From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23F2FC6197 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 22:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD87421848 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 22:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="ew2au96e"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="jV1A3uZA" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727647AbfKHWQk (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Nov 2019 17:16:40 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:57500 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726095AbfKHWQk (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Nov 2019 17:16:40 -0500 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9299F609EF; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 22:16:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1573251398; bh=NHLqhu3lBLa2cW4RgrQ6UYgyY+0N7hfT2ycG75uhyXs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ew2au96ev9JvlKbyA2nsvPhukZFE5v52MuRPR6/qN0SaShCVVwhh3l9pkRnUnMf3p pnW35bM3evRrN+ElX7fmvta6NE2dW/I2lxRaRfTU/bFvf6VnMMMq9Rdifz/8CTVeMX eLMUQo+nyK7zSwNXPvXs9IDa11MK6WDOpy5Am4B8= Received: from localhost (i-global254.qualcomm.com [199.106.103.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ilina@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 886D160AD9; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 22:16:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1573251397; bh=NHLqhu3lBLa2cW4RgrQ6UYgyY+0N7hfT2ycG75uhyXs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jV1A3uZAgYLchlChqAFcX1FWlWGyIPn2+HV74H9/CUtAd6je6U1yUsCrVmUboZSuh T2OEPNWOpYttsF7kdwzd11eOZeMIx4Tr53/tSJsHPuGncx/lfLDqHGmRDnyeRTZdoK PpRZvULo8cEsD2Cq48NS6qXfhrF/x+ZLQYA//RFU= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 886D160AD9 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ilina@codeaurora.org Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:16:36 -0700 From: Lina Iyer To: Doug Anderson Cc: Stephen Boyd , Evan Green , maz@kernel.org, LinusW , LKML , linux-arm-msm , Bjorn Andersson , mkshah@codeaurora.org, "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 04/14] drivers: irqchip: add PDC irqdomain for wakeup capable GPIOs Message-ID: <20191108221636.GH16900@codeaurora.org> References: <1568411962-1022-1-git-send-email-ilina@codeaurora.org> <1568411962-1022-5-git-send-email-ilina@codeaurora.org> <20191108215424.GG16900@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191108215424.GG16900@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 08 2019 at 14:54 -0700, Lina Iyer wrote: >On Fri, Nov 08 2019 at 14:22 -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: >>Hi, >> >>On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:00 PM Lina Iyer wrote: >>> >>>diff --git a/include/linux/soc/qcom/irq.h b/include/linux/soc/qcom/irq.h >>>new file mode 100644 >>>index 0000000..85ac4b6 >>>--- /dev/null >>>+++ b/include/linux/soc/qcom/irq.h >>>@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ >>>+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ >>>+ >>>+#ifndef __QCOM_IRQ_H >>>+#define __QCOM_IRQ_H >>>+ >> >>I happened to be looking at a pile of patches and one of them added: >> >>+#include >> >>...right here. If/when you spin your patch, maybe you should too? At >>the moment the patch I was looking at is at: >> >>https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+log/refs/heads/android-mainline-tracking >> >>Specifically: >> >>https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+/448e2302f82a70f52475b6fc32bbe30301052e6b >> >> >Sure, will take care of it in the next spin. > Checking for this, it seems like it would not be needed by this header. There is nothing in this file that would need that header. It was probably a older version that pulled into that tree. Is there a reason now that you see this need? --Lina