From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="muls9Ixx" Received: from mail-pf1-x42f.google.com (mail-pf1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8A7D114 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:09:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6ceb2501f1bso6780818b3a.0 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:09:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1702530590; x=1703135390; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HRQN/5Gl+E+Y/YwiwR7f4dgjP1vz1MfNF5W9YJDw5ro=; b=muls9IxxcvhgabpJnsNRrjQqVmbLHeRx9Z19ijPtLKdd6DTHqLeN9szmdTQFEwpc2o XvWXG/Ug7BQ5NCowzMWQXhdGAqdRSQ36nmPSem1r+rFZ6QjmZjkKoTjzblD+7jb/p5uC uRil78WewuDF5wHA3/X+olXRHjfQLDe676duAZpmEtBMxC+uigAe0ZAJn4KR78fAvoNQ C7Cf4W7AyFuHOJNjS08euBGaoDXQ4HOkNnYB0mxGQPk+NLfLDFxl9rOPAIQ1BCdCqr3c SWA2IVRpgQ3eAtZJ0YE+qYtkrdo430yg5lzdw6mGQGnoXhTAI9aCXdi9xelC674BykLY TMtg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1702530590; x=1703135390; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HRQN/5Gl+E+Y/YwiwR7f4dgjP1vz1MfNF5W9YJDw5ro=; b=WbGk9X1NgKixpoMyovUopfnuLq9F2cC64pzq9ZVIAHKL3ZTr9FzHvqqz/OGJJJaLQp f0LIzc3XK4QIhdMgoXnGrHFXajh1DDFoR+21gAOxPhseQsWwRzFso7V0GFqlrAGxDc0r oZol/9Kksm/N/pjpcjDvp1aEuq8A2arraBSeVypcAJxJPALI118DFcf0Fvg494JtXMEJ 60ykKWsiMsFO0ZJUYWnbP6goO/aFs9lJ4BkagLQuOLU6Ap8gj3ZvlhLo2pBZbzqW1c2l IBN2wolBejVdpBE54+CC7IufU+6JRoJQ7Q8KJ5NZNR8Mg3zJ5jljs0xed8j3TcVlMAx7 Sxjg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzog/RiV7Uf+p1lEP/eBb5fGJAkhNnrpYueT+mhMaKSyWN1fFLH HsGPlkjYJFkScu5awwUUIhX3sLCWBkcBeGadYg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFoiD3gBR12SGaJPAivjdmpPvziAoacTLgEk0cWcQakHmt7CoNZ8PQ69964IUM6048brgNieg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:1604:b0:190:3b35:5999 with SMTP id l4-20020a056a20160400b001903b355999mr12233369pzj.9.1702530590210; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:09:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from thinkpad ([117.213.102.12]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z17-20020a17090ab11100b0028a69db1f51sm7950911pjq.30.2023.12.13.21.09.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:09:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 10:39:43 +0530 From: Manivannan Sadhasivam To: Konrad Dybcio Cc: martin.petersen@oracle.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, andersson@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quic_cang@quicinc.com, ahalaney@redhat.com, quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] scsi: ufs: qcom: Code cleanups Message-ID: <20231214050943.GC2938@thinkpad> References: <20231208065902.11006-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 06:42:31PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 8.12.2023 07:58, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This series has code some cleanups to the Qcom UFS driver. No functional > > change. In this version, I've removed code supporting legacy controllers > > ver < 2.0, as the respective platforms were never supported in upstream. > > > > Tested on: RB5 development board based on Qcom SM8250 SoC. > > > > - Mani > > > > Changes in v2: > > > > * Collected review tags > > * Fixed the comments from Andrew > > * Added a few more patches, most notably one removing the code for old > > controllers (ver < v2.0) > FWIW i found this snipped from a downstream commit from 2014: > > 8084 : 1.1.1 > 8994v1 : 1.2.0 > 8994v2 : 1.3.0 > > I'm yet to see any 8994 production device utilizing UFS (it wasn't > very good or affordable in 2014/15 IIRC), so I think it's gtg. > Thanks for digging! I was told that SoCs based on UFS 1.x controllers were not widely used in production, though I don't know why. - Mani > Konrad -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்