linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: Amey Narkhede <ameynarkhede03@gmail.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: qcom: Revert "iommu/arm: Cleanup resources in case of probe error path"
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 08:40:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <71106cbb-ff6d-02cb-7743-dfbd27bdaddf@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210705143054.nxy4ii6t6npj22ov@archlinux>

On 05.07.2021 16:30, Amey Narkhede wrote:
> On 21/07/05 08:56AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> QCOM IOMMU driver calls bus_set_iommu() for every IOMMU device controller,
>> what fails for the second and latter IOMMU devices. This is intended and
>> must be not fatal to the driver registration process. Also the cleanup
>> path should take care of the runtime PM state, what is missing in the
>> current patch. Revert relevant changes to the QCOM IOMMU driver until
>> a proper fix is prepared.
>>
> Apologies for the broken patch I don't have any arm machine to test the
> patches. Is this bug unique to qcom iommu?

Frankly, I have no idea. Just grep for bus_set_iommu() and check if the 
caller might be executed more than once.

Best regards

-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland


  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-06  6:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20210705065703eucas1p2e89258a2fc286896b755047e06f514cb@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2021-07-05  6:56 ` [PATCH] iommu: qcom: Revert "iommu/arm: Cleanup resources in case of probe error path" Marek Szyprowski
2021-07-05 14:30   ` Amey Narkhede
2021-07-06  6:40     ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2021-07-06 16:52   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-08 10:03   ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=71106cbb-ff6d-02cb-7743-dfbd27bdaddf@samsung.com \
    --to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=ameynarkhede03@gmail.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).