From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A9BC433DB for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 18:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D267764F24 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 18:46:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231126AbhBZSqe (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:46:34 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50090 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230198AbhBZSqd (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:46:33 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35806C06178B for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:45:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id b21so6743933pgk.7 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:45:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references :subject:from:cc:to:date:message-id:user-agent; bh=DBoA2He9SEqhdRcPOlTnH+Nc/7DBERZF0m92VCsk5jg=; b=CzJVOB5XbthY815YrFZTz7okvWCudKfguVepSsM2rE3KYhtOgjo2ubtDOYd5wNc72k XY6VCuLMoPa54b3C7TryZmXhSZ8X5audeV9KDQ//qkvVW1wKfoMxIYKafr6rUMh9ai1H oohes+uH3rsg4+jHnrw+wqm+oySYwZiIIQWu0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:references:subject:from:cc:to:date:message-id :user-agent; bh=DBoA2He9SEqhdRcPOlTnH+Nc/7DBERZF0m92VCsk5jg=; b=hqdj79l9JeHC/2dc3i3fzbegdnvf4E2Ck8O025rZzO+8PZ/5CgidwdpKA3wNUFJow5 ZSS+8p3l2H/TKFdodUcbpCgE/viYIh/4HPx26GNh8MfXD7QwJG0DbP5a9YINs+d3lVpx lk23ky3mwINgnu5CScbMuyvFKWGKFU1oRbQ83OwbxoCbG3xNcDpHLw1GWHjK9ZtICOk5 x4vDcX5fFNmwfEWoQpAmmMakmkkPps7iX9wtZMX1O+bes5QsQt0FGeG3tX8j64VWkoou xAsk5LMHZPNevNqtgMj5n1iE7RYzrpyZ+N2uFe33O4LSmhXAiqgt6ZQiKzA3W0H+y6Ww sx0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qWK9gkqVLUfZlkeoQAMmTziU8+JDhCM+rkbjmV2lO+I+v4LVf 1SVhInB2dzMTeb2d3ZCjHjb5Vw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxpirRBN68cTs6BEm0/4bx76H7nG+Xarluh7zIVCuqEiGatxHFPfwy6XtpjUIQW3RvhGFHKFg== X-Received: by 2002:a62:6006:0:b029:1dd:3af9:965f with SMTP id u6-20020a6260060000b02901dd3af9965fmr4635727pfb.30.1614365144799; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:45:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from chromium.org ([2620:15c:202:201:e8bb:5726:f58b:4e37]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 125sm10684127pfu.7.2021.02.26.10.45.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:45:44 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: References: <161428185152.1254594.1426736986245389798@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add device tree node for LLCC From: Stephen Boyd Cc: Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Rajendra Nayak , Sibi Sankar To: Sai Prakash Ranjan Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:45:42 -0800 Message-ID: <161436514295.1254594.2789904935200051795@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: alot/0.9.1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-26 00:04:27) > On 2021-02-26 01:07, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-25 01:30:19) > >> Add a DT node for Last level cache (aka. system cache) > >> controller which provides control over the last level > >> cache present on SC7280 SoC. > >>=20 > >> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan > >> --- > >=20 > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd > >=20 > > Should add system-cache-controller to the devicetree spec. Or just use > > cache-controller for the node name. >=20 > This was as per discussion in [1][2] where dt-schema throws an error > since it expects cache-level to be associated with cache-controller. >=20 Ah right. Can you add system-cache-controller to the dt spec?