From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23594C4332D for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 09:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14A620767 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 09:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727244AbgCTJO0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 05:14:26 -0400 Received: from 8bytes.org ([81.169.241.247]:54250 "EHLO theia.8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727210AbgCTJO0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 05:14:26 -0400 Received: by theia.8bytes.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2A1AE451; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:14:21 +0100 (CET) From: Joerg Roedel To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, guohanjun@huawei.com, Sudeep Holla , Rob Clark , Sean Paul , Will Deacon , Robin Murphy , Joerg Roedel , Matthias Brugger , Thierry Reding , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Joerg Roedel Subject: [PATCH v3 10/15] iommu/arm-smmu: Use accessor functions for iommu private data Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:14:09 +0100 Message-Id: <20200320091414.3941-11-joro@8bytes.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200320091414.3941-1-joro@8bytes.org> References: <20200320091414.3941-1-joro@8bytes.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org From: Joerg Roedel Make use of dev_iommu_priv_set/get() functions and simplify the code where possible with this change. Tested-by: Will Deacon # arm-smmu Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel --- drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c index 980aae73b45b..7aa36e6c19c0 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c @@ -98,12 +98,15 @@ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg { s16 smendx[]; }; #define INVALID_SMENDX -1 -#define __fwspec_cfg(fw) ((struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *)fw->iommu_priv) -#define fwspec_smmu(fw) (__fwspec_cfg(fw)->smmu) -#define fwspec_smendx(fw, i) \ - (i >= fw->num_ids ? INVALID_SMENDX : __fwspec_cfg(fw)->smendx[i]) -#define for_each_cfg_sme(fw, i, idx) \ - for (i = 0; idx = fwspec_smendx(fw, i), i < fw->num_ids; ++i) +#define __fwspec_cfg(dev) ((struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *)dev_iommu_priv_get(dev)) +#define fwspec_smmu(dev) (__fwspec_cfg(dev)->smmu) +#define fwspec_smendx(dev, i) \ + (i >= dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev)->num_ids ? \ + INVALID_SMENDX : \ + __fwspec_cfg(dev)->smendx[i]) +#define for_each_cfg_sme(dev, i, idx) \ + for (i = 0; idx = fwspec_smendx(dev, i), \ + i < dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev)->num_ids; ++i) static bool using_legacy_binding, using_generic_binding; @@ -1061,7 +1064,7 @@ static bool arm_smmu_free_sme(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int idx) static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev) { struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); - struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv; + struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = cfg->smmu; struct arm_smmu_smr *smrs = smmu->smrs; struct iommu_group *group; @@ -1069,7 +1072,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev) mutex_lock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex); /* Figure out a viable stream map entry allocation */ - for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) { + for_each_cfg_sme(dev, i, idx) { u16 sid = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_ID, fwspec->ids[i]); u16 mask = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_MASK, fwspec->ids[i]); @@ -1100,7 +1103,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev) iommu_group_put(group); /* It worked! Now, poke the actual hardware */ - for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) { + for_each_cfg_sme(dev, i, idx) { arm_smmu_write_sme(smmu, idx); smmu->s2crs[idx].group = group; } @@ -1117,14 +1120,14 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev) return ret; } -static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec) +static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct device *dev) { - struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec); - struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv; + struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = fwspec_smmu(dev); int i, idx; mutex_lock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex); - for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) { + for_each_cfg_sme(dev, i, idx) { if (arm_smmu_free_sme(smmu, idx)) arm_smmu_write_sme(smmu, idx); cfg->smendx[i] = INVALID_SMENDX; @@ -1133,7 +1136,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec) } static int arm_smmu_domain_add_master(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain, - struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec) + struct device *dev) { struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu; struct arm_smmu_s2cr *s2cr = smmu->s2crs; @@ -1146,7 +1149,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_add_master(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain, else type = S2CR_TYPE_TRANS; - for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) { + for_each_cfg_sme(dev, i, idx) { if (type == s2cr[idx].type && cbndx == s2cr[idx].cbndx) continue; @@ -1160,10 +1163,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_add_master(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain, static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev) { - int ret; + struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain); struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); struct arm_smmu_device *smmu; - struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain); + int ret; if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops) { dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to SMMU, is it on the same bus?\n"); @@ -1177,10 +1180,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev) * domains, just say no (but more politely than by dereferencing NULL). * This should be at least a WARN_ON once that's sorted. */ - if (!fwspec->iommu_priv) + if (!dev_iommu_priv_get(dev)) return -ENODEV; - smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec); + smmu = fwspec_smmu(dev); ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu); if (ret < 0) @@ -1204,7 +1207,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev) } /* Looks ok, so add the device to the domain */ - ret = arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, fwspec); + ret = arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, dev); /* * Setup an autosuspend delay to avoid bouncing runpm state. @@ -1429,7 +1432,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev) goto out_free; cfg->smmu = smmu; - fwspec->iommu_priv = cfg; + dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, cfg); while (i--) cfg->smendx[i] = INVALID_SMENDX; @@ -1467,7 +1470,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev) if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops) return; - cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv; + cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); smmu = cfg->smmu; ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu); @@ -1475,23 +1478,23 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev) return; iommu_device_unlink(&smmu->iommu, dev); - arm_smmu_master_free_smes(fwspec); + arm_smmu_master_free_smes(dev); arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu); + dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, NULL); iommu_group_remove_device(dev); - kfree(fwspec->iommu_priv); + kfree(cfg); iommu_fwspec_free(dev); } static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev) { - struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); - struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec); + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = fwspec_smmu(dev); struct iommu_group *group = NULL; int i, idx; - for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) { + for_each_cfg_sme(dev, i, idx) { if (group && smmu->s2crs[idx].group && group != smmu->s2crs[idx].group) return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); -- 2.17.1