Re: [PATCH -next] cpufreq: qcom-hw: remove set but not used variable 'prev_cc'

[Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>]

On 22-08-19, 10:25, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> @YueHaibing thanks for the patch.
> 
> On 2019-08-22 08:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 21-08-19, 20:14, YueHaibing wrote:
> > > drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c: In function
> > > qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut:
> > > drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c:89:38: warning:
> > >  variable prev_cc set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> > > 
> > > It is not used since commit 3003e75a5045 ("cpufreq:
> > > qcom-hw: Update logic to detect turbo frequency")
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 3 +--
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > > b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > > index 3eea197..a9ae2f8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device
> > > *cpu_dev,
> > >  				    struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > >  				    void __iomem *base)
> > >  {
> > > -	u32 data, src, lval, i, core_count, prev_cc = 0, prev_freq = 0,
> > > freq;
> > > +	u32 data, src, lval, i, core_count, prev_freq = 0, freq;
> > >  	u32 volt;
> > >  	struct cpufreq_frequency_table	*table;
> > > 
> > > @@ -139,7 +139,6 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct
> > > device *cpu_dev,
> > >  			break;
> > >  		}
> > > 
> > > -		prev_cc = core_count;
> > >  		prev_freq = freq;
> > >  	}
> > 
> > @Sibi, you fine with this change ? I will merge it with the original
> > patch then.
> 
> yes the changes seem fine, I missed
> removing prev_cc.

Thanks. Merged into the original patch itself.

-- 
viresh