linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org>
Cc: hemantk@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mhi: add MHI_STATE_M2 to resume success criteria
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 18:15:30 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210521124530.GF70095@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210420035339.282963-1-bqiang@codeaurora.org>

Hi,

The patch subject should be,

"bus: mhi: Wait for M2 state during system resume"

We follow "bus: mhi:" prefix for all MHI patches. Also, the subject should
clearly portray what the patch is intend to do.

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:53:39AM +0800, Baochen Qiang wrote:
> During system resume, mhi driver triggers M3->M0 transition and then waits

s/mhi driver/MHI host

> for target device to enter M0 state. Once done, the device queues a state
> change event into ctrl event ring and notify mhi dirver by raising an

s/notify/notifies and s/mhi dirver/MHI host. MHI driver is somewhat confusing
since we have the MHI device driver (QRTR etc...) as well. So just use MHI host
everywhere.

> interrupt, where a tasklet is scheduled to process this event. In most cases,
> the taklet is served timely and wait operation succeeds.
> 

s/taklet/tasklet

> However, there are cases where CPU is busy and can not serve this tasklet

a/can not/cannot

> for some time. Once delay goes long enough, the device moves itself to M1
> state and also interrupts mhi driver after inserting a new state change
> event to ctrl ring. Later CPU finally has time to process the ring, however
> there are two events in it now:
> 	1. for M3->M0 event, which is processed first as queued first,
> 	   tasklet handler updates device state to M0 and wakes up the task,
> 	   i.e., the mhi driver.
> 	2. for M0->M1 event, which is processed later, tasklet handler
> 	   triggers M1->M2 transition and updates device state to M2 directly,
> 	   then wakes up the mhi driver(if still sleeping on this wait queue).
> Note that although mhi driver has been woken up while processing the first
> event, it may still has no chance to run before the second event is processed.
> In other words, mhi driver has to keep waiting till timeout cause the M0 state
> has been missed.
> 
> kernel log here:
> ...
> Apr 15 01:45:14 test-NUC8i7HVK kernel: [ 4247.911251] mhi 0000:06:00.0: Entered with PM state: M3, MHI state: M3
> Apr 15 01:45:14 test-NUC8i7HVK kernel: [ 4247.917762] mhi 0000:06:00.0: State change event to state: M0
> Apr 15 01:45:14 test-NUC8i7HVK kernel: [ 4247.917767] mhi 0000:06:00.0: State change event to state: M1
> Apr 15 01:45:14 test-NUC8i7HVK kernel: [ 4338.788231] mhi 0000:06:00.0: Did not enter M0 state, MHI state: M2, PM state: M2
> ...
> 
> Fix this issue by simply adding M2 as a valid state for resume.
> 
> Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-01720.1-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-1
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org>

Could you please add a fixes tag as well? And this patch should be backported to
stable kernels also, so please CC stable@vger.kernel.org.

Thanks,
Mani

> ---
>  drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
> index ce73cfa63cb3..ca5f2feed9d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
> @@ -900,6 +900,7 @@ int mhi_pm_resume(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl)
>  
>  	ret = wait_event_timeout(mhi_cntrl->state_event,
>  				 mhi_cntrl->dev_state == MHI_STATE_M0 ||
> +				 mhi_cntrl->dev_state == MHI_STATE_M2 ||
>  				 MHI_PM_IN_ERROR_STATE(mhi_cntrl->pm_state),
>  				 msecs_to_jiffies(mhi_cntrl->timeout_ms));
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-21 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-20  3:53 Baochen Qiang
2021-05-03 23:55 ` Hemant Kumar
2021-05-21 12:45 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2021-05-24  3:14   ` bqiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210521124530.GF70095@thinkpad \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=bqiang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hemantk@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] mhi: add MHI_STATE_M2 to resume success criteria' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).