From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E9FC433E5 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:03:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D80206EB for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:03:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.b="UiBFZQWf" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727044AbgGXJDG (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 05:03:06 -0400 Received: from m43-7.mailgun.net ([69.72.43.7]:52318 "EHLO m43-7.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726845AbgGXJDF (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 05:03:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1595581384; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: Date: Message-ID: From: References: Cc: To: Subject: Sender; bh=Xc5yYihoFQKsI3WcXXnhfGRJQ4HmrBmbd0VVip4O/eI=; b=UiBFZQWfHIuJOeE1+qzPWILNGaVHjHe3nDdsVblpYx6llOe0yF4m7X5yD7/ZlWuN6ueEgLiG Zk/QJhNtvqHmK2CTP9kCaoJdb7wAAzIgBiYHGyJPwQ8ZoHnnhufefI2uddbqlAlk5JGoXOWr Bkf5YmZ+FAG3OI0DgFWMzIbAp+Q= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 69.72.43.7 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI1MzIzYiIsICJsaW51eC1hcm0tbXNtQHZnZXIua2VybmVsLm9yZyIsICJiZTllNGEiXQ== Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n19.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 5f1aa3c65b75bcda6030642b (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:03:02 GMT Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 51508C43395; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (unknown [61.3.19.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: rnayak) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B68CBC433C9; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:02:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org B68CBC433C9 Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rnayak@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add OPP tables and power-domains for venus To: Stanimir Varbanov , robh+dt@kernel.org, agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mka@chromium.org, Maulik Shah , Lina Iyer References: <1595503612-2901-1-git-send-email-rnayak@codeaurora.org> <1595503612-2901-5-git-send-email-rnayak@codeaurora.org> From: Rajendra Nayak Message-ID: <654e0fcb-ae4d-c151-fa8a-4d029fc823fb@codeaurora.org> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:32:55 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Hi Maulik/Lina, On 7/23/2020 11:36 PM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > Hi Rajendra, > > After applying 2,3 and 4/5 patches on linaro-integration v5.8-rc2 I see > below messages on db845: > > qcom-venus aa00000.video-codec: dev_pm_opp_set_rate: failed to find > current OPP for freq 533000097 (-34) > > ^^^ This one is new. > > qcom_rpmh TCS Busy, retrying RPMH message send: addr=0x30000 > > ^^^ and this message is annoying, can we make it pr_debug in rpmh? Would you be fine with moving this message to a pr_debug? Its currently a pr_info_ratelimited() thanks, Rajendra -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation