From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C61C352A3 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 15:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C85E20848 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 15:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=st.com header.i=@st.com header.b="PKySJ8G8" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728519AbgBKP5l (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 10:57:41 -0500 Received: from mx07-00178001.pphosted.com ([62.209.51.94]:19470 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728389AbgBKP5l (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 10:57:41 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0046037.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 01BFgiWh005066; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 16:57:24 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=st.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=STMicroelectronics; bh=bbFYX6l2oHqcB37HwIrG102ruoCSat6PEqciFlehfTo=; b=PKySJ8G8AbrJ4k583iDjQs5mLCntymoL0h/H00hNilX+pwgwuQ2Y3AM2dzjvJS4kEKof wBxUShCEKlPOAdYvT0452DmMw1ng8n4h3Ey9HKxwVYVoHS7i0vq5YJjaGQM29EzKMfSe otegXhwK+aJeZ5YCKBCW0OlkS94QYtBbrNzBEk9IAqCC0znPOihKq2852TEwpMu3UxO0 09yiRVJk7CfMny2D48ELea1BddTYrDxvAfSp+56dgCNXgxmhqC78b5AqSgUA3WIZ8Y0v mVnb2rdOAdOXi77/pkSBhz7PZTqFBFMl5NvtUiIgB+RzLYWOE+NnzeJnPTw8cupkUu0a zw== Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2y1urh6kvb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 16:57:24 +0100 Received: from euls16034.sgp.st.com (euls16034.sgp.st.com [10.75.44.20]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 9A09910003B; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 16:57:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (sfhdag3node1.st.com [10.75.127.7]) by euls16034.sgp.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 7B11D2C2801; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 16:57:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from lmecxl0889.lme.st.com (10.75.127.44) by SFHDAG3NODE1.st.com (10.75.127.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 16:57:18 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] remoteproc: Add elf64 support To: Clement Leger , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Bjorn Andersson , Jonathan Corbet , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , CC: Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , Andy Gross , Patrice Chotard , , , , , Loic PALLARDY , s-anna , Mathieu Poirier References: <527785289.2852303.1581062223707.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu> <20200210162209.23149-1-cleger@kalray.eu> From: Arnaud POULIQUEN Message-ID: <5b8045be-0942-2ecf-5dba-dad58071f6af@st.com> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 16:57:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200210162209.23149-1-cleger@kalray.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.75.127.44] X-ClientProxiedBy: SFHDAG8NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.23) To SFHDAG3NODE1.st.com (10.75.127.7) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-02-11_04:2020-02-10,2020-02-11 signatures=0 Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Hi Clement, I tested the series on the stm32 platform for remote proc firmwre load: no regression found. I do not test the da_to_va feature as not implemented on stm32 platform. Regards, Arnaud On 2/10/20 5:22 PM, Clement Leger wrote: > This serie add support for elf64 in remoteproc (elf loader, coredump). > First two patches modifies the type of len argument (in da_to_va) and > boot_addr in order to allow loading elf64 segment with a u64 size > and a u64 entry point. > Next patch introduce a set of macros to access elf64 and elf32 > transparently. > Last two patches are the actual modification in the elf loader and > remoteproc coredump support to add elf64 support. > > Changes from V3: > - Adapt coredump to elf64 file format > - Rename remoteproc_elf_loader.h to remoteproc_elf_helpers.h > - Update copyright year in remoteproc_elf_helpers.h > - Rename macros elf_hdr_* to elf_get_hdr_* for coherency with elf_hdr_set_* > - Split elf64 loader patch in 3: > - boot_addr u64 change > - remoteproc_elf_helpers.h creation > - elf64 loading > > Clement Leger (5): > remoteproc: Use u64 len for da_to_va > remoteproc: Use u64 type for boot_addr > remoteproc: Add elf helpers to access elf64 and elf32 fields > remoteproc: Add elf64 support in elf loader > remoteproc: Adapt coredump to generate correct elf type > > Documentation/remoteproc.txt | 2 +- > drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 11 +- > drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c | 4 +- > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c | 2 +- > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 2 +- > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 2 +- > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c | 2 +- > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c | 2 +- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 69 +++++++------ > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_helpers.h | 95 ++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++---------- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 4 +- > drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c | 2 +- > drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c | 4 +- > drivers/remoteproc/wkup_m3_rproc.c | 4 +- > include/linux/remoteproc.h | 7 +- > 16 files changed, 252 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_helpers.h >