From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCCC8C38142 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234193AbjA0QGT (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 11:06:19 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33776 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234159AbjA0QGM (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 11:06:12 -0500 Received: from mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.180.131]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 794237B404; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:05:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0279869.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30RFejPX000765; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:05:35 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : to : cc : references : from : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=qcppdkim1; bh=XgxrgOahCuczz4eXTfNPoySwX33EBdYqksVo82Sl3ss=; b=aGbM0hwgJP2aWBESov7DvWQwFiw+2BVYXH8z9Z4tm30SJLrp0Wgf1o3RErkjnelJpB32 qO+8jndvC5F/uh4+Vg36HjEIDw7ltHKNBCDbino9ZqBRuzYyCZxVj/XiDw2itppOgrmt 2T2/2z/G/DaGtwv3mznaYBVzwdSfzDFNYtfsw4ftVIGC5Xg1F2PJLdgJrEV83AzWexEW Qjw4SjiF+1RLSGcsvJqWRoZqeQUcnKGR1EsMmI/KeA+K2QIZzncRKsNRGUZafeodnKdh u3bjzYFonUEBgMPjYw73PHQyuy+gCnFaobt+VPFxCXNUqdWr+nyV1PfBx9m1YQBJEWS8 cA== Received: from nalasppmta05.qualcomm.com (Global_NAT1.qualcomm.com [129.46.96.20]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ncavc0ph3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:05:35 +0000 Received: from nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com [10.47.209.196]) by NALASPPMTA05.qualcomm.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTPS id 30RG5YCH028188 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:05:34 GMT Received: from [10.50.41.100] (10.80.80.8) by nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.36; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:05:29 -0800 Message-ID: <11a5fa34-c438-a567-6364-4bf1d0d369e3@quicinc.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 21:35:26 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] regulator: qcom_smd: Add PMIC compatible for IPQ9574 Content-Language: en-US To: Rob Herring CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20230113150310.29709-1-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com> <20230113150310.29709-5-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com> <20230117183835.GA3427325-robh@kernel.org> From: Devi Priya In-Reply-To: <20230117183835.GA3427325-robh@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8] X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.141.250) To nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) X-QCInternal: smtphost X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-GUID: OpJib9HjT0AC3SHlMMCU7Pkd9gLAiJS4 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: OpJib9HjT0AC3SHlMMCU7Pkd9gLAiJS4 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.930,Hydra:6.0.562,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2023-01-27_09,2023-01-27_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2301270148 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 1/18/2023 12:08 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 08:33:08PM +0530, devi priya wrote: >> Add mp5496 PMIC compatible string for IPQ9574 SoC >> >> Co-developed-by: Praveenkumar I >> Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I >> Signed-off-by: devi priya >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,smd-rpm-regulator.yaml | 3 ++- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,smd-rpm-regulator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,smd-rpm-regulator.yaml >> index 8c45f53212b1..7907d9385583 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,smd-rpm-regulator.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,smd-rpm-regulator.yaml >> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ description: >> Each sub-node is identified using the node's name, with valid values listed >> for each of the pmics below. >> >> - For mp5496, s2 >> + For mp5496, s1, s2 >> >> For pm2250, s1, s2, s3, s4, l1, l2, l3, l4, l5, l6, l7, l8, l9, l10, l11, >> l12, l13, l14, l15, l16, l17, l18, l19, l20, l21, l22 >> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ properties: >> compatible: >> enum: >> - qcom,rpm-mp5496-regulators >> + - qcom,rpm-ipq9574-mp5496-regulators > > Is this a different part than just mp5496? Or used in a different, > incompatible way? IPQ6018 and IPQ9574 platforms use the same PMIC MP5496 but they have a different power layout.So, we plan to update the compatible: qcom,rpm-mp5496-regulators to qcom,rpm-ipq6018-mp5496-regulators(target-specific) in the next patchset as the regulators serve different purposes > >> - qcom,rpm-pm2250-regulators >> - qcom,rpm-pm6125-regulators >> - qcom,rpm-pm660-regulators >> -- >> 2.17.1 >> Best Regards, Devi Priya