From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60BF9C0650E for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 14:13:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 350BD218A4 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 14:13:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="ZnzWQtUR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 350BD218A4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description :Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=gA1jAFCgcAOpWIvxuIyeoa+KBTpdeH6Kx/y/dk1m9g4=; b=ZnzWQtUR6/cuOK JwtDPr1l+pYaemzfsrc9SYIKKgGagJmJAMx5LL1H0qbdtOoTC49/JvHpeqbaKCo85kA5tCSoGpgHK hVf9+jnZyYw68kn/2WkUvR1stQduplO8MtAJ8ekzYveH9c6pMQXcXti9RXmrl9wnkxjA72WokomKV d1+IKZK4/m6nuih9g4wcMB+w6ws6BBTaajZ+12r+Gbu2M1vGUw8+lQNAeKMkel7MS+FM7/qn0NWpG W+jlZRKxFs8dEMMfpEg7MzGTb1uFvX2NwrDOMsH34gATOihrp7rm6WPbpQ4BWeH3U3CVAHm5NaFCo zqykmyLDC4wYaZ+BntIg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hig0d-00079V-LW; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 14:13:19 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hig0a-000782-BQ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 14:13:17 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED2B2B; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 07:13:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.31.185] (unknown [10.1.31.185]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F9943F718; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 07:13:09 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/59] KVM: arm64: nv: Pretend we only support larger-than-host page sizes To: Marc Zyngier , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org References: <20190621093843.220980-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20190621093843.220980-34-marc.zyngier@arm.com> From: Alexandru Elisei Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 15:13:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190621093843.220980-34-marc.zyngier@arm.com> Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190703_071316_502506_98F34B5F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.35 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Andre Przywara , Dave Martin Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 6/21/19 10:38 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > From: Jintack Lim > > Exposing memory management support to the virtual EL2 as is exposed to > the host hypervisor would make the implementation too complex and > inefficient. Therefore expose limited memory management support for the > following two cases. > > We expose same or larger page granules than the one host uses. We can > theoretically support a guest hypervisor having smaller-than-host > granularities but it is not worth it since it makes the implementation > complicated and it would waste memory. > > We expose 40 bits of physical address range to the virtual EL2, because > we only support a 40bit IPA for the guest. Eventually, this will change. > > [ This was only trapping on the 32-bit encoding, also using the > current target register value as a base for the sanitisation. > > Use as the handler for the 64-bit sysreg as well, also load the > sanitised version of the sysreg before clearing and setting bits. > > -- Andre Przywara ] > > Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > index ec34b81da936..cc994ec3c121 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > @@ -1710,6 +1710,54 @@ static bool access_spsr_el2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > return true; > } > > +static bool access_id_aa64mmfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *v, > + struct sys_reg_params *p, > + const struct sys_reg_desc *r) > +{ > + u64 val; > + > + if (p->is_write) > + return write_to_read_only(v, p, r); > + > + val = read_id_reg(v, r, false); > + > + if (!nested_virt_in_use(v)) > + goto out; > + > + /* > + * Don't expose granules smaller than the host's granule to the guest. > + * We can theoretically support a guest hypervisor having > + * smaller-than-host granularities but it is not worth it since it > + * makes the implementation complicated and it would waste memory. > + */ > + switch (PAGE_SIZE) { > + case SZ_64K: > + /* 16KB granule not supported */ > + val &= ~(0xf << ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN16_SHIFT); > + val |= (ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN16_NI << ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN16_SHIFT); > + /* fall through */ > + case SZ_16K: > + /* 4KB granule not supported */ > + val &= ~(0xf << ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN4_SHIFT); > + val |= (ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN4_NI << ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN4_SHIFT); > + break; > + case SZ_4K: > + /* All granule sizes are supported */ > + break; > + default: > + unreachable(); > + } > + > + /* Expose only 40 bits physical address range to the guest hypervisor */ > + val &= ~(0xf << ID_AA64MMFR0_PARANGE_SHIFT); > + val |= (0x2 << ID_AA64MMFR0_PARANGE_SHIFT); /* 40 bits */ There are already defines for ID_AA64MMFR0_PARANGE_48 and ID_AA64MMFR0_PARANGE_52 in sysreg.h, perhaps a similar define for ID_AA64MMFR0_PARANGE_40 would be appropriate? > + > +out: > + p->regval = val; > + > + return true; > +} > + > static bool access_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *v, > struct sys_reg_params *p, > const struct sys_reg_desc *r) > @@ -1846,7 +1894,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = { > ID_UNALLOCATED(6,7), > > /* CRm=7 */ > - ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1), > + ID_SANITISED_FN(ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1, access_id_aa64mmfr0_el1), > ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1), > ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1), > ID_UNALLOCATED(7,3), _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel