linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: hemantk@codeaurora.org, bbhatt@codeaurora.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] bus: mhi: core: Sanity check values from remote device before use
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 13:51:50 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210407082150.GP8675@work> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1615411855-15053-1-git-send-email-jhugo@codeaurora.org>

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:30:55PM -0700, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> When parsing the structures in the shared memory, there are values which
> come from the remote device.  For example, a transfer completion event
> will have a pointer to the tre in the relevant channel's transfer ring.
> As another example, event ring elements may specify a channel in which
> the event occurred, however the specified channel value may not be valid
> as no channel is defined at that index even though the index may be less
> than the maximum allowed index.  Such values should be considered to be
> untrusted, and validated before use.  If we blindly use such values, we
> may access invalid data or crash if the values are corrupted.
> 
> If validation fails, drop the relevant event.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>

Looks good to me, but I need an ACK from Hemant/Bhaumik.

Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>

Thanks,
Mani

> ---
> 
> v3: Add the channel validation example to commit text
> v2: Fix subject
> 
>  drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> index a7811fb..6c0e05d 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> @@ -242,6 +242,11 @@ static void mhi_del_ring_element(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  	smp_wmb();
>  }
>  
> +static bool is_valid_ring_ptr(struct mhi_ring *ring, dma_addr_t addr)
> +{
> +	return addr >= ring->iommu_base && addr < ring->iommu_base + ring->len;
> +}
> +
>  int mhi_destroy_device(struct device *dev, void *data)
>  {
>  	struct mhi_chan *ul_chan, *dl_chan;
> @@ -404,7 +409,16 @@ irqreturn_t mhi_irq_handler(int irq_number, void *dev)
>  	struct mhi_event_ctxt *er_ctxt =
>  		&mhi_cntrl->mhi_ctxt->er_ctxt[mhi_event->er_index];
>  	struct mhi_ring *ev_ring = &mhi_event->ring;
> -	void *dev_rp = mhi_to_virtual(ev_ring, er_ctxt->rp);
> +	dma_addr_t ptr = er_ctxt->rp;
> +	void *dev_rp;
> +
> +	if (!is_valid_ring_ptr(ev_ring, ptr)) {
> +		dev_err(&mhi_cntrl->mhi_dev->dev,
> +			"Event ring rp points outside of the event ring\n");
> +		return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_rp = mhi_to_virtual(ev_ring, ptr);
>  
>  	/* Only proceed if event ring has pending events */
>  	if (ev_ring->rp == dev_rp)
> @@ -560,6 +574,11 @@ static int parse_xfer_event(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  		struct mhi_buf_info *buf_info;
>  		u16 xfer_len;
>  
> +		if (!is_valid_ring_ptr(tre_ring, ptr)) {
> +			dev_err(&mhi_cntrl->mhi_dev->dev,
> +				"Event element points outside of the tre ring\n");
> +			break;
> +		}
>  		/* Get the TRB this event points to */
>  		ev_tre = mhi_to_virtual(tre_ring, ptr);
>  
> @@ -719,6 +738,12 @@ static void mhi_process_cmd_completion(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  	struct mhi_chan *mhi_chan;
>  	u32 chan;
>  
> +	if (!is_valid_ring_ptr(mhi_ring, ptr)) {
> +		dev_err(&mhi_cntrl->mhi_dev->dev,
> +			"Event element points outside of the cmd ring\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	cmd_pkt = mhi_to_virtual(mhi_ring, ptr);
>  
>  	chan = MHI_TRE_GET_CMD_CHID(cmd_pkt);
> @@ -743,6 +768,7 @@ int mhi_process_ctrl_ev_ring(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  	struct device *dev = &mhi_cntrl->mhi_dev->dev;
>  	u32 chan;
>  	int count = 0;
> +	dma_addr_t ptr = er_ctxt->rp;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * This is a quick check to avoid unnecessary event processing
> @@ -752,7 +778,13 @@ int mhi_process_ctrl_ev_ring(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  	if (unlikely(MHI_EVENT_ACCESS_INVALID(mhi_cntrl->pm_state)))
>  		return -EIO;
>  
> -	dev_rp = mhi_to_virtual(ev_ring, er_ctxt->rp);
> +	if (!is_valid_ring_ptr(ev_ring, ptr)) {
> +		dev_err(&mhi_cntrl->mhi_dev->dev,
> +			"Event ring rp points outside of the event ring\n");
> +		return -EIO;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_rp = mhi_to_virtual(ev_ring, ptr);
>  	local_rp = ev_ring->rp;
>  
>  	while (dev_rp != local_rp) {
> @@ -858,6 +890,8 @@ int mhi_process_ctrl_ev_ring(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  			 */
>  			if (chan < mhi_cntrl->max_chan) {
>  				mhi_chan = &mhi_cntrl->mhi_chan[chan];
> +				if (!mhi_chan->configured)
> +					break;
>  				parse_xfer_event(mhi_cntrl, local_rp, mhi_chan);
>  				event_quota--;
>  			}
> @@ -869,7 +903,15 @@ int mhi_process_ctrl_ev_ring(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  
>  		mhi_recycle_ev_ring_element(mhi_cntrl, ev_ring);
>  		local_rp = ev_ring->rp;
> -		dev_rp = mhi_to_virtual(ev_ring, er_ctxt->rp);
> +
> +		ptr = er_ctxt->rp;
> +		if (!is_valid_ring_ptr(ev_ring, ptr)) {
> +			dev_err(&mhi_cntrl->mhi_dev->dev,
> +				"Event ring rp points outside of the event ring\n");
> +			return -EIO;
> +		}
> +
> +		dev_rp = mhi_to_virtual(ev_ring, ptr);
>  		count++;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -892,11 +934,18 @@ int mhi_process_data_event_ring(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  	int count = 0;
>  	u32 chan;
>  	struct mhi_chan *mhi_chan;
> +	dma_addr_t ptr = er_ctxt->rp;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(MHI_EVENT_ACCESS_INVALID(mhi_cntrl->pm_state)))
>  		return -EIO;
>  
> -	dev_rp = mhi_to_virtual(ev_ring, er_ctxt->rp);
> +	if (!is_valid_ring_ptr(ev_ring, ptr)) {
> +		dev_err(&mhi_cntrl->mhi_dev->dev,
> +			"Event ring rp points outside of the event ring\n");
> +		return -EIO;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_rp = mhi_to_virtual(ev_ring, ptr);
>  	local_rp = ev_ring->rp;
>  
>  	while (dev_rp != local_rp && event_quota > 0) {
> @@ -910,7 +959,8 @@ int mhi_process_data_event_ring(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  		 * Only process the event ring elements whose channel
>  		 * ID is within the maximum supported range.
>  		 */
> -		if (chan < mhi_cntrl->max_chan) {
> +		if (chan < mhi_cntrl->max_chan &&
> +		    mhi_cntrl->mhi_chan[chan].configured) {
>  			mhi_chan = &mhi_cntrl->mhi_chan[chan];
>  
>  			if (likely(type == MHI_PKT_TYPE_TX_EVENT)) {
> @@ -924,7 +974,15 @@ int mhi_process_data_event_ring(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  
>  		mhi_recycle_ev_ring_element(mhi_cntrl, ev_ring);
>  		local_rp = ev_ring->rp;
> -		dev_rp = mhi_to_virtual(ev_ring, er_ctxt->rp);
> +
> +		ptr = er_ctxt->rp;
> +		if (!is_valid_ring_ptr(ev_ring, ptr)) {
> +			dev_err(&mhi_cntrl->mhi_dev->dev,
> +				"Event ring rp points outside of the event ring\n");
> +			return -EIO;
> +		}
> +
> +		dev_rp = mhi_to_virtual(ev_ring, ptr);
>  		count++;
>  	}
>  	read_lock_bh(&mhi_cntrl->pm_lock);
> @@ -1385,6 +1443,7 @@ static void mhi_mark_stale_events(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  	struct mhi_ring *ev_ring;
>  	struct device *dev = &mhi_cntrl->mhi_dev->dev;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> +	dma_addr_t ptr;
>  
>  	dev_dbg(dev, "Marking all events for chan: %d as stale\n", chan);
>  
> @@ -1392,7 +1451,15 @@ static void mhi_mark_stale_events(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  
>  	/* mark all stale events related to channel as STALE event */
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&mhi_event->lock, flags);
> -	dev_rp = mhi_to_virtual(ev_ring, er_ctxt->rp);
> +
> +	ptr = er_ctxt->rp;
> +	if (!is_valid_ring_ptr(ev_ring, ptr)) {
> +		dev_err(&mhi_cntrl->mhi_dev->dev,
> +			"Event ring rp points outside of the event ring\n");
> +		dev_rp = ev_ring->rp;
> +	} else {
> +		dev_rp = mhi_to_virtual(ev_ring, ptr);
> +	}
>  
>  	local_rp = ev_ring->rp;
>  	while (dev_rp != local_rp) {
> -- 
> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
> Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-07  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-10 21:30 [PATCH v3] bus: mhi: core: Sanity check values from remote device before use Jeffrey Hugo
2021-04-07  8:21 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2021-04-07 21:30 ` Hemant Kumar
2021-04-08  6:57 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-05-26 19:03 ` patchwork-bot+linux-arm-msm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210407082150.GP8675@work \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=bbhatt@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hemantk@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).