linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bao D. Nguyen" <nguyenb@codeaurora.org>
To: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, asutoshd@codeaurora.org,
	cang@codeaurora.org, Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Murali Palnati <palnatim@codeaurora.org>,
	"Bao D. Nguyen" <nguyenb@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [<PATCH v1> 2/4] mmc: core: Attribute the IO wait time properly in mmc_wait_for_req_done()
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:05:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00979679b191fd9704664d06b0642c9eb3b4b00c.1582839544.git.nguyenb@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1582839544.git.nguyenb@codeaurora.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1582839544.git.nguyenb@codeaurora.org>

From: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>

In mmc_wait_for_req_done() function, change the call wait_for_completion()
to wait_for_compltion_io(). This change makes the kernel account for
wait time as I/O wait and through another configuration, this io wait
is treated as busy which makes the acpu clock to scale up.

Signed-off-by: Murali Palnati <palnatim@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Bao D. Nguyen <nguyenb@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
index 94441a0..97a384a 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ void mmc_wait_for_req_done(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
 	struct mmc_command *cmd;
 
 	while (1) {
-		wait_for_completion(&mrq->completion);
+		wait_for_completion_io(&mrq->completion);
 
 		cmd = mrq->cmd;
 
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-27 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-27 22:05 [<PATCH v1> 0/4] SD card bug fixes Bao D. Nguyen
2020-02-27 22:05 ` [<PATCH v1> 1/4] mmc: core: Add check for NULL pointer access Bao D. Nguyen
2020-02-28  6:46   ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-06  3:38     ` nguyenb
2020-03-06 10:29       ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-27 22:05 ` Bao D. Nguyen [this message]
2020-02-27 22:05 ` [<PATCH v1> 3/4] mmc: core: Make host->card as NULL when card is removed Bao D. Nguyen
2020-02-27 22:05 ` [<PATCH v1> 4/4] mmc: core: update host->card after getting RCA for SD card Bao D. Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=00979679b191fd9704664d06b0642c9eb3b4b00c.1582839544.git.nguyenb@codeaurora.org \
    --to=nguyenb@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=palnatim@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).