Re: [PATCH 6/6] firmware: qcom_scm: Only compile legacy calls on ARM

[Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>]

On Tue 23 Mar 13:27 CDT 2021, Elliot Berman wrote:

> On 3/22/2021 8:36 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-03-07 09:42:45)
> > > On Sat 06 Mar 00:18 CST 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Quoting Elliot Berman (2021-03-05 10:18:09)
> > > > > On 3/3/2021 10:14 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > > > > Quoting Elliot Berman (2021-03-03 19:35:08)
> > > > > 
> > > > >   > +    desc.args[0] = flags;
> > > > >   > +    desc.args[1] = virt_to_phys(entry);
> > > > >   > +
> > > > >   > +    return scm_legacy_call_atomic(NULL, &desc, NULL);
> > > > >   > +}
> > > > >   > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_set_cold_boot_addr);
> > > > > 
> > > > > This should still be qcom_scm_call.
> > > > 
> > > > You mean s/scm_legacy_call_atomic/qcom_scm_call/ right?
> > > > 
> > > > I don't really want to resend the rest of the patches if this last one
> > > > is the only one that needs an update. This was a semi-RFC anyway so
> > > > maybe it's fine if the first 5 patches get merged and then I can resend
> > > > this one? Otherwise I will resend this again next week or so with less
> > > > diff for this patch.
> > > 
> > > I'm fine with merging the first 5, but was hoping that Elliot could
> > > provide either a "Reviewed-by" or at least an "Acked-by" on these.
> > > 
> > 
> > I'll take the silence as I should resend the whole series?
> > 
> 
> I thought Bjorn was accepting the first 5 already, my apologies.
> 
> Patches 1-5:
> Acked-by: Elliot Berman <eberman@codeaurora.org>

Thanks Elliot. I'll pick up the first 5, so please skip these in your
repost, Stephen.

Regards,
Bjorn