linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, hemantk@codeaurora.org,
	jhugo@codeaurora.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	loic.poulain@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bus: mhi: core: Add support for processing priority of event ring
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 13:18:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210619074836.GD4889@workstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624053903-24653-2-git-send-email-bbhatt@codeaurora.org>

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 03:05:03PM -0700, Bhaumik Bhatt wrote:
> From: Hemant Kumar <hemantk@codeaurora.org>
> 
> Event ring priorities are currently set to 1 and are unused.
> Default processing priority for event rings is set to regular
> tasklet. Controllers can choose to use high priority tasklet
> scheduling for certain event rings critical for processing such
> as ones transporting control information if they wish to avoid
> system scheduling delays for those packets. In order to support
> these use cases, allow controllers to set event ring priority to
> high.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Kumar <hemantk@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@codeaurora.org>

Applied to mhi-next!

Thanks,
Mani

> ---
>  drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c | 3 +--
>  drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c | 9 +++++++--
>  include/linux/mhi.h         | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c
> index c81b377..4446760 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c
> @@ -673,8 +673,7 @@ static int parse_ev_cfg(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  				&mhi_cntrl->mhi_chan[mhi_event->chan];
>  		}
>  
> -		/* Priority is fixed to 1 for now */
> -		mhi_event->priority = 1;
> +		mhi_event->priority = event_cfg->priority;
>  
>  		mhi_event->db_cfg.brstmode = event_cfg->mode;
>  		if (MHI_INVALID_BRSTMODE(mhi_event->db_cfg.brstmode))
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> index 8ac73f9..3775c77 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> @@ -454,10 +454,15 @@ irqreturn_t mhi_irq_handler(int irq_number, void *dev)
>  
>  		if (mhi_dev)
>  			mhi_notify(mhi_dev, MHI_CB_PENDING_DATA);
> -	} else {
> -		tasklet_schedule(&mhi_event->task);
> +
> +		return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!mhi_event->priority)
> +		tasklet_hi_schedule(&mhi_event->task);
> +	else
> +		tasklet_schedule(&mhi_event->task);
> +
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/mhi.h b/include/linux/mhi.h
> index 86cea52..bf23c21 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mhi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mhi.h
> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ struct mhi_channel_config {
>   * @irq_moderation_ms: Delay irq for additional events to be aggregated
>   * @irq: IRQ associated with this ring
>   * @channel: Dedicated channel number. U32_MAX indicates a non-dedicated ring
> - * @priority: Priority of this ring. Use 1 for now
> + * @priority: Processing priority of this ring. 0 is high and 1 is regular
>   * @mode: Doorbell mode
>   * @data_type: Type of data this ring will process
>   * @hardware_event: This ring is associated with hardware channels
> -- 
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-19  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-18 22:05 [PATCH v2] MHI event ring priority updates Bhaumik Bhatt
2021-06-18 22:05 ` [PATCH v2] bus: mhi: core: Add support for processing priority of event ring Bhaumik Bhatt
2021-06-19  4:29   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-19  7:48   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210619074836.GD4889@workstation \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=bbhatt@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hemantk@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).