From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
Cc: hemantk@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] mhi: pci_generic: No-Op for device_wake operations
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:17:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210304064736.GD3363@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1614615911-18794-4-git-send-email-loic.poulain@linaro.org>
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 05:25:09PM +0100, Loic Poulain wrote:
> The wake_db register presence is highly speculative and can fuze MHI
> devices. Indeed, currently the wake_db register address is defined at
> entry 127 of the 'Channel doorbell array', thus writing to this address
> is equivalent to ringing the doorbell for channel 127, causing trouble
> with some device that get an unexpected channel 127 doorbell interrupt.
>
what are those "some" devices?
> This change fixes that issue by setting wake get/put as no-op for
> pci_generic devices. The wake device sideband mechanism seems really
> specific to each device, and is AFAIK no defined by the MHI spec.
>
s/no/not
> It also removes zeroing initialization of wake_db register during MMIO
> initialization, the register being set via wake_get/put accessors few
> cycles later during M0 transition.
>
IIUC, the DEVICE_WAKE specified in the MHI spec corresponds to the wake doorbell
register. But in some cases, this rather happens to be a #WAKE sideband GPIO as
in PCIe.
> Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c | 2 --
> drivers/bus/mhi/pci_generic.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c
> index 2159dbc..32eb90f 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c
> @@ -510,8 +510,6 @@ int mhi_init_mmio(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl)
>
> /* Setup wake db */
> mhi_cntrl->wake_db = base + val + (8 * MHI_DEV_WAKE_DB);
> - mhi_write_reg(mhi_cntrl, mhi_cntrl->wake_db, 4, 0);
> - mhi_write_reg(mhi_cntrl, mhi_cntrl->wake_db, 0, 0);
I need comment from Hemant/Bhaumik on this change since I don't exactly know if
this is really required or not.
Thanks,
Mani
> mhi_cntrl->wake_set = false;
>
> /* Setup channel db address for each channel in tre_ring */
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/pci_generic.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/pci_generic.c
> index 87bab93..8423293 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/pci_generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/pci_generic.c
> @@ -312,6 +312,21 @@ static void mhi_pci_status_cb(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
> }
> }
>
> +static void mhi_pci_wake_get_nop(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl, bool force)
> +{
> + /* no-op */
> +}
> +
> +static void mhi_pci_wake_put_nop(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl, bool override)
> +{
> + /* no-op */
> +}
> +
> +static void mhi_pci_wake_toggle_nop(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl)
> +{
> + /* no-op */
> +}
> +
> static bool mhi_pci_is_alive(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl)
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(mhi_cntrl->cntrl_dev);
> @@ -515,6 +530,9 @@ static int mhi_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> mhi_cntrl->status_cb = mhi_pci_status_cb;
> mhi_cntrl->runtime_get = mhi_pci_runtime_get;
> mhi_cntrl->runtime_put = mhi_pci_runtime_put;
> + mhi_cntrl->wake_get = mhi_pci_wake_get_nop;
> + mhi_cntrl->wake_put = mhi_pci_wake_put_nop;
> + mhi_cntrl->wake_toggle = mhi_pci_wake_toggle_nop;
>
> err = mhi_pci_claim(mhi_cntrl, info->bar_num, DMA_BIT_MASK(info->dma_data_width));
> if (err)
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-04 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-01 16:25 [PATCH 1/6] mhi: pci_generic: Parametrable element count for events Loic Poulain
2021-03-01 16:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] mhi: pci_generic: Introduce quectel EM1XXGR-L support Loic Poulain
2021-03-04 6:32 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-01 16:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] mhi: pci_generic: Add SDX24 based modem support Loic Poulain
2021-03-04 6:32 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-01 16:25 ` [PATCH 4/6] mhi: pci_generic: No-Op for device_wake operations Loic Poulain
2021-03-04 6:47 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2021-03-04 8:34 ` Loic Poulain
2021-03-01 16:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] mhi: pci_generic: Use generic PCI power management Loic Poulain
2021-03-04 6:56 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-04 8:23 ` Loic Poulain
2021-03-01 16:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] mhi: pci_generic: Add support for runtime PM Loic Poulain
2021-03-04 6:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] mhi: pci_generic: Parametrable element count for events Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210304064736.GD3363@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=hemantk@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).