Linux-ARM-MSM Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: kholk11@gmail.com, will@kernel.org
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	marijns95@gmail.com, konradybcio@gmail.com,
	martin.botka1@gmail.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] iommu/arm-smmu: Support test_smr_masks implementation detail deviation
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 16:52:56 +0100
Message-ID: <00afa417-d897-22ee-25a5-cba1bf96c669@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200926130004.13528-5-kholk11@gmail.com>

On 2020-09-26 14:00, kholk11@gmail.com wrote:
> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@gmail.com>
> 
> At least some Qualcomm SoCs do need to override the function
> arm_smmu_test_smr_masks entirely: add a test_smr_masks function
> to the implementation details structure and call it properly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 6 ++++++
>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h | 1 +
>   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> index 09c42af9f31e..446a78dde9cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -977,6 +977,12 @@ static void arm_smmu_test_smr_masks(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>   
>   	if (!smmu->smrs)
>   		return;
> +
> +	if (smmu->impl && smmu->impl->test_smr_masks) {
> +		smmu->impl->test_smr_masks(smmu);

Meh, this doesn't need a special hook - just have ->cfg_probe() 
initialise your masks early and bail out here if smr_mask_mask is 
already set. You could actually bypass this test as-is by marking all 
your SMR entries as valid, but that's likely to cause far more problems 
elsewhere than it solves here ;)

Robin.

> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * If we've had to accommodate firmware memory regions, we may
>   	 * have live SMRs by now; tread carefully...
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> index d890a4a968e8..2cd3d126f675 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> @@ -387,6 +387,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_impl {
>   	int (*cfg_probe)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
>   	int (*reset)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
>   	int (*init_context)(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain);
> +	void (*test_smr_masks)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
>   	void (*tlb_sync)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page, int sync,
>   			 int status);
>   	int (*def_domain_type)(struct device *dev);
> 

  reply index

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-26 12:59 [PATCH 0/8] Implement firmware quirks for Qualcomm ARM-SMMUv2 kholk11
2020-09-26 12:59 ` [PATCH 1/8] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Rename qcom_smmu_impl to qcom_smmu500_impl kholk11
2020-09-26 12:59 ` [PATCH 2/8] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add QC SMMUv2 VA Size quirk for SDM660 kholk11
2020-10-14 15:43   ` Robin Murphy
2020-09-26 12:59 ` [PATCH 3/8] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: add binding for SMMUv2 on Qualcomm SDM660 kholk11
2020-09-29 19:10   ` Rob Herring
2020-09-26 13:00 ` [PATCH 4/8] iommu/arm-smmu: Support test_smr_masks implementation detail deviation kholk11
2020-10-14 15:52   ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2020-09-26 13:00 ` [PATCH 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add test_smr_masks detail to QCOM SMMUv2 kholk11
2020-09-26 13:00 ` [PATCH 6/8] iommu/arm-smmu: Move stream mapping reset to separate function kholk11
2020-10-14 15:56   ` Robin Murphy
2020-09-26 13:00 ` [PATCH 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu: Support stream_mapping_reset implementation detail kholk11
2020-09-26 13:00 ` [PATCH 8/8] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add stream_mapping_reset detail to QCOM SMMUv2 kholk11
2020-10-14 22:14   ` Bjorn Andersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=00afa417-d897-22ee-25a5-cba1bf96c669@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kholk11@gmail.com \
    --cc=konradybcio@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marijns95@gmail.com \
    --cc=martin.botka1@gmail.com \
    --cc=phone-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-ARM-MSM Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/0 linux-arm-msm/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-arm-msm linux-arm-msm/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm \
		linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-arm-msm

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git