From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org>
Cc: hemantk@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bus: mhi: Wait for M2 state during system resume
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 09:45:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210524041514.GA8823@work> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210524040312.14409-1-bqiang@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 12:03:12PM +0800, Baochen Qiang wrote:
> During system resume, MHI host triggers M3->M0 transition and then waits
> for target device to enter M0 state. Once done, the device queues a state
> change event into ctrl event ring and notifies MHI host by raising an
> interrupt, where a tasklet is scheduled to process this event. In most cases,
> the tasklet is served timely and wait operation succeeds.
>
> However, there are cases where CPU is busy and cannot serve this tasklet
> for some time. Once delay goes long enough, the device moves itself to M1
> state and also interrupts MHI host after inserting a new state change
> event to ctrl ring. Later CPU finally has time to process the ring, however
> there are two events in it now:
> 1. for M3->M0 event, which is processed first as queued first,
> tasklet handler updates device state to M0 and wakes up the task,
> i.e., the MHI host.
> 2. for M0->M1 event, which is processed later, tasklet handler
> triggers M1->M2 transition and updates device state to M2 directly,
> then wakes up the MHI host(if still sleeping on this wait queue).
> Note that although MHI host has been woken up while processing the first
> event, it may still has no chance to run before the second event is processed.
> In other words, MHI host has to keep waiting till timeout cause the M0 state
> has been missed.
>
> kernel log here:
> ...
> Apr 15 01:45:14 test-NUC8i7HVK kernel: [ 4247.911251] mhi 0000:06:00.0: Entered with PM state: M3, MHI state: M3
> Apr 15 01:45:14 test-NUC8i7HVK kernel: [ 4247.917762] mhi 0000:06:00.0: State change event to state: M0
> Apr 15 01:45:14 test-NUC8i7HVK kernel: [ 4247.917767] mhi 0000:06:00.0: State change event to state: M1
> Apr 15 01:45:14 test-NUC8i7HVK kernel: [ 4338.788231] mhi 0000:06:00.0: Did not enter M0 state, MHI state: M2, PM state: M2
> ...
>
> Fix this issue by simply adding M2 as a valid state for resume.
>
> Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-01720.1-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-1
>
> Fixes: 0c6b20a1d720 ("bus: mhi: core: Add support for MHI suspend and resume")
> Signed-off-by: Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Hemant Kumar <hemantk@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Thanks,
Mani
> ---
> drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
> index e2e59a341fef..59b009a3ee9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
> @@ -934,6 +934,7 @@ int mhi_pm_resume(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl)
>
> ret = wait_event_timeout(mhi_cntrl->state_event,
> mhi_cntrl->dev_state == MHI_STATE_M0 ||
> + mhi_cntrl->dev_state == MHI_STATE_M2 ||
> MHI_PM_IN_ERROR_STATE(mhi_cntrl->pm_state),
> msecs_to_jiffies(mhi_cntrl->timeout_ms));
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-24 4:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-24 4:03 [PATCH v2] bus: mhi: Wait for M2 state during system resume Baochen Qiang
2021-05-24 4:15 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2021-05-24 4:37 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-05-24 4:58 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-05-24 7:01 ` Greg KH
2021-05-24 8:43 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-07-20 2:30 ` patchwork-bot+linux-arm-msm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210524041514.GA8823@work \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=bqiang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hemantk@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).