From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78058FA3728 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47D5B218DE for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="g84H8PxC"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="i1w1YZlG" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 47D5B218DE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=7PM98tV9zXMSM1koGzHwLQj62aDfz3GbN3H+Jsv+qZE=; b=g84H8PxCOFjob1 E6tjdXJoS4N/dbcGZWcOCHjg4ui+fEu+XbgCJq35O5gQJzF1fddfleMK/81kyqp67v3IWFdcyEljj 0ZpQP171WhvK0SqgOxlTTmOus2lLyM4+FsrZx/S+WKBfLGs57CKbbwEUECTTB3L2UwlrAC3mgcltS rxTplf/QMiFr1u/lukb4lC6CN/6WcdTgWcqD0ErdSpu/6geAdFl4xQyAovPvK1nwzPYAEj/KNyMp9 Lk+MM5KXCdJjDiLWUudenzIa4C3k8fxP2gQHSpHHNZDcjU2qsvP+thfAG8FqikkmesKvsHeNVxp+Z oQhT1EMJY4+rfUY7hdvQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iKhht-0003wF-Mf; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:43:09 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iKhhp-0003vq-PH for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:43:07 +0000 Received: from pobox.suse.cz (prg-ext-pat.suse.com [213.151.95.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14CC221848; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:43:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1571226185; bh=PmYKqxbOOvz8BV7rulnSKvx5ub0QO0AeeOamne1eykg=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=i1w1YZlGDYWLysQYdPGSEO8ia3QEop5kFW1QZeyZiycshs41S1t8NKKBqUzCxCeUh RFXrccRyr7r/WmYMKN7k2gMXNJyd2Jn6n4Z6b8zYbd3lnr/IqfAuSP7p0H7Lt4DIds lul6X0aPFKBqKJXEydY3BFN5TalV6VZM4AltHPTU= Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 13:42:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina To: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] arm64: ftrace with regs In-Reply-To: <20190724161500.GG2624@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: References: <20190208150826.44EBC68DD2@newverein.lst.de> <0f8d2e77-7e51-fba8-b179-102318d9ff84@arm.com> <20190311114945.GA5625@lst.de> <20190408153628.GL6139@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> <20190409175238.GE9255@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> <20190724161500.GG2624@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191016_044305_840146_ACBBD2F9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.95 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Julien Thierry , Catalin Marinas , Ard Biesheuvel , Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt , AKASHI Takahiro , Ingo Molnar , Torsten Duwe , Ruslan Bilovol , Josh Poimboeuf , Amit Daniel Kachhap , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > > So what's the status now? Besides debatable minor style > > > > > issues there were no more objections to v8. Would this > > > > > go through the ARM repo or via the ftrace repo? > > > > > > > > Sorry agains for the delay on this. I'm now back in the office and in > > > > front of a computer daily, so I can spend a bit more time on this. > > > > > > > > Regardless of anything else, I think that we should queue the first > > > > three patches now. I've poked the relevant maintainers for their acks so > > > > that those can be taken via the arm64 tree. > > > > > > > > I'm happy to do the trivial cleanups on the last couple of patches (e.g. > > > > s/lr/x30), and I'm actively looking at the API rework I requested. > > > > > > Ok, I've picked up patches 1-3 and I'll wait for you to spin updates to the > > > last two. > > > > Ok, I see that patches 1-3 are picked up and are already present in recent > > kernels. > > > > Is there any progress on remaining two patches? > > I'm afraid that I've been distracted on other fronts, so I haven't made > progress there. > > > Any help required? > > If you'd be happy to look at the cleanup I previously suggested for the > core, that would be great. When I last looked, it was simple to rework > things so that arch code doesn't have to define MCOUNT_ADDR, but I > hadn't figured out exactly how to split the core mcount assumptions from > the important state machine bits. > > I'll take another look and see if I can provide more detail. :) Hi Mark, has any progress been made on any front? Feels like this got stuck a bit. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel