From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8336AC00306 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 18:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B09420828 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 18:35:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="itMgs7ZG" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387812AbfIESe7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2019 14:34:59 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f195.google.com ([209.85.215.195]:46027 "EHLO mail-pg1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732714AbfIESe7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2019 14:34:59 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f195.google.com with SMTP id 4so1867022pgm.12; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 11:34:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ZchladH17lgsv+9UFv18PtcIdsrwGrcNNZH90IwFQ8o=; b=itMgs7ZGoPnYr3C6JvOpSvnTlZXckgWBCG06xyAoJfrD5f/nJCdBz9sI31US5DY9fr 8nIxteZBJdZfwIvaxuHsDfWvb0jmpbrzQDFfZwh5aBP9ZypYFhVT6FkNxH/YZ09QFzPw YmuJpvEzeooN73RKEIGfqvxc+oseedw1jAfH5tXHmW9Hc6FlsCPvwUWmPkEZ6teMZFsp KdGAO0qGisaHIt2WWe2lKsPkX9/ePkT3L7psuc7N37rf+RrACDYkn51ER6n7TiXE6ZGk yraQDigI+VplyBsvznIkVg0glVd+5ODRjR1101Z7vxb6j27k8PYTwgpeXyM1O1fFgTp6 fqFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ZchladH17lgsv+9UFv18PtcIdsrwGrcNNZH90IwFQ8o=; b=VGAWY6uwrIyUpzZxwp4AWfiDfKDgaUwcFHAe7Zh7FeK7J8ORfIWDMtTIyHlpZrm8r5 oP5OgtDiWLFO36fhc7RPaWz+nz+yK1HTgz+X7wf6+sOKL1fJ9L2NtMCQ8gCpOx4BjAhZ yyUW1Xb/uv/OgrgwD6RJdHafzaTHmpsHuuz0o8VA/A5rUeAVZkSrYw2PKcS49x2mci9B in6HQSuobsg0rDFm4i1g9xef4g73vsnJ07SGAlqDrYUSrdMf/tuJKGaDd/uddp3gQBP0 ue9BoNPpufB3ijkdarvHh6i59Pj1Ss0kbKXTCweDdxIXpa/zOzFnqXl8KLCFtB+Nr3H0 ChLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX+JN1Cqir3BvWknWDpLqbvKobmymVwHzr/lzC2hdhx7Or8SGZS SLiUA+FguZjyKcmsCtrgqdE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy/t5vBCfjhGG2s/eNLQYwTQm9fpGAbsf1pVpfeajEUDUd+g2t2m1D3Xn/F9fplSwH9HQ2jrQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:e306:: with SMTP id f6mr4383827pgh.39.1567708498878; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 11:34:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l23sm3252427pjy.3.2019.09.05.11.34.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Sep 2019 11:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 11:34:56 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, agross@kernel.org, wim@linux-watchdog.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: qcom: support pre-timeout when the bark irq is available Message-ID: <20190905183456.GA29500@roeck-us.net> References: <20190905182419.26539-1-jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190905182419.26539-1-jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 08:24:19PM +0200, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote: > Use the bark interrupt as the pre-timeout notifier whenever this > interrupt is available. > > By default, the pretimeout notification shall occur one second earlier > than the timeout. > > Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz Can you please give people time to reply before flooding the mailing list with revisions ? This is getting annoying quite rapidly. I am going to reply to v2, as I had started on that already (and to the one without subject before). Guenter