From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CE2C433B4 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 00:17:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC49611C1 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 00:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229480AbhDHAR6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 20:17:58 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42898 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230099AbhDHAR6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 20:17:58 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D35E861028; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 00:17:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1617841067; bh=IxDOHTznazS0sHmaxjBKvqgDcaH3O8uB/LMzvsivkb0=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=hUnJ95LES2v5NYg2zTqB3d2aQRsREpBBej//+kzG0Y5cL4bJUszPmF/jXkWL+8MdY MVjMTB+J2k6qjVDQGCxTJLA+tu0qo6qEyz3mU4y8HhcMIN0uidj8mAhZQn48/0cuVC +Bzesmd25bI98QYQkp7S0EBY+DhazZFJra4YtTN424DBsOBMb2Dxm5R/BFL2eewrf8 EE0JOG5Mz0zzDpBaKgD7JdjK1y8rWMVVxnGRdtEbb6+5cngHTiDSQ2h8uiyg2i0rRT 5bmrXoEHKg00uDkKl+ENNUEOPK4K/X424csMQhli+cSk9osxq62N7H9isCWG5/kYzZ yQN1gmE4RBemQ== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20210405224743.590029-31-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> References: <20210405224743.590029-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> <20210405224743.590029-31-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 30/33] clk: qcom: gcc-sc8180x: use ARRAY_SIZE instead of specifying num_parents From: Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Dmitry Baryshkov , Michael Turquette Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 17:17:46 -0700 Message-ID: <161784106675.3790633.2192275244361069326@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: alot/0.9.1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2021-04-05 15:47:40) > Use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of manually specifying num_parents. This makes > adding/removing entries to/from parent_data easy and errorproof. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov > --- Applied to clk-next