From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D58FC47082 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 10:58:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25762613B4 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 10:58:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230197AbhFELAU (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jun 2021 07:00:20 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-f45.google.com ([209.85.218.45]:45996 "EHLO mail-ej1-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230128AbhFELAT (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jun 2021 07:00:19 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-f45.google.com with SMTP id k7so18346825ejv.12 for ; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 03:58:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=snejp.pl; s=gmail; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=zAatdENmuWE02Wtsxbg8mDmM1A4UzbS0ayK3fAB0kuU=; b=QRzUFfvktn6832GH3Cgb1IZd4jkQ3iW3CBqqsfsYp5wj+KAP5/ZWcsgc1EsZ9v3MOE YBuCId8GG9V566GoRbK+L8casmhcrIO3g2fXcCF4m7UKGL2mVRWHoA7lXV395TMmAnB9 trtOXqRTQBssi74ghwYsn8tqsePeyVyrYBVvAS0LyHxKZxmKYT8ifG67hIKNuOkB4HcW R3pTZp0qbgdQgjHI3cOcwq7FPDgz/khDq4MbPqxhsu3dZqePos6vzpfIRI//D2CdVuoZ FdMOr+O9yhKG3p3z9SXHi1bMDdPv0c4WhGOKe1jG46MXTjjsDSOSzm62uXG5AAeIUYeH 2SdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=zAatdENmuWE02Wtsxbg8mDmM1A4UzbS0ayK3fAB0kuU=; b=lF0G9mgh+RTLWzTItsgXQmrq4IHX8X+mckx7nJ0vwu3hSijS2cPdnRKAyxxaT6sPSi BhpqRDi9WYZ7bU/yVceaqweiakiBv2gkUR6hTpqlEJPWpAjDZgUppArdPlssOV9JFkcc VQUO6N9Za9QpMwm6AThTVTpMTstkvGqy0hQYd1DhLRdnSSFoi8w+xIzlzaiqmPgjz/o6 0bLJ/MZNnQ6XlW/kejE+qUcMFlrYlkZzJvWtBLMeNrnkrH+nmgoBBXIpJWvI6Wo+H1IH 3UHUATueRwLkaO22iKN6spiQ7BhWCsP3JwwKOXhsMtRKbttO1NZKlgHEJz2uNVYUGt8h rrSg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533k6ED7pmp7JqcD8LS/wknVSlxtP8Stw1Ou+oXHSEFxF7MAwh+F XnhClzI9IzlSeRGWGDii7YEZ2A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz6UJTClZacEqO4c79WzEZSxkEyGAYFFnKB76Jha8aR7zWTqaip6ExYHD2hO5EdgFxK8jAdcg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:174e:: with SMTP id d14mr8679223eje.397.1622890637819; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 03:57:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from PackardBell (192038129059.mbb.telenor.dk. [192.38.129.59]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z19sm3824023edr.77.2021.06.05.03.57.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 05 Jun 2021 03:57:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (PackardBell [local]) by PackardBell (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 1555d0a1; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 10:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 12:57:14 +0200 From: Bartosz Dudziak To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Kathiravan T , Michael Turquette , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Add support for MSM8226 RPM clocks Message-ID: <20210605105714.GA13168@PackardBell> References: <20210502122027.9351-1-bartosz.dudziak@snejp.pl> <20210502122027.9351-5-bartosz.dudziak@snejp.pl> <162261964337.4130789.14816345669886604238@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <162261964337.4130789.14816345669886604238@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 12:40:43AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Bartosz Dudziak (2021-05-02 05:20:27) > > Add rmp smd clocks, PMIC and bus clocks which are required on MSM8226 > > for clients to vote on. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Dudziak > > --- > > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c > > index 0e1dfa8948..bf73942e86 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c > > @@ -406,6 +406,79 @@ static const struct clk_ops clk_smd_rpm_branch_ops = { > > .unprepare = clk_smd_rpm_unprepare, > > }; > > > > +/* msm8226 */ > > This doesn't apply anymore. Can you resend just this one patch please? > And base it on clk-next which I will push out shortly. Ideally a bunch > of clks can be reused instead of redefined. > > > +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8226, pnoc_clk, pnoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 0); > > +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8226, snoc_clk, snoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 1); I have send v2 of this one patch. I have reused the clocks from MSM8974 because after the change my code happened to be the exacly same as msm8974_clks struct.