Linux-ARM-MSM Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, guohanjun@huawei.com,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/16] iommu/arm-smmu: Refactor master_cfg/fwspec usage
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 16:08:35 +0100
Message-ID: <20200326150841.10083-11-joro@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200326150841.10083-1-joro@8bytes.org>

From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

In preparation for restructuring iommu_fwspec, refactor the way we
access the arm_smmu_master_cfg private data to be less dependent on
the current layout.

Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index 980aae73b45b..3cef2bfd6f3e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -98,12 +98,10 @@ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg {
 	s16				smendx[];
 };
 #define INVALID_SMENDX			-1
-#define __fwspec_cfg(fw) ((struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *)fw->iommu_priv)
-#define fwspec_smmu(fw)  (__fwspec_cfg(fw)->smmu)
-#define fwspec_smendx(fw, i) \
-	(i >= fw->num_ids ? INVALID_SMENDX : __fwspec_cfg(fw)->smendx[i])
-#define for_each_cfg_sme(fw, i, idx) \
-	for (i = 0; idx = fwspec_smendx(fw, i), i < fw->num_ids; ++i)
+#define cfg_smendx(cfg, fw, i) \
+	(i >= fw->num_ids ? INVALID_SMENDX : cfg->smendx[i])
+#define for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fw, i, idx) \
+	for (i = 0; idx = cfg_smendx(cfg, fw, i), i < fw->num_ids; ++i)
 
 static bool using_legacy_binding, using_generic_binding;
 
@@ -1069,7 +1067,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev)
 
 	mutex_lock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
 	/* Figure out a viable stream map entry allocation */
-	for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+	for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
 		u16 sid = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_ID, fwspec->ids[i]);
 		u16 mask = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_MASK, fwspec->ids[i]);
 
@@ -1100,7 +1098,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev)
 	iommu_group_put(group);
 
 	/* It worked! Now, poke the actual hardware */
-	for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+	for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
 		arm_smmu_write_sme(smmu, idx);
 		smmu->s2crs[idx].group = group;
 	}
@@ -1117,14 +1115,14 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
+static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg,
+				      struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
 {
-	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
-	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = cfg->smmu;
 	int i, idx;
 
 	mutex_lock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
-	for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+	for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
 		if (arm_smmu_free_sme(smmu, idx))
 			arm_smmu_write_sme(smmu, idx);
 		cfg->smendx[i] = INVALID_SMENDX;
@@ -1133,6 +1131,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
 }
 
 static int arm_smmu_domain_add_master(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
+				      struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg,
 				      struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
 {
 	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
@@ -1146,7 +1145,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_add_master(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
 	else
 		type = S2CR_TYPE_TRANS;
 
-	for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+	for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
 		if (type == s2cr[idx].type && cbndx == s2cr[idx].cbndx)
 			continue;
 
@@ -1162,8 +1161,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
 {
 	int ret;
 	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
-	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
 	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
+	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
+	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
 
 	if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops) {
 		dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to SMMU, is it on the same bus?\n");
@@ -1177,10 +1177,11 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
 	 * domains, just say no (but more politely than by dereferencing NULL).
 	 * This should be at least a WARN_ON once that's sorted.
 	 */
-	if (!fwspec->iommu_priv)
+	cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+	if (!cfg)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
+	smmu = cfg->smmu;
 
 	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
 	if (ret < 0)
@@ -1204,7 +1205,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
 	}
 
 	/* Looks ok, so add the device to the domain */
-	ret = arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, fwspec);
+	ret = arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, cfg, fwspec);
 
 	/*
 	 * Setup an autosuspend delay to avoid bouncing runpm state.
@@ -1475,7 +1476,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
 		return;
 
 	iommu_device_unlink(&smmu->iommu, dev);
-	arm_smmu_master_free_smes(fwspec);
+	arm_smmu_master_free_smes(cfg, fwspec);
 
 	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
 
@@ -1487,11 +1488,12 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
 static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
-	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
+	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = cfg->smmu;
 	struct iommu_group *group = NULL;
 	int i, idx;
 
-	for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+	for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
 		if (group && smmu->s2crs[idx].group &&
 		    group != smmu->s2crs[idx].group)
 			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply index

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-26 15:08 [PATCH v4 00/16] iommu: Move iommu_fwspec out of 'struct device' Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] iommu: Define dev_iommu_fwspec_get() for !CONFIG_IOMMU_API Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] ACPI/IORT: Remove direct access of dev->iommu_fwspec Joerg Roedel
2020-03-27  3:30   ` Hanjun Guo
2020-03-27  8:45     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] drm/msm/mdp5: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] iommu/tegra-gart: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] iommu: Rename struct iommu_param to dev_iommu Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:12   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] iommu: Move iommu_fwspec to struct dev_iommu Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:12   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] iommu/arm-smmu: Fix uninitilized variable warning Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] iommu: Introduce accessors for iommu private data Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use accessor functions " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] iommu/arm-smmu: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] iommu/renesas: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] iommu/mediatek: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] iommu/qcom: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] iommu/virtio: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] iommu: Move fwspec->iommu_priv to struct dev_iommu Joerg Roedel
2020-03-27 10:16 ` [PATCH v4 00/16] iommu: Move iommu_fwspec out of 'struct device' Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200326150841.10083-11-joro@8bytes.org \
    --to=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-ARM-MSM Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/0 linux-arm-msm/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-arm-msm linux-arm-msm/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm \
		linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-arm-msm

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git