From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119A5C4320A for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 04:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA9260F58 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 04:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231846AbhHEEFw (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 00:05:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41188 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229446AbhHEEFv (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 00:05:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C29BC061765 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 21:05:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id ca5so6115669pjb.5 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 21:05:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/tmrG3FNtvqmHMxfNd/70AdCn3lth7qM0+cOOLSMGRw=; b=n9nKcnvu1TGK246QsMUW5hEHiQdw7jid0rI8Ai2n3Q6YF5HO71e8vyOF8h6RRBOfKp Ax1Mus2CrSKnM70CTTAG2iYZE1GCkJBZjBqmeq6SAyntruRPoNCDGMxodU3FNzPQPf5R 5SmvUXPxtI1QPlsqolZ+h1Gu4GhBSjY2n5ZjpM+4pxQImBejAQJStgy8wouoKSm8IX89 01L64ptvJvD09cyynbbPhFnLj5wjHR69d/H104GfUVCxGWzls6yO0ZkX5+uenUeXlSO7 0tEvspnNsLl0uYGT3pMty6INrvcrix/th2DVXWOAnq5VOTmTzeLZNJzv0lotVDyUQQ23 JgCA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/tmrG3FNtvqmHMxfNd/70AdCn3lth7qM0+cOOLSMGRw=; b=thFD/bcazLo+o4lMYE9NPVyrDJyzicqHDeOct+m6TqdCU0QcvWgBgQ46qzk7j3+Vdf gUJZHgeI11UAwsVWpGw+JNgt/X4jzIVP8Q+mPgCXYiqYo3Dc/r6tI3Leg+zU0tv+2XyT m85FELVyNq+wpXfN97CeqESx+mXenqLGjjHV4df3rBrIqQx6O8ESj248/mIAEDuGCE09 mRwpJWU3HDWnnbFajOdHizw6Qa8Q0/LWKJ/sPnkcUWgeRSkqZItOjAHosJCAwqHZVyxL ymjBHBJ0SXIUdQnuMOgzDrszFlqVzAQrZbxHxBR1pl3i3uEQY/wXd0DBD/aMEXnY4x+X Gc9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531+vCG2oR4+IdKcdWBPNw+dgFD0947t8QxsAb1f+s93e7j6KEV+ sCYE2YwmTSl0XJya/9gnFTszKg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz3BjNgAWw0KM1IUvz+qiNMzaEqBaeVS0JDBOjG/zw/L3WF9l+vFaGNLvHO3cCPmwhNKoQKDg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2ec6:: with SMTP id h6mr12940123pjs.9.1628136337051; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 21:05:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([122.172.201.85]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w186sm4779223pfw.106.2021.08.04.21.05.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 21:05:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 09:35:34 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Ulf Hansson Cc: Rajendra Nayak , Bjorn Andersson , Linux PM , DTML , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-msm , Stephen Boyd , Roja Rani Yarubandi , Stephan Gerhold Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] PM / Domains: Add support for 'required-opps' to set default perf state Message-ID: <20210805040534.bmscqfjb6etywmu3@vireshk-i7> References: <1626764876-10229-1-git-send-email-rnayak@codeaurora.org> <1626764876-10229-2-git-send-email-rnayak@codeaurora.org> <35950d34-5cab-1b09-9864-49217a83f68d@codeaurora.org> <6fe7d326-1822-5a49-cca7-df9a2739dca8@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 04-08-21, 13:39, Ulf Hansson wrote: > Viresh, would it make sense to remove that print? I mean, the > required-opps property could be considered as optional and it seems a > bit silly that a pre-parsing of the property is needed to figure that > out. Sure, np. -- viresh