From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A03BC35247 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 20:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352FF21D7D for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 20:46:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581021987; bh=Fd2YhmJXyHWICE9xLRUhbR43QWIjp3P2ufjVNviVWns=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=tnHOk8wuEQCo7pxOfzZrFelYLuK9/36eN/16nTZqjlpUWRTgakLKNrsUX18xbcR7B K/NO+5Xp65V6SzSTJONXQ6bEP91A6kxf4Vk6K0YqoUi9cdsbDsAmmDmWy1Jpljnyf8 Q4N0SmUtSnEI0FXadzsnfYpZRQbUFM+2PyWiwE10= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728230AbgBFUq0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:46:26 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f195.google.com ([209.85.210.195]:35955 "EHLO mail-pf1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728212AbgBFUqV (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:46:21 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f195.google.com with SMTP id 185so59054pfv.3; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 12:46:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ug/wlo0Kk7ZmWuOhLjsGf8WpCyfYM5yOAezTl3oLxGE=; b=PKgrnsV5MKiUZIMMv8THQCJTRF/OfN/A2C2Uz0slq+rnPdh1JeeJtHSPDRphIcio+0 MeryKD3yM6dqE/SC+j55EOXV7JQw2OXW675E3qs8H7PFZBr6cmQ9I5k1ePyMMMhOZT/3 nDaScFYIicxyK8eJel8Rur3dtlwKwb/FgIKWZICxE42HbkuK34vj3c6hh350lY02D5N+ HcK0hHtqk7lz+99hEYwPJA/eO/DqYbDIXbHROjZDPZrDBpJdM37llOW+vUWlL3tyCq3m QWQRUdmdW78uFj4dZOvy5QrN7S5RT+fYv2+ZN86VMFyQ4hDwVUMGrDIT2mv/UsZ1JqnX Bwxw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVfOduh9fRLaV0hRJzxa0/+wc3yxYkGsQZnY3HZLEeFl4cDvUS0 6e3B8v203iB7SxQ5jm9QCA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzR75X0SOO8/Ci8hfXh+3pGKYvyPgI2KQi3sQN7ajgY/oC7QShvBli/8QrnOI53l84UKQeUKg== X-Received: by 2002:a65:4d0d:: with SMTP id i13mr3719314pgt.346.1581021981006; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 12:46:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from rob-hp-laptop (63-158-47-182.dia.static.qwest.net. [63.158.47.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a21sm287558pgd.12.2020.02.06.12.46.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Feb 2020 12:46:19 -0800 (PST) Received: (nullmailer pid 28310 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 06 Feb 2020 19:15:32 -0000 Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 19:15:32 +0000 From: Rob Herring To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Ansuel Smith , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Wim Van Sebroeck , Mark Rutland , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: watchdog: qcom-wdt: Remove deprecated compatible Message-ID: <20200206191532.GA24542@bogus> References: <20200204152104.13278-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> <20200204152104.13278-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> <20200204160958.GB17320@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200204160958.GB17320@roeck-us.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 08:09:58AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 04:21:02PM +0100, Ansuel Smith wrote: > > "qcom,kpss-wdt-msm8960" > > "qcom,kpss-wdt-apq8064" > > "qcom,kpss-wdt-ipq8064" > > "qcom,kpss-wdt-ipq4019" > > > > and deprectaed and not used in the driver code at all. Drop them and > > fix the example. > > > Rob may correct me, but I don't think you can just remove > deprecated properties. It doesn't matter if the driver supports > it or not; after all, DT property descriptions are supposed > to be OS independent. Right. Also, there's a conversion of this to schema under review, so it will need to be refactored if not dropped. Rob