar reasons. Likewise it would be good if you can add if (foo) as condition before any clkdev_drop(foo) calls in this patch-set and then merge 5/8 "clkdev: Make clkdev_drop() null aware" independently of this and then once both are in Linux tree follow-up with a cleanup patch dropping the if (foo) guards. So this would leave as deps for 7/8 just the 2 ACPI and 2 gpiolib-acpi patches which I can hopefully pull-in via immutable branches and then we are good. AFAICT patch 8/8 can be merged independently once 7/8 hits for-next (IOW once we are sure the next kernel will have 7/8). Or alternatively one of the involved subsys maintainers just merges the entire set (once it is ready) and then provides an immutable branch with the entire set on top of 5.13-rc1 (or 5.14-rc1). But that requires acks from all the other subsys maintainers. Note I'm fine with either approach. Regards, Hans > v1 for this series was originally 14-18 of this series: > https://email@example.com/T/#m91934e12e3d033da2e768e952ea3b4a125ee3e67 > > v2 was here: > https://firstname.lastname@example.org/ > > v3 was here: > https://email@example.com/ > > Series level changelog: > > - Added patch 5/8 to make clkdev_drop() NULL aware to simplify error > handling. > - Added patch 6/8 to add acpi_gpio_get_io_resource(). > > This has been tested on a number of devices, but currently **not** on a device > designed for ChromeOS, which we ideally need to do to ensure no regression > caused by replacing the tps68470 MFD driver. Unfortunately, I don't have a > device to test it on myself. > > =========== Original Cover Letter =========== > > At the moment in the kernel the ACPI _HID INT3472 is taken by the tps68470 > MFD driver, but that driver can only handle some of the cases of that _HID > that we see. There are at least these three possibilities: > > 1. INT3472 devices that provide GPIOs through the usual framework and run > power and clocks through an operation region; this is the situation that > the current module handles and is seen on ChromeOS devices > 2. INT3472 devices that provide GPIOs, plus clocks and regulators that are > meant to be driven through the usual frameworks, usually seen on devices > designed to run Windows > 3. INT3472 devices that don't actually represent a physical tps68470, but > are being used as a convenient way of grouping a bunch of system GPIO > lines that are intended to enable power and clocks for sensors which > are called out as dependent on them. Also seen on devices designed to > run Windows. > > This series introduces a new module which registers: > > 1. An i2c driver that determines which scenario (#1 or #2) applies to the > machine and registers platform devices to be bound to GPIO, OpRegion, > clock and regulator drivers as appropriate. > 2. A platform driver that binds to the dummy INT3472 devices described in > #3 > > The platform driver for the dummy device registers the GPIO lines that > enable the clocks and regulators to the sensors via those frameworks so > that sensor drivers can consume them in the usual fashion. The existing > GPIO and OpRegion tps68470 drivers will work with the i2c driver that's > registered. Clock and regulator drivers are available but have not so far been > tested, so aren't part of this series. > > The existing mfd/tps68470.c driver being thus superseded, it is removed. > > Thanks > Dan > > Daniel Scally (8): > ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list() > ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of acpi device > i2c: core: Add a format macro for I2C device names > gpiolib: acpi: Export acpi_get_gpiod() > clkdev: Make clkdev_drop() null aware > gpiolib: acpi: Add acpi_gpio_get_io_resource() > platform/x86: Add intel_skl_int3472 driver > mfd: tps68470: Remove tps68470 MFD driver > > MAINTAINERS | 5 + > drivers/acpi/ec.c | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/pmic/Kconfig | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 107 ++++- > drivers/clk/clkdev.c | 3 + > drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 2 +- > drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 61 ++- > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 8 +- > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 4 +- > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 18 - > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 - > drivers/mfd/tps68470.c | 97 ----- > drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/core.c | 6 +- > drivers/platform/surface/surface3_power.c | 22 +- > .../platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c | 7 +- > drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig | 2 + > drivers/platform/x86/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Kconfig | 31 ++ > drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Makefile | 5 + > .../intel_skl_int3472_clk_and_regulator.c | 195 +++++++++ > .../intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.c | 106 +++++ > .../intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.h | 113 +++++ > .../intel_skl_int3472_discrete.c | 409 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../intel_skl_int3472_tps68470.c | 109 +++++ > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 8 + > include/linux/acpi.h | 11 +- > include/linux/gpio/consumer.h | 2 + > include/linux/i2c.h | 3 + > 29 files changed, 1175 insertions(+), 167 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 drivers/mfd/tps68470.c > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Kconfig > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Makefile > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_clk_and_regulator.c > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.c > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.h > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_discrete.c > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_tps68470.c > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-25 13:12 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-20 14:09 Daniel Scally 2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list() Daniel Scally 2021-05-20 17:15 ` Maximilian Luz 2021-05-20 18:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2021-05-20 21:03 ` Hans de Goede 2021-05-21 12:59 ` Andy Shevchenko 2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of acpi device Daniel Scally 2021-05-20 18:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2021-05-20 18:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2021-05-21 19:25 ` Daniel Scally 2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] i2c: core: Add a format macro for I2C device names Daniel Scally 2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] gpiolib: acpi: Export acpi_get_gpiod() Daniel Scally 2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] clkdev: Make clkdev_drop() null aware Daniel Scally 2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] gpiolib: acpi: Add acpi_gpio_get_io_resource() Daniel Scally 2021-05-21 12:05 ` Andy Shevchenko 2021-05-25 22:30 ` Daniel Scally 2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] platform/x86: Add intel_skl_int3472 driver Daniel Scally 2021-05-21 12:57 ` Andy Shevchenko 2021-05-25 22:53 ` Daniel Scally 2021-05-26 7:54 ` Andy Shevchenko 2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] mfd: tps68470: Remove tps68470 MFD driver Daniel Scally 2021-05-25 13:10 ` Hans de Goede [this message] 2021-05-25 13:12 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] Introduce intel_skl_int3472 module Hans de Goede 2021-05-25 13:23 ` Andy Shevchenko 2021-05-25 23:03 ` Daniel Scally 2021-05-26 7:55 ` Andy Shevchenko 2021-05-26 12:36 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Introduce intel_skl_int3472 module' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).