linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
	asutoshd@codeaurora.org, stummala@codeaurora.org,
	sayalil@codeaurora.org, rampraka@codeaurora.org,
	vbadigan@codeaurora.org, sboyd@kernel.org,
	georgi.djakov@linaro.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, agross@kernel.org,
	linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org,
	Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v6 1/2] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add interconnect bus bandwidth scaling support
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 11:49:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200323184936.GC204494@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1584973502-14775-2-git-send-email-ppvk@codeaurora.org>

Hi Pradeep,

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 07:55:01PM +0530, Pradeep P V K wrote:
> Add interconnect bandwidths for SDHC driver using OPP framework that
> is required by SDHC driver based on the clock frequency and bus width
> of the card. Otherwise, the system clocks may run at minimum clock
> speed and thus affecting the performance.
> 
> This change is based on
> [RFC] mmc: host: sdhci-msm: Use the interconnect API
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/11/499) and
> 
> [PATCH v6] Introduce Bandwidth OPPs for interconnects
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/6/740)
> 
> Co-developed-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
> Co-developed-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
> Co-developed-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@codeaurora.org>
> Co-developed-by: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> 
> RFC v5 -> v6:
> - Added new goto jump tag to put both icc paths.
> - Removed bus vote data error check and added is_null check.
> - Addressed minor code style comments.
> 
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 240 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 236 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> index 09ff731..469db65 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>
> ...
>
> +/*
> + * Helper function to parse the exact OPP node
> + * Returns OPP pointer on success else NULL on error
> + */
> +static struct dev_pm_opp
> +		*sdhci_msm_find_opp_for_freq(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host,
> +							unsigned long bw)
> +{
> +	struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
> +	struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(msm_host->mmc);
> +	unsigned int freq = bw;
> +	struct device *dev = &msm_host->pdev->dev;
> +
> +

delete one empty line

> +	if (!freq)
> +		opp = dev_pm_opp_find_peak_bw_floor(dev, &freq);
> +	else
> +		opp = dev_pm_opp_find_peak_bw_exact(dev, freq, true);
> +
> +	/* Max bandwidth vote */
> +	if (PTR_ERR(opp) == -ERANGE && freq > sdhci_msm_get_max_clock(host))
> +		opp = dev_pm_opp_find_peak_bw_ceil(dev, &bw);
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to find OPP for freq:%u err:%ld\n",
> +				freq, PTR_ERR(opp));
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +	return opp;
> +}
>
> ...
>
> +/*
> + * Helper function to register for OPP and interconnect
> + * frameworks.
> + */
> +static struct sdhci_msm_bus_vote_data
> +		*sdhci_msm_bus_register(struct sdhci_msm_host *host,
> +				struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct sdhci_msm_bus_vote_data *vote_data;
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	int i, err;
> +	struct icc_path *icc_paths[BUS_INTERCONNECT_PATHS];
> +	const char *path_names[] = {
> +		"sdhc-ddr",
> +		"cpu-sdhc",
> +	};
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < BUS_INTERCONNECT_PATHS; i++)
> +		icc_paths[i] = of_icc_get(&pdev->dev, path_names[i]);
> +
> +	if (!icc_paths[0] && !icc_paths[1]) {
> +		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "ICC DT property is missing.Skip vote!!\n");
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < BUS_INTERCONNECT_PATHS; i++) {
> +		if (!icc_paths[i]) {
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "interconnect path '%s' is not configured\n",
> +					path_names[i]);
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			goto handle_err;
> +		}
> +		if (IS_ERR(icc_paths[i])) {
> +			err = PTR_ERR(icc_paths[i]);
> +
> +			if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +				dev_err(&pdev->dev, "interconnect path '%s' is invalid:%d\n",
> +					path_names[i], err);
> +			goto handle_err;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	err = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(dev);
> +	if (err) {
> +		if (err == -ENODEV || err == -ENODATA)
> +			dev_err(dev, "OPP dt properties missing:%d\n", err);
> +		else
> +			dev_err(dev, "OPP registration failed:%d\n", err);
> +		goto put_icc;
> +	}
> +
> +	vote_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*vote_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!vote_data) {
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto put_icc;
> +	}
> +	vote_data->sdhc_to_ddr = icc_paths[0];
> +	vote_data->cpu_to_sdhc = icc_paths[1];
> +	return vote_data;
> +
> +handle_err:
> +	if (err) {

the check for 'err' is not needed, this code is only executed when an error
is encountered.

> +		int other = (i == 0) ? 1 : 0;
> +
> +		if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(icc_paths[other]))
> +			icc_put(icc_paths[other]);
> +	}
> +	return ERR_PTR(err);
> +
> +put_icc:
> +	if (err) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < BUS_INTERCONNECT_PATHS; i++)
> +			icc_put(icc_paths[i]);
> +	}
> +	return ERR_PTR(err);

The two error paths are somewhat redundant and the 'handle_err' isn't super
clear, especially since it is disconnected from the code where the error is
found.

You could have a single handler instead:

put_icc:
	for (i = 0; i < BUS_INTERCONNECT_PATHS; i++) {
		if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(icc_paths[i]))
			icc_put(icc_paths[i]);
        }

	return ERR_PTR(err);

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-23 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-23 14:25 [RFC v6 0/2] Add SDHC interconnect bandwidth scaling Pradeep P V K
2020-03-23 14:25 ` [RFC v6 1/2] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add interconnect bus bandwidth scaling support Pradeep P V K
2020-03-23 18:49   ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2020-03-23 14:25 ` [RFC v6 2/2] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Add interconnect BW scaling strings Pradeep P V K
2020-03-26  9:22 ` [RFC v6 0/2] Add SDHC interconnect bandwidth scaling Rajendra Nayak
2020-03-26 18:33   ` Saravana Kannan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200323184936.GC204494@google.com \
    --to=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=georgi.djakov@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ppvk@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rampraka@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sayalil@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=stummala@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=vbadigan@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).