From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B231C433DF for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 17:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3A2207F7 for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 17:47:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1590083253; bh=gjOFDQGCVbKuhm8jhPpiRW9Wyk9jKG5kSGeV52TDf6g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=kOHMZh1N8q25Af6agO3pkWaIORKlQBkzWP2ZsnpdlexEExlqdFQJ3J5HD4xb9AZN1 CujAiZqK3c4hKsar8p4wSNJW1c5Olsw5M0raCz2F78nzE+uqcXCd6XUz3wF0dVKZye oKgbwbis8L1sIgC20kCSqdgc1UfDmt7xoDKx+5LE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728885AbgEURrc (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2020 13:47:32 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:54356 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727966AbgEURrb (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2020 13:47:31 -0400 Received: from willie-the-truck (236.31.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.31.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77212207F7; Thu, 21 May 2020 17:47:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1590083250; bh=gjOFDQGCVbKuhm8jhPpiRW9Wyk9jKG5kSGeV52TDf6g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=njcyq1HmKA1I0mjxEii+de1ZOsOH/zUwzOlJFe3Bw1j64/DG0+ouCdPRr1i96R3Eg AfkJIeTsVvQ3zL9RHwQDZyxn0fY8cfUUAPdFN5hud8Dkx9MBwT28kABc1OUyE2cB2K 5B+S74zVYHuTR5Sh+5h63bFEb+f76IdI0yaPZZWU= Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 18:47:25 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Doug Anderson Cc: Sharat Masetty , Robin Murphy , freedreno , dri-devel@freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm , LKML , "list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS , Joerg Roedel ," , Jordan Crouse , Sai Prakash Ranjan , Matthias Kaehlcke Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add sc7180 compatible string Message-ID: <20200521174724.GA9223@willie-the-truck> References: <1588329036-18732-1-git-send-email-smasetty@codeaurora.org> <1588329036-18732-2-git-send-email-smasetty@codeaurora.org> <20200518143920.GJ32394@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 01:59:49PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 7:39 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:05:39PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > > > On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 3:30 AM Sharat Masetty wrote: > > > > > > > > This patch simply adds a new compatible string for SC7180 platform. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sharat Masetty > > > > --- > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 1 + > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > > > > index 6515dbe..986098b 100644 > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > > > > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ properties: > > > > - enum: > > > > - qcom,msm8996-smmu-v2 > > > > - qcom,msm8998-smmu-v2 > > > > + - qcom,sc7180-smmu-v2 > > > > - qcom,sdm845-smmu-v2 > > > > - const: qcom,smmu-v2 > > > > > > Is anything blocking this patch from landing now? > > > > I thought updates to the bindings usually went via Rob and the device-tree > > tree, but neither of those are on cc. > > > > Perhaps resend with that fixed? > > Ah, I guess I wasn't familiar with how things worked for this file, or > maybe things have changed recently? I'm used to most bindings going > through the same tree as the drivers that use them. Usually if things > are at all complicated maintainers wait for an Ack from Rob (so he > should have been CCed for sure) and then land. Just to clear this up: I'm happy to take DT stuff like this, but preferably with Rob's ack so that I know that (a) it's not a load of rubbish and (b) it probably won't conflict with his tree. So having the DT folks omitted from the CC list just rings alarm bells for me. > In this case it actually looks like Bjorn landed it in the Qualcomm > and I just didn't realize it. That seems like it should be fine since > it's in the middle of a clause that's all Qualcomm and the change > shouldn't be controversial in any way. :-) Ok! Will