From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
mturquette@baylibre.com, robh+dt@kernel.org
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add SDX55 GCC clock bindings
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:14:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <160627045053.2717324.16519747693186632490@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201119072714.14460-2-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2020-11-18 23:27:11)
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdx55.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdx55.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9d8981817ae3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdx55.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
[...]
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: qcom,gcc-sdx55
> +
> + clocks:
> + items:
[...]
> + - description: PLL test clock source
> +
> + clock-names:
> + items:
[...]
> + - const: core_bi_pll_test_se
Is it optional? As far as I know this clk has never been implemented
because it's a hardware validation thing and not used otherwise.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-25 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-19 7:27 [PATCH v3 0/4] Add GCC and RPMh clock support for SDX55 Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-11-19 7:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add SDX55 GCC clock bindings Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-11-25 2:14 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2020-11-25 3:49 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-11-27 20:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-11-19 7:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] clk: qcom: Add SDX55 GCC support Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-11-19 7:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Introduce RPMHCC bindings for SDX55 Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-11-19 7:27 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] clk: qcom: Add support for SDX55 RPMh clocks Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=160627045053.2717324.16519747693186632490@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).