From: Bhaumik Bhatt <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: Kalle Valo <email@example.com> Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] ath11k: set register access length for MHI driver Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 10:49:51 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <email@example.com> Hi Kalle, On 2021-06-14 09:02 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Manivannan Sadhasivam <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: > >> On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 12:51:43PM -0700, Bhaumik Bhatt wrote: >>> MHI driver requires register space length to add range checks and >>> prevent memory region accesses outside of that for MMIO space. >>> Set it before registering the MHI controller. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bhaumik Bhatt <email@example.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Hemant Kumar <firstname.lastname@example.org> >> >> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <email@example.com> >> >> Kalle, should we do immutable branch for this patch or I can pick it >> up via MHI >> tree (if there are no other patches expected from ath11k for this >> controller)? > > I'm not expecting any conflicts with this, and if there are, they > should > be easy for Stephen or Linus to fix. So it's easiest to route this via > your tree. But I'm not giving my ack yet, see below. > > I'm worried that this patchset breaks bisect. Every patch in the > patchset should not break existing functionality, what if only patches > 1-3 are included in the tree but not patch 4? Wouldn't ath11k be broken > then? I didn't review the whole patchset, but I suspect the fix is to > include the ath11k change in the actual mhi patch which changes the > functionality. So that way we would not have a separate ath11k patch at > all. > > Also I'm not able to test this patchset at the moment. Can someone else > help and do a quick test with QCA6390 to verify these doesn't break > ath11k? I have requested someone to try and test this patch series with QCA6390. I or the testers will get back to you with the test results when they are available. As far as your concerns go, you can choose to pick patches 1-3 and that would be just fine. Things will break if patchset 4 is _not_ in place with patchset 6 being part of the tree. It would, however, be nice to pick the whole series instead and ensure that the functionality MHI introduces for boot-up sanity is in place for any controllers such as ath11k. Thanks, Bhaumik --- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-14 17:49 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-06 19:51 [PATCH v4 0/6] BHI/BHIe improvements for MHI power purposes Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-05-06 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] bus: mhi: core: Set BHI/BHIe offsets on power up preparation Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-05-21 13:36 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 2021-05-06 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] bus: mhi: core: Set BHI and BHIe pointers to NULL in clean-up Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-05-21 13:37 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 2021-05-06 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] bus: mhi: Add MMIO region length to controller structure Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-05-21 13:38 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 2021-05-06 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] ath11k: set register access length for MHI driver Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-05-21 13:51 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 2021-06-14 16:02 ` Kalle Valo 2021-06-14 17:49 ` Bhaumik Bhatt [this message] 2021-06-16 17:38 ` Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-06-18 6:45 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 2021-06-23 17:29 ` Kalle Valo 2021-06-24 6:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 2021-06-23 17:34 ` Kalle Valo 2021-06-23 21:33 ` Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-05-06 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] bus: mhi: pci_generic: Set " Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-05-21 13:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 2021-05-06 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] bus: mhi: core: Add range checks for BHI and BHIe Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-05-07 2:33 ` Hemant Kumar 2021-05-21 13:54 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 2021-06-25 5:28 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] BHI/BHIe improvements for MHI power purposes Manivannan Sadhasivam -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2021-05-06 19:32 Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-05-06 19:32 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] ath11k: set register access length for MHI driver Bhaumik Bhatt
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] ath11k: set register access length for MHI driver' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).