From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Mike Tipton <mdtipton@codeaurora.org>, tdas@codeaurora.org
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, mturquette@baylibre.com,
agross@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Tipton <mdtipton@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: clk-rpmh: Wait for completion when enabling clocks
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 14:10:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <158378825407.66766.14135857856613969751@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200215021232.1149-1-mdtipton@codeaurora.org>
Quoting Mike Tipton (2020-02-14 18:12:32)
> The current implementation always uses rpmh_write_async, which doesn't
> wait for completion. That's fine for disable requests since there's no
> immediate need for the clocks and they can be disabled in the
> background. However, for enable requests we need to ensure the clocks
> are actually enabled before returning to the client. Otherwise, clients
> can end up accessing their HW before the necessary clocks are enabled,
> which can lead to bus errors.
>
> Use the synchronous version of this API (rpmh_write) for enable requests
> in the active set to ensure completion.
>
> Completion isn't required for sleep/wake sets, since they don't take
> effect until after we enter sleep. All rpmh requests are automatically
> flushed prior to entering sleep.
>
> Fixes: 9c7e47025a6b ("clk: qcom: clk-rpmh: Add QCOM RPMh clock driver")
> Signed-off-by: Mike Tipton <mdtipton@codeaurora.org>
> ---
Applied to clk-next but I squashed in some changes to make it easier for
me to read.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-09 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-15 2:12 [PATCH] clk: qcom: clk-rpmh: Wait for completion when enabling clocks Mike Tipton
2020-02-15 7:32 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-09 21:10 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2020-08-12 13:52 ` Doug Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=158378825407.66766.14135857856613969751@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdtipton@codeaurora.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=tdas@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).