From: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
To: viresh.kumar@linaro.org, sboyd@kernel.org,
georgi.djakov@linaro.org, saravanak@google.com, mka@chromium.org
Cc: nm@ti.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, agross@kernel.org,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
dianders@chromium.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
amit.kucheria@linaro.org, lukasz.luba@arm.com,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, smasetty@codeaurora.org,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/5] cpufreq: qcom: Update the bandwidth levels on frequency change
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 01:51:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200527202153.11659-5-sibis@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200527202153.11659-1-sibis@codeaurora.org>
Add support to parse optional OPP table attached to the cpu node when
the OPP bandwidth values are populated. This allows for scaling of
DDR/L3 bandwidth levels with frequency change.
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
---
V5:
* Use dev_pm_opp_adjust_voltage instead [Viresh]
* Misc cleanup
v4:
* Split fast switch disable into another patch [Lukasz]
drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
index fc92a8842e252..fbd73d106a3ae 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/bitfield.h>
#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/interconnect.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
@@ -31,6 +32,52 @@
static unsigned long cpu_hw_rate, xo_rate;
static struct platform_device *global_pdev;
+static int qcom_cpufreq_set_bw(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ unsigned long freq_khz)
+{
+ unsigned long freq_hz = freq_khz * 1000;
+ struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
+ struct device *dev;
+ int ret;
+
+ dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
+ if (!dev)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact(dev, freq_hz, true);
+ if (IS_ERR(opp))
+ return PTR_ERR(opp);
+
+ ret = dev_pm_opp_set_bw(dev, opp);
+ dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int qcom_cpufreq_update_opp(struct device *cpu_dev,
+ unsigned long freq_khz,
+ unsigned long volt)
+{
+ unsigned long freq_hz = freq_khz * 1000;
+
+ if (dev_pm_opp_adjust_voltage(cpu_dev, freq_hz, volt, volt, volt))
+ return dev_pm_opp_add(cpu_dev, freq_hz, volt);
+
+ /* Enable the opp after voltage update */
+ return dev_pm_opp_enable(cpu_dev, freq_hz);
+}
+
+/* Check for optional interconnect paths on CPU0 */
+static int qcom_cpufreq_find_icc_paths(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct device *cpu_dev;
+
+ cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(0);
+ if (!cpu_dev)
+ return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+
+ return dev_pm_opp_of_find_icc_paths(cpu_dev, NULL);
+}
+
static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
@@ -39,6 +86,8 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
writel_relaxed(index, perf_state_reg);
+ qcom_cpufreq_set_bw(policy, freq);
+
arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq,
policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
return 0;
@@ -88,12 +137,30 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
{
u32 data, src, lval, i, core_count, prev_freq = 0, freq;
u32 volt;
+ u64 rate;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
+ struct device_node *opp_table_np, *np;
+ int ret;
table = kcalloc(LUT_MAX_ENTRIES + 1, sizeof(*table), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!table)
return -ENOMEM;
+ ret = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(cpu_dev);
+ if (!ret) {
+ /* Disable all opps and cross-validate against LUT */
+ opp_table_np = dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node(cpu_dev);
+ for_each_available_child_of_node(opp_table_np, np) {
+ ret = of_property_read_u64(np, "opp-hz", &rate);
+ if (!ret)
+ dev_pm_opp_disable(cpu_dev, rate);
+ }
+ of_node_put(opp_table_np);
+ } else if (ret != -ENODEV) {
+ dev_err(cpu_dev, "Invalid OPP table in Device tree\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < LUT_MAX_ENTRIES; i++) {
data = readl_relaxed(base + REG_FREQ_LUT +
i * LUT_ROW_SIZE);
@@ -112,7 +179,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
if (freq != prev_freq && core_count != LUT_TURBO_IND) {
table[i].frequency = freq;
- dev_pm_opp_add(cpu_dev, freq * 1000, volt);
+ qcom_cpufreq_update_opp(cpu_dev, freq, volt);
dev_dbg(cpu_dev, "index=%d freq=%d, core_count %d\n", i,
freq, core_count);
} else if (core_count == LUT_TURBO_IND) {
@@ -133,7 +200,8 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
if (prev->frequency == CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID) {
prev->frequency = prev_freq;
prev->flags = CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ;
- dev_pm_opp_add(cpu_dev, prev_freq * 1000, volt);
+ qcom_cpufreq_update_opp(cpu_dev, prev_freq,
+ volt);
}
break;
@@ -254,6 +322,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
void __iomem *base = policy->driver_data - REG_PERF_STATE;
dev_pm_opp_remove_all_dynamic(cpu_dev);
+ dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(policy->related_cpus);
kfree(policy->freq_table);
devm_iounmap(&global_pdev->dev, base);
@@ -301,6 +370,10 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
global_pdev = pdev;
+ ret = qcom_cpufreq_find_icc_paths(&pdev->dev);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&cpufreq_qcom_hw_driver);
if (ret)
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "CPUFreq HW driver failed to register\n");
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-27 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-27 20:21 [PATCH v5 0/5] DDR/L3 Scaling support on SDM845 and SC7180 SoCs Sibi Sankar
2020-05-27 20:21 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] cpufreq: blacklist SDM845 in cpufreq-dt-platdev Sibi Sankar
2020-05-27 20:21 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] cpufreq: blacklist SC7180 " Sibi Sankar
2020-05-27 20:21 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] OPP: Add and export helper to set bandwidth Sibi Sankar
2020-05-27 20:21 ` Sibi Sankar [this message]
2020-05-29 10:00 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] cpufreq: qcom: Update the bandwidth levels on frequency change Viresh Kumar
2020-05-29 11:30 ` Sibi Sankar
2020-06-01 11:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-06-02 6:57 ` Sibi Sankar
2020-05-27 20:21 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] cpufreq: qcom: Disable fast switch when scaling DDR/L3 Sibi Sankar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200527202153.11659-5-sibis@codeaurora.org \
--to=sibis@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=georgi.djakov@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=smasetty@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).