From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DACC35E01 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:56:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085DC218AC for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:56:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582638995; bh=HsjJvbTH+q59fYeim5ErNffTAszwiuMCgtA22AZPS8Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=hpPVBnZrjo+NsimwU83tdAMTwsk/gxzKnD/1Rjn67VL/Gpxd51t/DEAINeZiS1Ak/ U34BnyrJUQqWVbOejM+8xiBtnjaIpAGi5Q2UGbLO0/BbSL8b6fyJTfHjrPudri1ht8 t3byDHLKXsNLZozMYNu/8lDRbOiDZIPssEawMMeo= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730089AbgBYN4e (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 08:56:34 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34472 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729287AbgBYN4e (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 08:56:34 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [122.167.120.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14BBC218AC; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:56:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582638992; bh=HsjJvbTH+q59fYeim5ErNffTAszwiuMCgtA22AZPS8Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=HyufZEX6mJzQQ2vyo28R4iOHwTgc0pv8EAHYQTNtjGO44+qp3Nxhoa+Ku9yap4mA9 SQyzxEqPclvtceqUOlyz3nWTCs8/6LkNvYArUGMMe//cvZIvTHDSzYFUuP4rGm2zxD tvvcHlC5eYRKSusIbkPuSzIfwIdXtSbSF1pQbaao= Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 19:26:28 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Amit Kucheria Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, sivaa@codeaurora.org, Andy Gross , Zhang Rui , Amit Kucheria , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add entry for sc7180 tsens to binding Message-ID: <20200225135628.GP2618@vkoul-mobl> References: <3e760279e7152825d56f8b35160a9a55a5083ce1.1582632110.git.amit.kucheria@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3e760279e7152825d56f8b35160a9a55a5083ce1.1582632110.git.amit.kucheria@linaro.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 25-02-20, 17:38, Amit Kucheria wrote: > The qcom-tsens binding requires a SoC-specific and a TSENS > family-specific binding to be specified in the compatible string. > > Since qcom,sc7180-tsens is not listed in the YAML binding, we see the > following warnings in 'make dtbs_check'. Fix them. > > builds/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dt.yaml: > thermal-sensor@c263000: compatible: ['qcom,sc7180-tsens', > 'qcom,tsens-v2'] is not valid under any of the given schemas (Possible > causes of the failure): > builds/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dt.yaml: > thermal-sensor@c263000: compatible:0: 'qcom,sc7180-tsens' is not one of > ['qcom,msm8916-tsens', 'qcom,msm8974-tsens'] > builds/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dt.yaml: > thermal-sensor@c263000: compatible:0: 'qcom,sc7180-tsens' is not one of > ['qcom,msm8976-tsens', 'qcom,qcs404-tsens'] > builds/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dt.yaml: > thermal-sensor@c263000: compatible:0: 'qcom,sc7180-tsens' is not one of > ['qcom,msm8996-tsens', 'qcom,msm8998-tsens', 'qcom,sdm845-tsens'] > builds/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dt.yaml: > thermal-sensor@c263000: compatible:1: 'qcom,tsens-v0_1' was expected > builds/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dt.yaml: > thermal-sensor@c263000: compatible:1: 'qcom,tsens-v1' was expected > > builds/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dt.yaml: > thermal-sensor@c265000: compatible: ['qcom,sc7180-tsens', > 'qcom,tsens-v2'] is not valid under any of the given schemas (Possible > causes of the failure): > builds/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dt.yaml: > thermal-sensor@c265000: compatible:0: 'qcom,sc7180-tsens' is not one of > ['qcom,msm8916-tsens', 'qcom,msm8974-tsens'] > builds/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dt.yaml: > thermal-sensor@c265000: compatible:0: 'qcom,sc7180-tsens' is not one of > ['qcom,msm8976-tsens', 'qcom,qcs404-tsens'] > builds/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dt.yaml: > thermal-sensor@c265000: compatible:0: 'qcom,sc7180-tsens' is not one of > ['qcom,msm8996-tsens', 'qcom,msm8998-tsens', 'qcom,sdm845-tsens'] > builds/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dt.yaml: > thermal-sensor@c265000: compatible:1: 'qcom,tsens-v0_1' was expected > builds/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dt.yaml: > thermal-sensor@c265000: compatible:1: 'qcom,tsens-v1' was expected Reviewed-by: Vinod Koul > > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml > index eef13b9446a8..13e294328932 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ properties: > - qcom,msm8996-tsens > - qcom,msm8998-tsens > - qcom,sdm845-tsens > + - qcom,sc7180-tsens > - const: qcom,tsens-v2 > > reg: > -- > 2.20.1 -- ~Vinod