linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: harigovi@codeaurora.org
To: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
Cc: "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	MSM <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	freedreno <freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	nganji@codeaurora.org, Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	kalyan_t@codeaurora.org,
	"Kristian H. Kristensen" <hoegsberg@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [v1] drm/msm/dsi/pll: call vco set rate explicitly
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:28:12 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d201377996e16ce25acb640867e1214@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOCk7NoCH9p9gOd7as=ty-EMeerAAhQtKZa8f2wZrDeV2LtGrw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2020-02-07 19:40, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:38 AM <harigovi@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On 2020-02-06 20:29, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:13 AM Harigovindan P <harigovi@codeaurora.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> For a given byte clock, if VCO recalc value is exactly same as
>> >> vco set rate value, vco_set_rate does not get called assuming
>> >> VCO is already set to required value. But Due to GDSC toggle,
>> >> VCO values are erased in the HW. To make sure VCO is programmed
>> >> correctly, we forcefully call set_rate from vco_prepare.
>> >
>> > Is this specific to certain SoCs? I don't think I've observed this.
>> 
>> As far as Qualcomm SOCs are concerned, since pll is analog and the 
>> value
>> is directly read from hardware if we get recalc value same as set rate
>> value, the vco_set_rate will not be invoked. We checked in our idp
>> device which has the same SOC but it works there since the rates are
>> different.
> 
> This doesn't seem to be an answer to my question.  What Qualcomm SoCs
> does this issue apply to?  Everything implementing the 10nm pll?  One
> specific SoC?  I don't believe I've seen this on MSM8998, nor SDM845,
> so I'm interested to know what is the actual impact here.  I don't see
> an "IDP" SoC in the IP catalog, so I really have no idea what you are
> referring to.


This is not 10nm specific. It is applicable for other nms also.
Its specific to the frequency being set. If vco_recalc returns the same 
value as being set by vco_set_rate,
vco_set_rate will not be invoked second time onwards.

For example: Lets take below devices:

Cheza is based on SDM845 which is 10nm only.
Clk frequency:206016
dsi_pll_10nm_vco_set_rate - DSI PLL0 rate=1236096000
dsi_pll_10nm_vco_recalc_rate - DSI PLL0 returning vco rate = 1236095947

Trogdor is based on sc7180 which is also 10nm.
Clk frequency:69300
dsi_pll_10nm_vco_set_rate - DSI PLL0 rate=1663200000
dsi_pll_10nm_vco_recalc_rate - DSI PLL0 returning vco rate = 1663200000

In same trogdor device, we slightly changed the clock frequency and the 
values actually differ which will not cause any issue.
Clk frequency:69310
dsi_pll_10nm_vco_set_rate - DSI PLL0 rate=1663440000
dsi_pll_10nm_vco_recalc_rate - DSI PLL0 returning vco rate = 1663439941

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-11  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-06  9:12 [v1] drm/msm/dsi/pll: call vco set rate explicitly Harigovindan P
2020-02-06 14:59 ` [Freedreno] " Jeffrey Hugo
2020-02-07 12:38   ` harigovi
2020-02-07 14:10     ` Jeffrey Hugo
2020-02-11  5:58       ` harigovi [this message]
2020-02-11 15:44         ` Rob Clark
2020-02-11 15:59           ` Jeffrey Hugo
2020-02-12  0:28             ` Rob Clark
2020-02-12  4:05               ` Jeffrey Hugo
2020-02-12  5:10                 ` Rob Clark
2020-02-17 10:42                   ` harigovi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1d201377996e16ce25acb640867e1214@codeaurora.org \
    --to=harigovi@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hoegsberg@chromium.org \
    --cc=jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com \
    --cc=kalyan_t@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nganji@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).