From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF28C433E2 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 03:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64BEA20684 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 03:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="FtwNQh3W"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="C3GMa/Ft" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 64BEA20684 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=tL8WXpL4VHn/AGcwZPow22XwmaCZDNKhwFAYGOvKU6s=; b=FtwNQh3WtBYevirkyMBjzrsgP BbdeKvKAMk+Yti2UDgQL8bT7PRy5Md9lpsZ7zA9Xxyj2G1w43oLDn9PTSecuc5A0lLGy220B7qfhu UD+ybLLAjWljFhhRtOoWdfM9JCuO4aRpSRLW3z709ltT2s41a/sl0z6mNJYHz9lQL+KT1pGpOhQ9t F3net8YrYLF+Y8o2F06DDtMAZfzztvq0XnfAdjyRNFmi6MpOv7c4peqVAyKMRV9iHFpyibFSyBMK3 5vxmok/QW6GOwFjGb4KfLubB1a2hNAibZlOVpMHQfV/xozhNjoqc0KQj+G0tnf6qJ5FIzogT4U0rk r2LfJWIhQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kBVMG-0007Uq-JE; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 03:47:20 +0000 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kBVME-0007UQ-13 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 03:47:19 +0000 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07S3lGj3128308; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:47:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1598586436; bh=NlZWbHSPgL38Xq9NhMRTUaqe/Y/IiioIGLVFeL4s0GI=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=C3GMa/FtLWJWm6IQOJYB4ApY//4KASCTixax0CpgnPczz6yIMcX1jscDEyGQc1nPE 8WCaOIGePQ4qWfTHUQCtmqemJlr0EJPzi7jYaE7Z07koJdjFYpEtVGV8jFNIdOLQLF 63vierzOZHkghtmtjXrtEKIOWDNrJzgFWgcDjTjs= Received: from DLEE100.ent.ti.com (dlee100.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.30]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07S3lGV9106723 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:47:16 -0500 Received: from DLEE105.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.35) by DLEE100.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:47:15 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE105.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:47:15 -0500 Received: from [10.250.69.147] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07S3lFQ7088268; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:47:15 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Convert K3 board/soc bindings to DT schema To: Lokesh Vutla , Nishanth Menon References: <20200827065144.17683-1-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200827065144.17683-2-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200828004105.givypeu3vextefc6@akan> <1c9508ce-9336-e20a-5b58-5dd257247273@ti.com> From: Suman Anna Message-ID: Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:47:15 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1c9508ce-9336-e20a-5b58-5dd257247273@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200827_234718_189012_3FFBE1A2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.03 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Device Tree Mailing List , Grygorii Strashko , Sekhar Nori , Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , Linux ARM Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Nishanth, On 8/27/20 10:14 PM, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > Hi Nishanth, > > On 28/08/20 6:11 am, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> On 12:21-20200827, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>> Convert TI K3 Board/SoC bindings to DT schema format. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla >>> --- >>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.txt | 26 ---------------- >>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml | 31 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> MAINTAINERS | 2 +- >>> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) >>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.txt >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml >> >> >> Thanks for doing this, but I have a problem with dbs_check and dtbs >> W=2 build warnings on existing dts files that this exposes further.. > > IMHO, that should not block the conversion to yaml bindings. May I know the > problem you are seeing? Agree with Lokesh here. This should neither increase or decrease the existing warnings present. FWIW, both dt_bindings_check and dtbs_check with the DT_SCHEMA_FILES set to k3.yaml is clean. And the J7200 dts files are clean even without any DT_SCHEMA_FILES specified. It is going to take sometime before the existing dtbs_check warnings are cleaned up on all the K3 dts files, and that has to do with the pre-existing bindings files in text and no yaml equivalent for them. regards Suman > >> Do you mind pulling this patch out of this j7200 series ? I would >> rather us cleanup the warnings a bit as well, and deal with yaml >> conversion seperate from j7200 bindings? > > Ill wait for Rob's view on this. He already asked to convert it during J721e > binding update. Not sure we would like to delay any further. > > Thanks and regards, > Lokesh > >> >> We will need Rob's ack anyways, I would rather we look at things >> independently. >> _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel