linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
To: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>, vkoul@kernel.org
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom-bam: fix circular buffer handling
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:50:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <31574ef2-d675-bb36-08d1-18b756ebd29e@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a50066ac-be85-6706-e7f3-f1069fd0dd0b@codeaurora.org>



On 18/06/2019 17:27, Sricharan R wrote:
>   The Macro's expect that buffer size is power of 2. So we are infact passing the actual correct
>   size ( MAX_DESCRIPTORS + 1 = 4096)
This will make the circular buffer macros happy but question is that do 
we actually have that many descriptor buffers?

This is what is in the driver:

#define BAM_DESC_FIFO_SIZE	SZ_32K
#define MAX_DESCRIPTORS (BAM_DESC_FIFO_SIZE / sizeof(struct bam_desc_hw) 
- 1)
#define BAM_FIFO_SIZE	(SZ_32K - 8)

Wouldn't having MAX_DESCRIPTORS + 1 = 4096  lead to overflow the actual 
descriptor memory size of (SZ_32K - 8) ?

--srini


  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-18 16:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-14 14:20 [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom-bam: fix circular buffer handling Srinivas Kandagatla
2019-06-14 19:43 ` Andy Gross
2019-06-18  4:53 ` Vinod Koul
2019-06-18  7:13 ` Sricharan R
2019-06-18 14:49   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2019-06-18 14:50   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2019-06-18 14:56     ` Sricharan R
2019-06-18 15:12       ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2019-06-18 16:27         ` Sricharan R
2019-06-18 16:50           ` Srinivas Kandagatla [this message]
2019-06-19 17:50             ` Sricharan R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=31574ef2-d675-bb36-08d1-18b756ebd29e@linaro.org \
    --to=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).