linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>,
	davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, bbhatt@codeaurora.org,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, jhugo@codeaurora.org,
	hemantk@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] bus: mhi: Add mhi_queue_is_full function
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 10:43:53 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201106051353.GA3473@work> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201105165708.31d24782@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>

On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 04:57:08PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue,  3 Nov 2020 18:23:53 +0100 Loic Poulain wrote:
> > This function can be used by client driver to determine whether it's
> > possible to queue new elements in a channel ring.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> 
> Applied.

Oops. I should've mentioned this (my bad) that we should use an immutable
branch to take this change. Because, there are changes going to get merged
into the MHI tree which will introduce merge conflicts. And moreover, we
planned to have an immutable branch to handle a similar case with ath11k.

Since you've applied now, what would you propose?

Thanks,
Mani

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-06  5:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-03 17:23 [PATCH v10 1/2] bus: mhi: Add mhi_queue_is_full function Loic Poulain
2020-11-03 17:23 ` [PATCH v10 2/2] net: Add mhi-net driver Loic Poulain
2020-11-06  0:57   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-06  0:57 ` [PATCH v10 1/2] bus: mhi: Add mhi_queue_is_full function Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-06  5:13   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2020-11-06 16:04     ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-06 16:28       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-11-06 16:39         ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-10 18:44           ` Kalle Valo
2020-12-29 20:15 ` patchwork-bot+linux-arm-msm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201106051353.GA3473@work \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=bbhatt@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hemantk@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).