From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>,
agross@kernel.org, david.brown@linaro.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, evgreen@chromium.org,
dianders@chromium.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org,
ilina@codeaurora.org, lsrao@codeaurora.org,
ulf.hansson@linaro.org, Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Add RSC power domain support
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:25:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d5451fe.1c69fb81.ee115.1711@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190813082442.25796-5-mkshah@codeaurora.org>
Quoting Maulik Shah (2019-08-13 01:24:42)
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> index e278fc11fe5c..bd8e9f1a43b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> @@ -498,6 +498,32 @@ static int tcs_ctrl_write(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * rpmh_rsc_ctrlr_is_idle: Check if any of the AMCs are busy.
> + *
> + * @drv: The controller
> + *
> + * Returns false if the TCSes are engaged in handling requests,
> + * True if controller is idle.
> + */
> +static bool rpmh_rsc_ctrlr_is_idle(struct rsc_drv *drv)
> +{
> + int m;
> + struct tcs_group *tcs = get_tcs_of_type(drv, ACTIVE_TCS);
> + bool ret = true;
> +
> + spin_lock(&drv->lock);
> + for (m = tcs->offset; m < tcs->offset + tcs->num_tcs; m++) {
> + if (!tcs_is_free(drv, m)) {
Isn't this a copy of an existing function in the rpmh driver?
> + ret = false;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&drv->lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * rpmh_rsc_write_ctrl_data: Write request to the controller
> *
> @@ -521,6 +547,65 @@ int rpmh_rsc_write_ctrl_data(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg)
> return tcs_ctrl_write(drv, msg);
> }
>
> +int rpmh_domain_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *rsc_pd)
> +{
> + struct rsc_drv *drv = container_of(rsc_pd, struct rsc_drv, rsc_pd);
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * RPMh domain can not be powered off when there is pending ACK for
> + * ACTIVE_TCS request. Exit when controller is busy.
> + */
> +
> + ret = rpmh_rsc_ctrlr_is_idle(drv);
> + if (!ret)
> + goto exit;
return 0? Shouldn't it return some negative value?
> +
> + ret = rpmh_flush(&drv->client);
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
Why not just return rpmh_flush(...)?
The usage of goto in this function is entirely unnecessary.
> +
> +exit:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmh_probe_power_domain(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct rsc_drv *drv)
> +{
> + int ret = -ENOMEM;
> + struct generic_pm_domain *rsc_pd = &drv->rsc_pd;
> + struct device_node *dn = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +
> + rsc_pd->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s", dn->name);
> + if (!rsc_pd->name)
> + goto exit;
return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + rsc_pd->name = kbasename(rsc_pd->name);
> + rsc_pd->power_off = rpmh_domain_power_off;
> + rsc_pd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_IRQ_SAFE;
> +
> + ret = pm_genpd_init(rsc_pd, NULL, false);
> + if (ret)
> + goto free_name;
> +
> + ret = of_genpd_add_provider_simple(dn, rsc_pd);
> + if (ret)
> + goto remove_pd;
> +
> + pr_debug("init PM domain %s\n", rsc_pd->name);
> +
> + return ret;
ret = of_genpd_add_provider_simple(...)
if (!ret)
return 0;
Drop the pr_debug(), it's not useful.
> +
> +remove_pd:
> + pm_genpd_remove(rsc_pd);
> +
> +free_name:
> + kfree(rsc_pd->name);
> +
> +exit:
> + return ret;
Please remove newlines between labels above.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-14 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-13 8:24 [PATCH 0/4] Add RSC power domain support Maulik Shah
2019-08-13 8:24 ` [PATCH 1/4] drivers: qcom: rpmh: fix macro to accept NULL argument Maulik Shah
2019-08-14 17:59 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-08-13 8:24 ` [PATCH 2/4] drivers: qcom: rpmh: remove rpmh_flush export Maulik Shah
2019-08-14 18:20 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-08-13 8:24 ` [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: Add RSC power domain specifier Maulik Shah
2019-08-14 18:02 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-08-13 8:24 ` [PATCH 4/4] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Add RSC power domain support Maulik Shah
2019-08-14 18:25 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2019-08-23 6:49 ` Maulik Shah
2019-08-14 18:19 ` [PATCH 0/4] " Stephen Boyd
2019-08-23 6:51 ` Maulik Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d5451fe.1c69fb81.ee115.1711@mx.google.com \
--to=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=david.brown@linaro.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
--cc=ilina@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsrao@codeaurora.org \
--cc=mkshah@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).