linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
To: swboyd@chromium.org, mka@chromium.org, evgreen@chromium.org,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	agross@kernel.org, dianders@chromium.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org,
	ilina@codeaurora.org, lsrao@codeaurora.org,
	Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v12 3/4] soc: qcom: rpmh: Invoke rpmh_flush() for dirty caches
Date: Thu,  5 Mar 2020 22:37:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1583428023-19559-4-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1583428023-19559-1-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org>

Add changes to invoke rpmh flush() from within cache_lock when the data
in cache is dirty.

This is done only if OSI is not supported in PSCI. If OSI is supported
rpmh_flush can get invoked when the last cpu going to power collapse
deepest low power mode.

Also remove "depends on COMPILE_TEST" for Kconfig option QCOM_RPMH so the
driver is only compiled for arm64 which supports psci_has_osi_support()
API.

Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Srinivas Rao L <lsrao@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig |  2 +-
 drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c  | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
index d0a73e7..2e581bc 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ config QCOM_RMTFS_MEM
 
 config QCOM_RPMH
 	bool "Qualcomm RPM-Hardened (RPMH) Communication"
-	depends on ARCH_QCOM && ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
+	depends on ARCH_QCOM && ARM64
 	help
 	  Support for communication with the hardened-RPM blocks in
 	  Qualcomm Technologies Inc (QTI) SoCs. RPMH communication uses an
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
index 03630ae..1951f6a 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/psci.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
@@ -113,13 +114,14 @@ static struct cache_req *__find_req(struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr, u32 addr)
 	return req;
 }
 
-static struct cache_req *cache_rpm_request(struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr,
+static int cache_rpm_request(struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr,
 					   enum rpmh_state state,
 					   struct tcs_cmd *cmd)
 {
 	struct cache_req *req;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	u32 old_sleep_val, old_wake_val;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctrlr->cache_lock, flags);
 	req = __find_req(ctrlr, cmd->addr);
@@ -155,10 +157,13 @@ static struct cache_req *cache_rpm_request(struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr,
 			req->sleep_val != UINT_MAX &&
 			req->wake_val != UINT_MAX;
 
+	if (ctrlr->dirty && !psci_has_osi_support())
+		ret = rpmh_flush(ctrlr);
+
 unlock:
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctrlr->cache_lock, flags);
 
-	return req;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -176,17 +181,16 @@ static int __rpmh_write(const struct device *dev, enum rpmh_state state,
 			struct rpmh_request *rpm_msg)
 {
 	struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr = get_rpmh_ctrlr(dev);
-	int ret = -EINVAL;
-	struct cache_req *req;
+	int ret;
 	int i;
 
 	rpm_msg->msg.state = state;
 
 	/* Cache the request in our store and link the payload */
 	for (i = 0; i < rpm_msg->msg.num_cmds; i++) {
-		req = cache_rpm_request(ctrlr, state, &rpm_msg->msg.cmds[i]);
-		if (IS_ERR(req))
-			return PTR_ERR(req);
+		ret = cache_rpm_request(ctrlr, state, &rpm_msg->msg.cmds[i]);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 	}
 
 	rpm_msg->msg.state = state;
@@ -283,26 +287,32 @@ int rpmh_write(const struct device *dev, enum rpmh_state state,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmh_write);
 
-static void cache_batch(struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr, struct batch_cache_req *req)
+static int cache_batch(struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr, struct batch_cache_req *req)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctrlr->cache_lock, flags);
+
 	list_add_tail(&req->list, &ctrlr->batch_cache);
 	ctrlr->dirty = true;
+
+	if (!psci_has_osi_support())
+		ret = rpmh_flush(ctrlr);
+
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctrlr->cache_lock, flags);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int flush_batch(struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr)
 {
 	struct batch_cache_req *req;
 	const struct rpmh_request *rpm_msg;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret = 0;
 	int i;
 
 	/* Send Sleep/Wake requests to the controller, expect no response */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctrlr->cache_lock, flags);
 	list_for_each_entry(req, &ctrlr->batch_cache, list) {
 		for (i = 0; i < req->count; i++) {
 			rpm_msg = req->rpm_msgs + i;
@@ -312,7 +322,6 @@ static int flush_batch(struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr)
 				break;
 		}
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctrlr->cache_lock, flags);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -384,10 +393,8 @@ int rpmh_write_batch(const struct device *dev, enum rpmh_state state,
 		cmd += n[i];
 	}
 
-	if (state != RPMH_ACTIVE_ONLY_STATE) {
-		cache_batch(ctrlr, req);
-		return 0;
-	}
+	if (state != RPMH_ACTIVE_ONLY_STATE)
+		return cache_batch(ctrlr, req);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
 		struct completion *compl = &compls[i];
@@ -450,12 +457,10 @@ static int send_single(struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr, enum rpmh_state state,
  *
  * @ctrlr: controller making request to flush cached data
  *
- * Return: -EBUSY if the controller is busy, probably waiting on a response
- * to a RPMH request sent earlier.
+ * Return: 0 on success, error number otherwise.
  *
- * This function is always called from the sleep code from the last CPU
- * that is powering down the entire system. Since no other RPMH API would be
- * executing at this time, it is safe to run lockless.
+ * This function can either be called from sleep code on the last CPU
+ * (thus no spinlock needed) or with the ctrlr->cache_lock already held.
  */
 int rpmh_flush(struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr)
 {
@@ -472,10 +477,6 @@ int rpmh_flush(struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	/*
-	 * Nobody else should be calling this function other than system PM,
-	 * hence we can run without locks.
-	 */
 	list_for_each_entry(p, &ctrlr->cache, list) {
 		if (!is_req_valid(p)) {
 			pr_debug("%s: skipping RPMH req: a:%#x s:%#x w:%#x",
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-05 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-05 17:06 [PATCH v12 0/4] Invoke rpmh_flush for non OSI targets Maulik Shah
2020-03-05 17:07 ` [PATCH v12 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add cpuidle low power states Maulik Shah
2020-03-05 17:07 ` [PATCH v12 2/4] soc: qcom: rpmh: Update dirty flag only when data changes Maulik Shah
2020-03-05 17:07 ` Maulik Shah [this message]
2020-03-05 17:07 ` [PATCH v12 4/4] soc: qcom: rpmh: Invalidate SLEEP and WAKE TCSes before flushing new data Maulik Shah
2020-03-05 22:20   ` Doug Anderson
2020-03-09  8:28     ` Maulik Shah
2020-03-05 17:50 ` [PATCH v12 0/4] Invoke rpmh_flush for non OSI targets Stephen Boyd
2020-03-09  8:29   ` Maulik Shah
2020-03-05 22:22 ` Doug Anderson
2020-03-09  8:27   ` Maulik Shah

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1583428023-19559-4-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org \
    --to=mkshah@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
    --cc=ilina@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lsrao@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).