linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
	Franky Lin <franky.lin@broadcom.com>,
	Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@broadcom.com>,
	Chi-Hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@cypress.com>,
	Wright Feng <wright.feng@cypress.com>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, faiz_abbas@ti.com,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com,
	brcm80211-dev-list@cypress.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Issue with Broadcom wireless in 5.2rc1 (was Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: queue work after sdhci_defer_done())
Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 08:21:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190526122136.GA26456@basecamp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190524154958.GB16322@basecamp>

+ Broadcom wireless maintainers

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:49:58AM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 03:17:13PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > On 24/05/19 2:10 PM, Brian Masney wrote:
> > > WiFi stopped working on the LG Nexus 5 phone and the issue was bisected
> > > to the commit c07a48c26519 ("mmc: sdhci: Remove finish_tasklet") that
> > > moved from using a tasklet to a work queue. That patch also changed
> > > sdhci_irq() to return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD instead of finishing the work when
> > > sdhci_defer_done() is true. Change it to queue work to the complete work
> > > queue if sdhci_defer_done() is true so that the functionality is
> > > equilivent to what was there when the finish_tasklet was present. This
> > > corrects the WiFi breakage on the Nexus 5 phone.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
> > > Fixes: c07a48c26519 ("mmc: sdhci: Remove finish_tasklet")
> > > ---
> > > [ ... ]
> > > 
> > >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > index 97158344b862..3563c3bc57c9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > @@ -3115,7 +3115,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > >  			continue;
> > >  
> > >  		if (sdhci_defer_done(host, mrq)) {
> > > -			result = IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> > > +			queue_work(host->complete_wq, &host->complete_work);
> > 
> > The IRQ thread has a lot less latency than the work queue, which is why it
> > is done that way.
> > 
> > I am not sure why you say this change is equivalent to what was there
> > before, nor why it fixes your problem.
> > 
> > Can you explain some more?
>
> [ ... ]
> 
> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c calls
> sdio_claim_host() and it appears to never return.

When the brcmfmac driver is loaded, the firmware is requested from disk,
and that's when the deadlock occurs in 5.2rc1. Specifically:

1) brcmf_sdio_download_firmware() in
   drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c calls
   sdio_claim_host()

2) brcmf_sdio_firmware_callback() is called and brcmf_sdiod_ramrw()
   tries to claim the host, but has to wait since its already claimed
   in #1 and the deadlock occurs.

I tried to release the host before the firmware is requested, however
parts of brcmf_chip_set_active() needs the host to be claimed, and a
similar deadlock occurs in brcmf_sdiod_ramrw() if I claim the host
before calling brcmf_chip_set_active().

I started to look at moving the sdio_{claim,release}_host() calls out of
brcmf_sdiod_ramrw() but there's a fair number of callers, so I'd like to
get feedback about the best course of action here.

Brian

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-26 12:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-24 11:10 [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: queue work after sdhci_defer_done() Brian Masney
2019-05-24 12:17 ` Adrian Hunter
2019-05-24 13:02   ` Brian Masney
2019-05-24 15:49   ` Brian Masney
2019-05-26 12:21     ` Brian Masney [this message]
2019-05-26 18:42       ` Issue with Broadcom wireless in 5.2rc1 (was Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: queue work after sdhci_defer_done()) Arend Van Spriel
2019-05-26 19:58         ` Brian Masney
2019-05-27  7:48           ` Adrian Hunter
2019-05-27  9:37           ` Brian Masney
2019-05-27 12:08             ` Adrian Hunter
2019-05-27 12:50               ` Brian Masney
2019-05-28 20:11                 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-06-04 11:33               ` Arend Van Spriel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190526122136.GA26456@basecamp \
    --to=masneyb@onstation.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
    --cc=brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com \
    --cc=brcm80211-dev-list@cypress.com \
    --cc=chi-hsien.lin@cypress.com \
    --cc=faiz_abbas@ti.com \
    --cc=franky.lin@broadcom.com \
    --cc=hante.meuleman@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=wright.feng@cypress.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).