On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:34:19PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > ====================================================== > WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected > 5.11.0-rc1-00008-geaa7995c529b #10095 Not tainted > ------------------------------------------------------ > swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock: > c12e1b80 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: > regulator_lock_dependent+0x4c/0x2b0 If you're sending backtraces or other enormous reports like this please run them through addr2line first so that things are a bit more leigible. > but task is already holding lock: > df7190c0 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: > regulator_resolve_supply+0x44/0x318 > > which lock already depends on the new lock. Does this help (completely untested): diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index 3ae5ccd9277d..7d1422b00974 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -1823,17 +1823,6 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev) if (rdev->supply) return 0; - /* - * Recheck rdev->supply with rdev->mutex lock held to avoid a race - * between rdev->supply null check and setting rdev->supply in - * set_supply() from concurrent tasks. - */ - regulator_lock(rdev); - - /* Supply just resolved by a concurrent task? */ - if (rdev->supply) - goto out; - r = regulator_dev_lookup(dev, rdev->supply_name); if (IS_ERR(r)) { ret = PTR_ERR(r); @@ -1885,10 +1874,23 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev) goto out; } + /* + * Recheck rdev->supply with rdev->mutex lock held to avoid a race + * between rdev->supply null check and setting rdev->supply in + * set_supply() from concurrent tasks. + */ + regulator_lock(rdev); + + /* Supply just resolved by a concurrent task? */ + if (rdev->supply) { + put_device(&r->dev); + goto out_rdev_lock; + } + ret = set_supply(rdev, r); if (ret < 0) { put_device(&r->dev); - goto out; + goto out_rdev_lock; } /* @@ -1901,12 +1903,13 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev) if (ret < 0) { _regulator_put(rdev->supply); rdev->supply = NULL; - goto out; + goto out_rdev_lock; } } -out: +out_rdev_lock: regulator_unlock(rdev); +out: return ret; }