linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v5 0/4] Add SPMI support for Mediatek MT6873/8192 SoC IC
@ 2020-12-23  2:44 Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  2020-12-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: spmi: modify the constraint 'maxItems' to 'minItems' Hsin-Hsiung Wang
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Hsin-Hsiung Wang @ 2020-12-23  2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring, Matthias Brugger, Geert Uytterhoeven,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Ulf Hansson, Mark Brown
  Cc: Hsin-Hsiung Wang, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, linux-kernel, srv_heupstream,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

This series adds support for new SoC MT6873/8192 to the spmi driver.
This series is based on Weiyi's patches[1].

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/1608642587-15634-7-git-send-email-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com/

changes since v4:
- modify the constraint 'maxItems: 1' to 'minItems: 0'.
- fix the error of the binding document.
- refine the mtk spmi driver for the bettery quality.
- add spmi node into MT8192 dtsi.

Hsin-Hsiung Wang (4):
  dt-bindings: spmi: modify the constraint 'maxItems' to 'minItems'
  dt-bindings: spmi: document binding for the Mediatek SPMI controller
  spmi: mediatek: Add support for MT6873/8192
  arm64: dts: mt8192: add spmi node

 .../bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml      |  74 +++
 .../devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml        |   2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi      |  15 +
 drivers/spmi/Kconfig                          |   9 +
 drivers/spmi/Makefile                         |   1 +
 drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c                  | 504 ++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 604 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml
 create mode 100644 drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c

-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: spmi: modify the constraint 'maxItems' to 'minItems'
  2020-12-23  2:44 [PATCH v5 0/4] Add SPMI support for Mediatek MT6873/8192 SoC IC Hsin-Hsiung Wang
@ 2020-12-23  2:44 ` Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  2020-12-23 17:47   ` Rob Herring
  2020-12-31 15:39   ` Rob Herring
  2020-12-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: spmi: document binding for the Mediatek SPMI controller Hsin-Hsiung Wang
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Hsin-Hsiung Wang @ 2020-12-23  2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring, Matthias Brugger, Geert Uytterhoeven,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Ulf Hansson, Mark Brown
  Cc: Hsin-Hsiung Wang, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, linux-kernel, srv_heupstream,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

The constraint of 'maxItem: 1' might be larger than 1, so we modify it
to 'minItem: 0'.

Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml
index 173940930719..f1a26391ffde 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ properties:
     pattern: "^spmi@.*"
 
   reg:
-    maxItems: 1
+    minItems: 0
 
   "#address-cells":
     const: 2
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: spmi: document binding for the Mediatek SPMI controller
  2020-12-23  2:44 [PATCH v5 0/4] Add SPMI support for Mediatek MT6873/8192 SoC IC Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  2020-12-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: spmi: modify the constraint 'maxItems' to 'minItems' Hsin-Hsiung Wang
@ 2020-12-23  2:44 ` Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  2020-12-23 17:47   ` Rob Herring
  2020-12-31 15:41   ` Rob Herring
  2020-12-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] spmi: mediatek: Add support for MT6873/8192 Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  2020-12-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] arm64: dts: mt8192: add spmi node Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  3 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Hsin-Hsiung Wang @ 2020-12-23  2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring, Matthias Brugger, Geert Uytterhoeven,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Ulf Hansson, Mark Brown
  Cc: Hsin-Hsiung Wang, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, linux-kernel, srv_heupstream,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

This adds documentation for the SPMI controller found on Mediatek SoCs.

Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
---
 .../bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml      | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a43b0302d503
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Mediatek SPMI Controller Device Tree Bindings
+
+maintainers:
+  - Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
+
+description: |+
+  On MediaTek SoCs the PMIC is connected via SPMI and the controller allows
+  for multiple SoCs to control a single SPMI master.
+
+allOf:
+  - $ref: "spmi.yaml"
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: mediatek,mt6873-spmi
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 2
+
+  reg-names:
+    items:
+      - const: pmif
+      - const: spmimst
+
+  clocks:
+    minItems: 3
+    maxItems: 3
+
+  clock-names:
+    items:
+      - const: pmif_sys_ck
+      - const: pmif_tmr_ck
+      - const: spmimst_clk_mux
+
+  assigned-clocks:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  assigned-clock-parents:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - reg-names
+  - clocks
+  - clock-names
+
+unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/clock/mt8192-clk.h>
+
+    spmi: spmi@10027000 {
+        compatible = "mediatek,mt6873-spmi";
+        reg = <0 0x10027000 0 0x000e00>,
+              <0 0x10029000 0 0x000100>;
+        reg-names = "pmif", "spmimst";
+        clocks = <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_PMIC_AP>,
+                 <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_PMIC_TMR>,
+                 <&topckgen CLK_TOP_SPMI_MST_SEL>;
+        clock-names = "pmif_sys_ck",
+                      "pmif_tmr_ck",
+                      "spmimst_clk_mux";
+        assigned-clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_PWRAP_ULPOSC_SEL>;
+        assigned-clock-parents = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_OSC_D10>;
+    };
+...
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 3/4] spmi: mediatek: Add support for MT6873/8192
  2020-12-23  2:44 [PATCH v5 0/4] Add SPMI support for Mediatek MT6873/8192 SoC IC Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  2020-12-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: spmi: modify the constraint 'maxItems' to 'minItems' Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  2020-12-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: spmi: document binding for the Mediatek SPMI controller Hsin-Hsiung Wang
@ 2020-12-23  2:44 ` Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  2021-01-05  7:40   ` Nicolas Boichat
  2020-12-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] arm64: dts: mt8192: add spmi node Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Hsin-Hsiung Wang @ 2020-12-23  2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring, Matthias Brugger, Geert Uytterhoeven,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Ulf Hansson, Mark Brown
  Cc: Hsin-Hsiung Wang, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, linux-kernel, srv_heupstream,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

Add spmi support for MT6873/8192.

Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/spmi/Kconfig         |   9 +
 drivers/spmi/Makefile        |   1 +
 drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 504 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 514 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c

diff --git a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
index a53bad541f1a..418848840999 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
@@ -25,4 +25,13 @@ config SPMI_MSM_PMIC_ARB
 	  This is required for communicating with Qualcomm PMICs and
 	  other devices that have the SPMI interface.
 
+config SPMI_MTK_PMIF
+	tristate "Mediatek SPMI Controller (PMIC Arbiter)"
+	help
+	  If you say yes to this option, support will be included for the
+	  built-in SPMI PMIC Arbiter interface on Mediatek family
+	  processors.
+
+	  This is required for communicating with Mediatek PMICs and
+	  other devices that have the SPMI interface.
 endif
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/Makefile b/drivers/spmi/Makefile
index 55a94cadeffe..91f303b96925 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/spmi/Makefile
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
 obj-$(CONFIG_SPMI)	+= spmi.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_SPMI_MSM_PMIC_ARB)	+= spmi-pmic-arb.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SPMI_MTK_PMIF)	+= spmi-mtk-pmif.o
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..711d3973800b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
@@ -0,0 +1,504 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+//
+// Copyright (c) 2020 MediaTek Inc.
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/spmi.h>
+
+#define SWINF_IDLE	0x00
+#define SWINF_WFVLDCLR	0x06
+
+#define GET_SWINF(x)	(((x) >> 1) & 0x7)
+
+#define PMIF_CMD_REG_0		0
+#define PMIF_CMD_REG		1
+#define PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG	2
+#define PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG	3
+
+#define PMIF_DELAY_US   10
+#define PMIF_TIMEOUT    (10 * 1000)
+
+#define PMIF_CHAN_OFFSET 0x5
+
+#define SPMI_OP_ST_BUSY 1
+
+struct ch_reg {
+	u32 ch_sta;
+	u32 wdata;
+	u32 rdata;
+	u32 ch_send;
+	u32 ch_rdy;
+};
+
+struct pmif {
+	void __iomem	*base;
+	const u32	*regs;
+	void __iomem	*spmimst_base;
+	const u32	*spmimst_regs;
+	u32		soc_chan;
+	int		grpid;
+	raw_spinlock_t	lock;
+	struct clk	*pmif_sys_ck;
+	struct clk	*pmif_tmr_ck;
+	struct clk	*spmimst_clk_mux;
+	struct ch_reg	chan;
+};
+
+enum pmif_regs {
+	PMIF_INIT_DONE,
+	PMIF_INF_EN,
+	PMIF_ARB_EN,
+	PMIF_CMDISSUE_EN,
+	PMIF_TIMER_CTRL,
+	PMIF_SPI_MODE_CTRL,
+	PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_0,
+	PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_0,
+	PMIF_IRQ_CLR_0,
+	PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_1,
+	PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_1,
+	PMIF_IRQ_CLR_1,
+	PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_2,
+	PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_2,
+	PMIF_IRQ_CLR_2,
+	PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_3,
+	PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_3,
+	PMIF_IRQ_CLR_3,
+	PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_4,
+	PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_4,
+	PMIF_IRQ_CLR_4,
+	PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_0,
+	PMIF_WDT_FLAG_0,
+	PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_1,
+	PMIF_WDT_FLAG_1,
+	PMIF_SWINF_0_STA,
+	PMIF_SWINF_0_WDATA_31_0,
+	PMIF_SWINF_0_RDATA_31_0,
+	PMIF_SWINF_0_ACC,
+	PMIF_SWINF_0_VLD_CLR,
+	PMIF_SWINF_1_STA,
+	PMIF_SWINF_1_WDATA_31_0,
+	PMIF_SWINF_1_RDATA_31_0,
+	PMIF_SWINF_1_ACC,
+	PMIF_SWINF_1_VLD_CLR,
+	PMIF_SWINF_2_STA,
+	PMIF_SWINF_2_WDATA_31_0,
+	PMIF_SWINF_2_RDATA_31_0,
+	PMIF_SWINF_2_ACC,
+	PMIF_SWINF_2_VLD_CLR,
+	PMIF_SWINF_3_STA,
+	PMIF_SWINF_3_WDATA_31_0,
+	PMIF_SWINF_3_RDATA_31_0,
+	PMIF_SWINF_3_ACC,
+	PMIF_SWINF_3_VLD_CLR,
+};
+
+static const u32 mt6873_regs[] = {
+	[PMIF_INIT_DONE] =	0x0000,
+	[PMIF_INF_EN] =		0x0024,
+	[PMIF_ARB_EN] =		0x0150,
+	[PMIF_CMDISSUE_EN] =	0x03B4,
+	[PMIF_TIMER_CTRL] =	0x03E0,
+	[PMIF_SPI_MODE_CTRL] =	0x0400,
+	[PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_0] =	0x0418,
+	[PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_0] =	0x0420,
+	[PMIF_IRQ_CLR_0] =	0x0424,
+	[PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_1] =	0x0428,
+	[PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_1] =	0x0430,
+	[PMIF_IRQ_CLR_1] =	0x0434,
+	[PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_2] =	0x0438,
+	[PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_2] =	0x0440,
+	[PMIF_IRQ_CLR_2] =	0x0444,
+	[PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_3] =	0x0448,
+	[PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_3] =	0x0450,
+	[PMIF_IRQ_CLR_3] =	0x0454,
+	[PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_4] =	0x0458,
+	[PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_4] =	0x0460,
+	[PMIF_IRQ_CLR_4] =	0x0464,
+	[PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_0] =	0x046C,
+	[PMIF_WDT_FLAG_0] =	0x0470,
+	[PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_1] =	0x0474,
+	[PMIF_WDT_FLAG_1] =	0x0478,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_0_ACC] =	0x0C00,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_0_WDATA_31_0] =	0x0C04,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_0_RDATA_31_0] =	0x0C14,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_0_VLD_CLR] =	0x0C24,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_0_STA] =	0x0C28,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_1_ACC] =	0x0C40,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_1_WDATA_31_0] =	0x0C44,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_1_RDATA_31_0] =	0x0C54,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_1_VLD_CLR] =	0x0C64,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_1_STA] =	0x0C68,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_2_ACC] =	0x0C80,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_2_WDATA_31_0] =	0x0C84,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_2_RDATA_31_0] =	0x0C94,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_2_VLD_CLR] =	0x0CA4,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_2_STA] =	0x0CA8,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_3_ACC] =	0x0CC0,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_3_WDATA_31_0] =	0x0CC4,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_3_RDATA_31_0] =	0x0CD4,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_3_VLD_CLR] =	0x0CE4,
+	[PMIF_SWINF_3_STA] =	0x0CE8,
+};
+
+enum spmi_regs {
+	SPMI_OP_ST_CTRL,
+	SPMI_GRP_ID_EN,
+	SPMI_OP_ST_STA,
+	SPMI_MST_SAMPL,
+	SPMI_MST_REQ_EN,
+	SPMI_REC_CTRL,
+	SPMI_REC0,
+	SPMI_REC1,
+	SPMI_REC2,
+	SPMI_REC3,
+	SPMI_REC4,
+	SPMI_MST_DBG,
+};
+
+static const u32 mt6873_spmi_regs[] = {
+	[SPMI_OP_ST_CTRL] =	0x0000,
+	[SPMI_GRP_ID_EN] =	0x0004,
+	[SPMI_OP_ST_STA] =	0x0008,
+	[SPMI_MST_SAMPL] =	0x000c,
+	[SPMI_MST_REQ_EN] =	0x0010,
+	[SPMI_REC_CTRL] =	0x0040,
+	[SPMI_REC0] =		0x0044,
+	[SPMI_REC1] =		0x0048,
+	[SPMI_REC2] =		0x004c,
+	[SPMI_REC3] =		0x0050,
+	[SPMI_REC4] =		0x0054,
+	[SPMI_MST_DBG] =	0x00fc,
+};
+
+static u32 pmif_readl(struct pmif *arb, enum pmif_regs reg)
+{
+	return readl(arb->base + arb->regs[reg]);
+}
+
+static void pmif_writel(struct pmif *arb, u32 val, enum pmif_regs reg)
+{
+	writel(val, arb->base + arb->regs[reg]);
+}
+
+static void mtk_spmi_writel(struct pmif *arb, u32 val, enum spmi_regs reg)
+{
+	writel(val, arb->spmimst_base + arb->spmimst_regs[reg]);
+}
+
+static bool pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(struct pmif *arb)
+{
+	u32 reg_rdata;
+
+	reg_rdata = pmif_readl(arb, arb->chan.ch_sta);
+	return GET_SWINF(reg_rdata) == SWINF_WFVLDCLR;
+}
+
+static int pmif_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
+{
+	struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
+	u32 rdata, cmd;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Check the opcode */
+	if (opc == SPMI_CMD_RESET)
+		cmd = 0;
+	else if (opc == SPMI_CMD_SLEEP)
+		cmd = 1;
+	else if (opc == SPMI_CMD_SHUTDOWN)
+		cmd = 2;
+	else if (opc == SPMI_CMD_WAKEUP)
+		cmd = 3;
+	else
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mtk_spmi_writel(arb, (cmd << 0x4) | sid, SPMI_OP_ST_CTRL);
+	ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->spmimst_base + arb->spmimst_regs[SPMI_OP_ST_STA],
+					rdata, (rdata & SPMI_OP_ST_BUSY) == SPMI_OP_ST_BUSY,
+					PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "timeout, err = %d\n", ret);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int pmif_spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
+			      u16 addr, u8 *buf, size_t len)
+{
+	struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
+	struct ch_reg *inf_reg;
+	int ret;
+	u32 data, cmd, bc = len - 1;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	/* Check for argument validation. */
+	if (sid & ~(0xf)) {
+		dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "exceed the max slv id\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (!arb) {
+		dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "Cannot get pmif control to send cmd\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	inf_reg = &arb->chan;
+
+	if (opc >= 0x60 && opc <= 0x7f)
+		opc = PMIF_CMD_REG;
+	else if (opc >= 0x20 && opc <= 0x2f)
+		opc = PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG;
+	else if (opc >= 0x38 && opc <= 0x3f)
+		opc = PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG;
+	else
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&arb->lock, flags);
+
+	/* Wait for Software Interface FSM state to be IDLE. */
+	ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->base + arb->regs[inf_reg->ch_sta],
+					data, GET_SWINF(data) == SWINF_IDLE,
+					PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		/* set channel ready if the data has transferred */
+		if (pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(arb))
+			pmif_writel(arb, 1, inf_reg->ch_rdy);
+		dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "failed to wait for SWINF_IDLE\n");
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	/* Send the command. */
+	cmd = (opc << 30) | (sid << 24) | (bc << 16) | addr;
+	pmif_writel(arb, cmd, inf_reg->ch_send);
+
+	/*
+	 * Wait for Software Interface FSM state to be WFVLDCLR,
+	 * read the data and clear the valid flag.
+	 */
+	ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->base + arb->regs[inf_reg->ch_sta],
+					data, GET_SWINF(data) == SWINF_WFVLDCLR,
+					PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "failed to wait for SWINF_WFVLDCLR\n");
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	data = pmif_readl(arb, inf_reg->rdata);
+	memcpy(buf, &data, (bc & 3) + 1);
+	pmif_writel(arb, 1, inf_reg->ch_rdy);
+
+out:
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&arb->lock, flags);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int pmif_spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
+			       u16 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
+{
+	struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
+	struct ch_reg *inf_reg = NULL;
+	int ret;
+	u32 data, cmd, bc = len - 1;
+	unsigned long flags = 0;
+
+	/* Check for argument validation. */
+	if (sid & ~(0xf)) {
+		dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "exceed the max slv id\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (!arb) {
+		dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "Cannot get pmif control to send cmd\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	inf_reg = &arb->chan;
+
+	/* Check the opcode */
+	if (opc >= 0x40 && opc <= 0x5F)
+		opc = PMIF_CMD_REG;
+	else if (opc <= 0x0F)
+		opc = PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG;
+	else if (opc >= 0x30 && opc <= 0x37)
+		opc = PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG;
+	else if (opc >= 0x80)
+		opc = PMIF_CMD_REG_0;
+	else
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&arb->lock, flags);
+	/* Wait for Software Interface FSM state to be IDLE. */
+	ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->base + arb->regs[inf_reg->ch_sta],
+					data, GET_SWINF(data) == SWINF_IDLE,
+					PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		/* set channel ready if the data has transferred */
+		if (pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(arb))
+			pmif_writel(arb, 1, inf_reg->ch_rdy);
+		dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "failed to wait for SWINF_IDLE\n");
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	/* Set the write data. */
+	memcpy(&data, buf, (bc & 3) + 1);
+	pmif_writel(arb, data, inf_reg->wdata);
+
+	/* Send the command. */
+	cmd = (opc << 30) | BIT(29) | (sid << 24) | (bc << 16) | addr;
+	pmif_writel(arb, cmd, inf_reg->ch_send);
+out:
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&arb->lock, flags);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct pmif mt6873_pmif_arb[] = {
+	{
+		.regs = mt6873_regs,
+		.spmimst_regs = mt6873_spmi_regs,
+		.soc_chan = 2,
+	},
+};
+
+static int mtk_spmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct pmif *arb;
+	struct spmi_controller *ctrl;
+	int err;
+
+	ctrl = spmi_controller_alloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*arb));
+	if (!ctrl)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	ctrl->cmd = pmif_arb_cmd;
+	ctrl->read_cmd = pmif_spmi_read_cmd;
+	ctrl->write_cmd = pmif_spmi_write_cmd;
+
+	/* re-assign of_id->data */
+	spmi_controller_set_drvdata(ctrl, of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev));
+	arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
+	if (!arb) {
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot get pmif control\n");
+		goto err_put_ctrl;
+	}
+
+	arb->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "pmif");
+	if (IS_ERR(arb->base)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(arb->base);
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pmif failed to get the remappped memory\n");
+		goto err_put_ctrl;
+	}
+
+	arb->spmimst_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "spmimst");
+	if (IS_ERR(arb->spmimst_base)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(arb->spmimst_base);
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "spmimst failed to get the remappped memory\n");
+		goto err_put_ctrl;
+	}
+
+	arb->pmif_sys_ck = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pmif_sys_ck");
+	if (IS_ERR(arb->pmif_sys_ck)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(arb->pmif_sys_ck);
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get ap clock: %d\n", err);
+		goto err_put_ctrl;
+	}
+
+	arb->pmif_tmr_ck = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pmif_tmr_ck");
+	if (IS_ERR(arb->pmif_tmr_ck)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(arb->pmif_tmr_ck);
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get tmr clock: %d\n", err);
+		goto err_put_ctrl;
+	}
+
+	arb->spmimst_clk_mux = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "spmimst_clk_mux");
+	if (IS_ERR(arb->spmimst_clk_mux)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(arb->spmimst_clk_mux);
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get mux: %d\n", err);
+		goto err_put_ctrl;
+	}
+
+	err = clk_prepare_enable(arb->pmif_sys_ck);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "fail to enable ap clk\n");
+		goto err_put_ctrl;
+	}
+
+	err = clk_prepare_enable(arb->pmif_tmr_ck);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "fail to enable tmr clk.\n");
+		goto err_clk_1;
+	}
+
+	err = clk_prepare_enable(arb->spmimst_clk_mux);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "fail to enable spmi master clk.\n");
+		goto err_clk_2;
+	}
+
+	arb->chan.ch_sta = PMIF_SWINF_0_STA + (PMIF_CHAN_OFFSET * arb->soc_chan);
+	arb->chan.wdata = PMIF_SWINF_0_WDATA_31_0 + (PMIF_CHAN_OFFSET * arb->soc_chan);
+	arb->chan.rdata = PMIF_SWINF_0_RDATA_31_0 + (PMIF_CHAN_OFFSET * arb->soc_chan);
+	arb->chan.ch_send = PMIF_SWINF_0_ACC + (PMIF_CHAN_OFFSET * arb->soc_chan);
+	arb->chan.ch_rdy = PMIF_SWINF_0_VLD_CLR + (PMIF_CHAN_OFFSET * arb->soc_chan);
+
+	raw_spin_lock_init(&arb->lock);
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ctrl);
+
+	err = spmi_controller_add(ctrl);
+	if (err)
+		goto err_domain_remove;
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_domain_remove:
+	clk_disable_unprepare(arb->spmimst_clk_mux);
+err_clk_2:
+	clk_disable_unprepare(arb->pmif_tmr_ck);
+err_clk_1:
+	clk_disable_unprepare(arb->pmif_sys_ck);
+err_put_ctrl:
+	spmi_controller_put(ctrl);
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int mtk_spmi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct spmi_controller *ctrl = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	spmi_controller_remove(ctrl);
+	spmi_controller_put(ctrl);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id mtk_spmi_match_table[] = {
+	{
+		.compatible = "mediatek,mt6873-spmi",
+		.data = &mt6873_pmif_arb,
+	}, {
+		/* sentinel */
+	},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_spmi_match_table);
+
+static struct platform_driver mtk_spmi_driver = {
+	.driver		= {
+		.name	= "spmi-mtk",
+		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(mtk_spmi_match_table),
+	},
+	.probe		= mtk_spmi_probe,
+	.remove		= mtk_spmi_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(mtk_spmi_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MediaTek SPMI Driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 4/4] arm64: dts: mt8192: add spmi node
  2020-12-23  2:44 [PATCH v5 0/4] Add SPMI support for Mediatek MT6873/8192 SoC IC Hsin-Hsiung Wang
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-12-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] spmi: mediatek: Add support for MT6873/8192 Hsin-Hsiung Wang
@ 2020-12-23  2:44 ` Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Hsin-Hsiung Wang @ 2020-12-23  2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring, Matthias Brugger, Geert Uytterhoeven,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Ulf Hansson, Mark Brown
  Cc: Hsin-Hsiung Wang, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, linux-kernel, srv_heupstream,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

Add spmi node to SOC MT8192.

Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
index 69d45c7b31f1..6dc8aa97acc3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
@@ -272,6 +272,21 @@
 			clock-names = "clk13m";
 		};
 
+		spmi: spmi@10027000 {
+			compatible = "mediatek,mt6873-spmi";
+			reg = <0 0x10027000 0 0x000e00>,
+			      <0 0x10029000 0 0x000100>;
+			reg-names = "pmif", "spmimst";
+			clocks = <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_PMIC_AP>,
+				 <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_PMIC_TMR>,
+				 <&topckgen CLK_TOP_SPMI_MST_SEL>;
+			clock-names = "pmif_sys_ck",
+				      "pmif_tmr_ck",
+				      "spmimst_clk_mux";
+			assigned-clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_PWRAP_ULPOSC_SEL>;
+			assigned-clock-parents = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_OSC_D10>;
+		};
+
 		scp_adsp: syscon@10720000 {
 			compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-scp_adsp", "syscon";
 			reg = <0 0x10720000 0 0x1000>;
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: spmi: document binding for the Mediatek SPMI controller
  2020-12-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: spmi: document binding for the Mediatek SPMI controller Hsin-Hsiung Wang
@ 2020-12-23 17:47   ` Rob Herring
  2020-12-31 15:41   ` Rob Herring
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2020-12-23 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Geert Uytterhoeven, Matthias Brugger,
	Stephen Boyd, linux-kernel, Rob Herring, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Ulf Hansson, Mark Brown, srv_heupstream,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group, linux-arm-msm, devicetree

On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:44:27 +0800, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote:
> This adds documentation for the SPMI controller found on Mediatek SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml      | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml
> 

My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:

yamllint warnings/errors:

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.example.dts:19:18: fatal error: dt-bindings/clock/mt8192-clk.h: No such file or directory
   19 |         #include <dt-bindings/clock/mt8192-clk.h>
      |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:342: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.example.dt.yaml] Error 1
make: *** [Makefile:1370: dt_binding_check] Error 2

See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1419576

This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
series is generally the most recent rc1.

If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:

pip3 install dtschema --upgrade

Please check and re-submit.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: spmi: modify the constraint 'maxItems' to 'minItems'
  2020-12-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: spmi: modify the constraint 'maxItems' to 'minItems' Hsin-Hsiung Wang
@ 2020-12-23 17:47   ` Rob Herring
  2020-12-31 15:39   ` Rob Herring
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2020-12-23 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  Cc: linux-arm-msm, Matthias Brugger, Rob Herring, Geert Uytterhoeven,
	Stephen Boyd, srv_heupstream, linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel,
	devicetree, linux-kernel, Ulf Hansson, Mauro Carvalho Chehab,
	Mark Brown, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:44:26 +0800, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote:
> The constraint of 'maxItem: 1' might be larger than 1, so we modify it
> to 'minItem: 0'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:

yamllint warnings/errors:

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml: properties:reg: 'anyOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
	'maxItems' is a required property
	/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml: properties:reg: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
		'minItems' is not one of ['maxItems']
		'minItems' is not one of ['description', 'deprecated', 'const', 'enum', 'minimum', 'maximum', 'default', '$ref']
	0 is less than the minimum of 1
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml: ignoring, error in schema: properties: reg
warning: no schema found in file: ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml

See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1419575

This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
series is generally the most recent rc1.

If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:

pip3 install dtschema --upgrade

Please check and re-submit.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: spmi: modify the constraint 'maxItems' to 'minItems'
  2020-12-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: spmi: modify the constraint 'maxItems' to 'minItems' Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  2020-12-23 17:47   ` Rob Herring
@ 2020-12-31 15:39   ` Rob Herring
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2020-12-31 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  Cc: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Geert Uytterhoeven,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Ulf Hansson, Mark Brown, linux-arm-msm,
	devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, linux-kernel,
	srv_heupstream, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 10:44:26AM +0800, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote:
> The constraint of 'maxItem: 1' might be larger than 1, so we modify it
> to 'minItem: 0'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml
> index 173940930719..f1a26391ffde 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ properties:
>      pattern: "^spmi@.*"
>  
>    reg:
> -    maxItems: 1
> +    minItems: 0

0 is never right. That's 'reg' not present.

>  
>    "#address-cells":
>      const: 2
> -- 
> 2.18.0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: spmi: document binding for the Mediatek SPMI controller
  2020-12-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: spmi: document binding for the Mediatek SPMI controller Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  2020-12-23 17:47   ` Rob Herring
@ 2020-12-31 15:41   ` Rob Herring
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2020-12-31 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  Cc: linux-kernel, Ulf Hansson, Stephen Boyd, Mark Brown,
	srv_heupstream, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group,
	linux-mediatek, Matthias Brugger, Mauro Carvalho Chehab,
	Geert Uytterhoeven, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	Rob Herring

On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:44:27 +0800, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote:
> This adds documentation for the SPMI controller found on Mediatek SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml      | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml
> 

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] spmi: mediatek: Add support for MT6873/8192
  2020-12-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] spmi: mediatek: Add support for MT6873/8192 Hsin-Hsiung Wang
@ 2021-01-05  7:40   ` Nicolas Boichat
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Boichat @ 2021-01-05  7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  Cc: Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring, Matthias Brugger, Geert Uytterhoeven,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Ulf Hansson, Mark Brown, Devicetree List,
	srv_heupstream, linux-arm-msm, lkml,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group,
	moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, linux-arm Mailing List

On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 10:45 AM Hsin-Hsiung Wang
<hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> Add spmi support for MT6873/8192.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/spmi/Kconfig         |   9 +
>  drivers/spmi/Makefile        |   1 +
>  drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 504 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 514 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
> index a53bad541f1a..418848840999 100644
> --- a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
> @@ -25,4 +25,13 @@ config SPMI_MSM_PMIC_ARB
>           This is required for communicating with Qualcomm PMICs and
>           other devices that have the SPMI interface.
>
> +config SPMI_MTK_PMIF
> +       tristate "Mediatek SPMI Controller (PMIC Arbiter)"
> +       help
> +         If you say yes to this option, support will be included for the
> +         built-in SPMI PMIC Arbiter interface on Mediatek family
> +         processors.
> +
> +         This is required for communicating with Mediatek PMICs and
> +         other devices that have the SPMI interface.
>  endif
> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/Makefile b/drivers/spmi/Makefile
> index 55a94cadeffe..91f303b96925 100644
> --- a/drivers/spmi/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/spmi/Makefile
> @@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SPMI)     += spmi.o
>
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SPMI_MSM_PMIC_ARB)        += spmi-pmic-arb.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SPMI_MTK_PMIF)    += spmi-mtk-pmif.o
> \ No newline at end of file

Newline at end of file please.

> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..711d3973800b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,504 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +//
> +// Copyright (c) 2020 MediaTek Inc.
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/spmi.h>
> +
> +#define SWINF_IDLE     0x00
> +#define SWINF_WFVLDCLR 0x06
> +
> +#define GET_SWINF(x)   (((x) >> 1) & 0x7)
> +
> +#define PMIF_CMD_REG_0         0
> +#define PMIF_CMD_REG           1
> +#define PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG       2
> +#define PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG  3
> +
> +#define PMIF_DELAY_US   10
> +#define PMIF_TIMEOUT    (10 * 1000)

PMIF_TIMEOUT_US

> +
> +#define PMIF_CHAN_OFFSET 0x5
> +
> +#define SPMI_OP_ST_BUSY 1
> +
> +struct ch_reg {
> +       u32 ch_sta;
> +       u32 wdata;
> +       u32 rdata;
> +       u32 ch_send;
> +       u32 ch_rdy;
> +};
> +
> +struct pmif {
> +       void __iomem    *base;
> +       const u32       *regs;
> +       void __iomem    *spmimst_base;
> +       const u32       *spmimst_regs;
> +       u32             soc_chan;
> +       int             grpid;

Drop this, never used.

> +       raw_spinlock_t  lock;
> +       struct clk      *pmif_sys_ck;
> +       struct clk      *pmif_tmr_ck;
> +       struct clk      *spmimst_clk_mux;
> +       struct ch_reg   chan;
> +};
> +
> +enum pmif_regs {
> +       PMIF_INIT_DONE,
> +       PMIF_INF_EN,
> +       PMIF_ARB_EN,
> +       PMIF_CMDISSUE_EN,
> +       PMIF_TIMER_CTRL,
> +       PMIF_SPI_MODE_CTRL,
> +       PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_0,
> +       PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_0,
> +       PMIF_IRQ_CLR_0,
> +       PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_1,
> +       PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_1,
> +       PMIF_IRQ_CLR_1,
> +       PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_2,
> +       PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_2,
> +       PMIF_IRQ_CLR_2,
> +       PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_3,
> +       PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_3,
> +       PMIF_IRQ_CLR_3,
> +       PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_4,
> +       PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_4,
> +       PMIF_IRQ_CLR_4,
> +       PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_0,
> +       PMIF_WDT_FLAG_0,
> +       PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_1,
> +       PMIF_WDT_FLAG_1,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_0_STA,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_0_WDATA_31_0,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_0_RDATA_31_0,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_0_ACC,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_0_VLD_CLR,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_1_STA,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_1_WDATA_31_0,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_1_RDATA_31_0,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_1_ACC,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_1_VLD_CLR,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_2_STA,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_2_WDATA_31_0,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_2_RDATA_31_0,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_2_ACC,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_2_VLD_CLR,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_3_STA,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_3_WDATA_31_0,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_3_RDATA_31_0,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_3_ACC,
> +       PMIF_SWINF_3_VLD_CLR,
> +};
> +
> +static const u32 mt6873_regs[] = {
> +       [PMIF_INIT_DONE] =      0x0000,
> +       [PMIF_INF_EN] =         0x0024,
> +       [PMIF_ARB_EN] =         0x0150,
> +       [PMIF_CMDISSUE_EN] =    0x03B4,
> +       [PMIF_TIMER_CTRL] =     0x03E0,
> +       [PMIF_SPI_MODE_CTRL] =  0x0400,
> +       [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_0] = 0x0418,
> +       [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_0] =     0x0420,
> +       [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_0] =      0x0424,
> +       [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_1] = 0x0428,
> +       [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_1] =     0x0430,
> +       [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_1] =      0x0434,
> +       [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_2] = 0x0438,
> +       [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_2] =     0x0440,
> +       [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_2] =      0x0444,
> +       [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_3] = 0x0448,
> +       [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_3] =     0x0450,
> +       [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_3] =      0x0454,
> +       [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_4] = 0x0458,
> +       [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_4] =     0x0460,
> +       [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_4] =      0x0464,
> +       [PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_0] = 0x046C,
> +       [PMIF_WDT_FLAG_0] =     0x0470,
> +       [PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_1] = 0x0474,
> +       [PMIF_WDT_FLAG_1] =     0x0478,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_0_ACC] =    0x0C00,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_0_WDATA_31_0] =     0x0C04,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_0_RDATA_31_0] =     0x0C14,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_0_VLD_CLR] =        0x0C24,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_0_STA] =    0x0C28,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_1_ACC] =    0x0C40,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_1_WDATA_31_0] =     0x0C44,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_1_RDATA_31_0] =     0x0C54,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_1_VLD_CLR] =        0x0C64,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_1_STA] =    0x0C68,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_2_ACC] =    0x0C80,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_2_WDATA_31_0] =     0x0C84,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_2_RDATA_31_0] =     0x0C94,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_2_VLD_CLR] =        0x0CA4,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_2_STA] =    0x0CA8,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_3_ACC] =    0x0CC0,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_3_WDATA_31_0] =     0x0CC4,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_3_RDATA_31_0] =     0x0CD4,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_3_VLD_CLR] =        0x0CE4,
> +       [PMIF_SWINF_3_STA] =    0x0CE8,
> +};
> +
> +enum spmi_regs {
> +       SPMI_OP_ST_CTRL,
> +       SPMI_GRP_ID_EN,
> +       SPMI_OP_ST_STA,
> +       SPMI_MST_SAMPL,
> +       SPMI_MST_REQ_EN,
> +       SPMI_REC_CTRL,
> +       SPMI_REC0,
> +       SPMI_REC1,
> +       SPMI_REC2,
> +       SPMI_REC3,
> +       SPMI_REC4,
> +       SPMI_MST_DBG,
> +};
> +
> +static const u32 mt6873_spmi_regs[] = {
> +       [SPMI_OP_ST_CTRL] =     0x0000,
> +       [SPMI_GRP_ID_EN] =      0x0004,
> +       [SPMI_OP_ST_STA] =      0x0008,
> +       [SPMI_MST_SAMPL] =      0x000c,
> +       [SPMI_MST_REQ_EN] =     0x0010,
> +       [SPMI_REC_CTRL] =       0x0040,
> +       [SPMI_REC0] =           0x0044,
> +       [SPMI_REC1] =           0x0048,
> +       [SPMI_REC2] =           0x004c,
> +       [SPMI_REC3] =           0x0050,
> +       [SPMI_REC4] =           0x0054,
> +       [SPMI_MST_DBG] =        0x00fc,
> +};
> +
> +static u32 pmif_readl(struct pmif *arb, enum pmif_regs reg)
> +{
> +       return readl(arb->base + arb->regs[reg]);
> +}
> +
> +static void pmif_writel(struct pmif *arb, u32 val, enum pmif_regs reg)
> +{
> +       writel(val, arb->base + arb->regs[reg]);
> +}
> +
> +static void mtk_spmi_writel(struct pmif *arb, u32 val, enum spmi_regs reg)
> +{
> +       writel(val, arb->spmimst_base + arb->spmimst_regs[reg]);
> +}
> +
> +static bool pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(struct pmif *arb)
> +{
> +       u32 reg_rdata;
> +
> +       reg_rdata = pmif_readl(arb, arb->chan.ch_sta);
> +       return GET_SWINF(reg_rdata) == SWINF_WFVLDCLR;
> +}
> +
> +static int pmif_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
> +{
> +       struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
> +       u32 rdata, cmd;
> +       int ret;
> +

As highlighted by Fei, do you want to validate sid here?

> +       /* Check the opcode */
> +       if (opc == SPMI_CMD_RESET)
> +               cmd = 0;
> +       else if (opc == SPMI_CMD_SLEEP)
> +               cmd = 1;
> +       else if (opc == SPMI_CMD_SHUTDOWN)
> +               cmd = 2;
> +       else if (opc == SPMI_CMD_WAKEUP)
> +               cmd = 3;

Since these SPMI_CMD_* values are all between 0x10 and 0x13, maybe
this is simpler?

if (opc < SPMI_CMD_RESET || opc > SPMI_CMD_WAKEUP)
   return -EINVAL;

cmd = opc - SPMI_CMD_RESET;

> +       else
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       mtk_spmi_writel(arb, (cmd << 0x4) | sid, SPMI_OP_ST_CTRL);
> +       ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->spmimst_base + arb->spmimst_regs[SPMI_OP_ST_STA],
> +                                       rdata, (rdata & SPMI_OP_ST_BUSY) == SPMI_OP_ST_BUSY,
> +                                       PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT);
> +       if (ret < 0)
> +               dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "timeout, err = %d\n", ret);
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int pmif_spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
> +                             u16 addr, u8 *buf, size_t len)
> +{
> +       struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
> +       struct ch_reg *inf_reg;
> +       int ret;
> +       u32 data, cmd, bc = len - 1;
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +
> +       /* Check for argument validation. */
> +       if (sid & ~(0xf)) {

nit: No need for parenthesis around 0xf.

> +               dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "exceed the max slv id\n");
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (!arb) {
> +               dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "Cannot get pmif control to send cmd\n");
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }

I actually don't think you need to validate arb, something is very
wrong if spmi_controller_get_drvdata returns NULL.

> +
> +       inf_reg = &arb->chan;
> +
> +       if (opc >= 0x60 && opc <= 0x7f)
> +               opc = PMIF_CMD_REG;
> +       else if (opc >= 0x20 && opc <= 0x2f)
> +               opc = PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG;
> +       else if (opc >= 0x38 && opc <= 0x3f)

Merge these 2 if in one statement?

else if ((opc >= 0x20 && opc <= 0x2f) || (opc >= 0x38 && opc <= 0x3f))

> +               opc = PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG;
> +       else
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&arb->lock, flags);
> +
> +       /* Wait for Software Interface FSM state to be IDLE. */
> +       ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->base + arb->regs[inf_reg->ch_sta],
> +                                       data, GET_SWINF(data) == SWINF_IDLE,
> +                                       PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT);
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               /* set channel ready if the data has transferred */
> +               if (pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(arb))
> +                       pmif_writel(arb, 1, inf_reg->ch_rdy);
> +               dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "failed to wait for SWINF_IDLE\n");
> +               goto out;
> +       }
> +
> +       /* Send the command. */
> +       cmd = (opc << 30) | (sid << 24) | (bc << 16) | addr;
> +       pmif_writel(arb, cmd, inf_reg->ch_send);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Wait for Software Interface FSM state to be WFVLDCLR,
> +        * read the data and clear the valid flag.
> +        */
> +       ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->base + arb->regs[inf_reg->ch_sta],
> +                                       data, GET_SWINF(data) == SWINF_WFVLDCLR,
> +                                       PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT);
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "failed to wait for SWINF_WFVLDCLR\n");
> +               goto out;
> +       }
> +
> +       data = pmif_readl(arb, inf_reg->rdata);
> +       memcpy(buf, &data, (bc & 3) + 1);

What's the "bc & 3" about? Do we also need to validate that len can't be >4?

> +       pmif_writel(arb, 1, inf_reg->ch_rdy);
> +
> +out:
> +       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&arb->lock, flags);
> +       if (ret < 0)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pmif_spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
> +                              u16 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
> +{
> +       struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
> +       struct ch_reg *inf_reg = NULL;

No need to set to NULL.

> +       int ret;
> +       u32 data, cmd, bc = len - 1;
> +       unsigned long flags = 0;

No need to set to 0.

> +
> +       /* Check for argument validation. */
> +       if (sid & ~(0xf)) {
> +               dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "exceed the max slv id\n");
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (!arb) {
> +               dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "Cannot get pmif control to send cmd\n");
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }

ditto: no need to validate arb IMHO.

> +
> +       inf_reg = &arb->chan;
> +
> +       /* Check the opcode */
> +       if (opc >= 0x40 && opc <= 0x5F)
> +               opc = PMIF_CMD_REG;
> +       else if (opc <= 0x0F)
> +               opc = PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG;
> +       else if (opc >= 0x30 && opc <= 0x37)
> +               opc = PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG;

Ditto about merging these 2.

> +       else if (opc >= 0x80)
> +               opc = PMIF_CMD_REG_0;
> +       else
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&arb->lock, flags);
> +       /* Wait for Software Interface FSM state to be IDLE. */
> +       ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->base + arb->regs[inf_reg->ch_sta],
> +                                       data, GET_SWINF(data) == SWINF_IDLE,
> +                                       PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT);
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               /* set channel ready if the data has transferred */
> +               if (pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(arb))
> +                       pmif_writel(arb, 1, inf_reg->ch_rdy);
> +               dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "failed to wait for SWINF_IDLE\n");
> +               goto out;
> +       }
> +
> +       /* Set the write data. */
> +       memcpy(&data, buf, (bc & 3) + 1);
> +       pmif_writel(arb, data, inf_reg->wdata);
> +
> +       /* Send the command. */
> +       cmd = (opc << 30) | BIT(29) | (sid << 24) | (bc << 16) | addr;
> +       pmif_writel(arb, cmd, inf_reg->ch_send);
> +out:
> +       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&arb->lock, flags);
> +       if (ret < 0)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct pmif mt6873_pmif_arb[] = {
> +       {
> +               .regs = mt6873_regs,
> +               .spmimst_regs = mt6873_spmi_regs,
> +               .soc_chan = 2,
> +       },
> +};

Why is this an array with one element?

Also, of compatible matches are _usually_ constant, so I think you
should create a structure (e.g. struct pmif_data) with only the
read-only fields.

> +
> +static int mtk_spmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +       struct pmif *arb;
> +       struct spmi_controller *ctrl;
> +       int err;
> +
> +       ctrl = spmi_controller_alloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*arb));
> +       if (!ctrl)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       ctrl->cmd = pmif_arb_cmd;
> +       ctrl->read_cmd = pmif_spmi_read_cmd;
> +       ctrl->write_cmd = pmif_spmi_write_cmd;
> +
> +       /* re-assign of_id->data */
> +       spmi_controller_set_drvdata(ctrl, of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev));
> +       arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
> +       if (!arb) {

This looks wrong. spmi_controller_alloc is already allocating the
private data for you.

So I think you're going to need to change according to my comment
above, and it should look like this:

arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
arb->data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);

if (!arb->data)

> +               err = -EINVAL;
> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot get pmif control\n");
> +               goto err_put_ctrl;
> +       }
> +
> +       arb->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "pmif");
> +       if (IS_ERR(arb->base)) {
> +               err = PTR_ERR(arb->base);
> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pmif failed to get the remappped memory\n");
> +               goto err_put_ctrl;
> +       }
> +
> +       arb->spmimst_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "spmimst");
> +       if (IS_ERR(arb->spmimst_base)) {
> +               err = PTR_ERR(arb->spmimst_base);
> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "spmimst failed to get the remappped memory\n");
> +               goto err_put_ctrl;
> +       }
> +
> +       arb->pmif_sys_ck = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pmif_sys_ck");
> +       if (IS_ERR(arb->pmif_sys_ck)) {
> +               err = PTR_ERR(arb->pmif_sys_ck);
> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get ap clock: %d\n", err);
> +               goto err_put_ctrl;
> +       }
> +
> +       arb->pmif_tmr_ck = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pmif_tmr_ck");
> +       if (IS_ERR(arb->pmif_tmr_ck)) {
> +               err = PTR_ERR(arb->pmif_tmr_ck);
> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get tmr clock: %d\n", err);
> +               goto err_put_ctrl;
> +       }
> +
> +       arb->spmimst_clk_mux = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "spmimst_clk_mux");
> +       if (IS_ERR(arb->spmimst_clk_mux)) {
> +               err = PTR_ERR(arb->spmimst_clk_mux);
> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get mux: %d\n", err);
> +               goto err_put_ctrl;
> +       }

Since you don't really ever address the clocks individually, can you
consider using devm_clk_bulk_get?

> +
> +       err = clk_prepare_enable(arb->pmif_sys_ck);
> +       if (err) {
> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "fail to enable ap clk\n");
> +               goto err_put_ctrl;
> +       }
> +
> +       err = clk_prepare_enable(arb->pmif_tmr_ck);
> +       if (err) {
> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "fail to enable tmr clk.\n");
> +               goto err_clk_1;
> +       }
> +
> +       err = clk_prepare_enable(arb->spmimst_clk_mux);
> +       if (err) {
> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "fail to enable spmi master clk.\n");
> +               goto err_clk_2;
> +       }

clk_bulk_prepare_enable

> +
> +       arb->chan.ch_sta = PMIF_SWINF_0_STA + (PMIF_CHAN_OFFSET * arb->soc_chan);
> +       arb->chan.wdata = PMIF_SWINF_0_WDATA_31_0 + (PMIF_CHAN_OFFSET * arb->soc_chan);
> +       arb->chan.rdata = PMIF_SWINF_0_RDATA_31_0 + (PMIF_CHAN_OFFSET * arb->soc_chan);
> +       arb->chan.ch_send = PMIF_SWINF_0_ACC + (PMIF_CHAN_OFFSET * arb->soc_chan);
> +       arb->chan.ch_rdy = PMIF_SWINF_0_VLD_CLR + (PMIF_CHAN_OFFSET * arb->soc_chan);
> +
> +       raw_spin_lock_init(&arb->lock);
> +
> +       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ctrl);
> +
> +       err = spmi_controller_add(ctrl);
> +       if (err)
> +               goto err_domain_remove;
> +
> +       return 0;
> +
> +err_domain_remove:
> +       clk_disable_unprepare(arb->spmimst_clk_mux);
> +err_clk_2:
> +       clk_disable_unprepare(arb->pmif_tmr_ck);
> +err_clk_1:
> +       clk_disable_unprepare(arb->pmif_sys_ck);
> +err_put_ctrl:
> +       spmi_controller_put(ctrl);
> +       return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_spmi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +       struct spmi_controller *ctrl = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +

You probably want to disable the 3 clocks here.


> +       spmi_controller_remove(ctrl);
> +       spmi_controller_put(ctrl);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id mtk_spmi_match_table[] = {
> +       {
> +               .compatible = "mediatek,mt6873-spmi",
> +               .data = &mt6873_pmif_arb,
> +       }, {
> +               /* sentinel */
> +       },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_spmi_match_table);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver mtk_spmi_driver = {
> +       .driver         = {
> +               .name   = "spmi-mtk",
> +               .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(mtk_spmi_match_table),
> +       },
> +       .probe          = mtk_spmi_probe,
> +       .remove         = mtk_spmi_remove,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(mtk_spmi_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MediaTek SPMI Driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> --
> 2.18.0
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-05  7:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-23  2:44 [PATCH v5 0/4] Add SPMI support for Mediatek MT6873/8192 SoC IC Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-12-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: spmi: modify the constraint 'maxItems' to 'minItems' Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-12-23 17:47   ` Rob Herring
2020-12-31 15:39   ` Rob Herring
2020-12-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: spmi: document binding for the Mediatek SPMI controller Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-12-23 17:47   ` Rob Herring
2020-12-31 15:41   ` Rob Herring
2020-12-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] spmi: mediatek: Add support for MT6873/8192 Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2021-01-05  7:40   ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-12-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] arm64: dts: mt8192: add spmi node Hsin-Hsiung Wang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).