From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01619C433EF for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 06:59:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231773AbhLIHCx (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:02:53 -0500 Received: from m43-7.mailgun.net ([69.72.43.7]:44306 "EHLO m43-7.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231487AbhLIHCw (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:02:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1639033159; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: In-Reply-To: From: References: Cc: To: Subject: MIME-Version: Date: Message-ID: Sender; bh=q6yGD77D/zQJsU6gj2q3FDTAGA3akTjXyVBvtKiBUvE=; b=OaEXniSAE1piIXiioxlAqJ/GYStbHIDtAqR3p3OkXXOhfxfxG7EqrpxMSuuQf5GmcRAYAiG7 5ARuwRYXxsnxu6dlejmIhNSVbddiFhGK5Pcas90BjEyxONFz3YpOmWqHnEeWQwe0FvUUiIE8 3HkVhCym9C+Rberl+D9AzmM9VPg= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 69.72.43.7 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI1MzIzYiIsICJsaW51eC1hcm0tbXNtQHZnZXIua2VybmVsLm9yZyIsICJiZTllNGEiXQ== Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n02.prod.us-east-1.postgun.com with SMTP id 61b1a9471ff187c999811f41 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Thu, 09 Dec 2021 06:59:19 GMT Sender: quic_rjendra=quicinc.com@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B0E2BC43617; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 06:59:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [49.207.224.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: rnayak) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75C9AC4360D; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 06:59:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 smtp.codeaurora.org 75C9AC4360D Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com Message-ID: <7e9f6cbe-17c9-53ff-95a8-2f2bbdeb1d23@quicinc.com> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 12:29:12 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Remove mx/cx relationship on sc7280 Content-Language: en-US To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: agross@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, swboyd@chromium.org, mka@chromium.org References: <1638871712-18636-1-git-send-email-quic_rjendra@quicinc.com> <1638871712-18636-3-git-send-email-quic_rjendra@quicinc.com> From: Rajendra Nayak In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 12/9/2021 2:12 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Tue 07 Dec 04:08 CST 2021, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > >> While the requirement to specify the active + sleep and active-only MX >> power-domains as the parents of the corresponding CX power domains is >> applicable for most SoCs, we have some like the sc7280 where this >> dependency is not applicable. >> Define new rpmhpd structs for cx and cx_ao without the mx as >> parent and use them for sc7280. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak >> --- >> drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c >> index c71481d..4599efe 100644 >> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c >> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c >> @@ -120,6 +120,20 @@ static struct rpmhpd cx_ao = { >> .res_name = "cx.lvl", >> }; >> >> +static struct rpmhpd cx_ao_no_parent; >> +static struct rpmhpd cx_no_parent = { > > There are multiple variations of how each of these can be parented, but > only one way they can be without a parent. So how about we turn this the > other way around? > > I.e. let's name this one "cx" and the existing one "cx_w_mx_parent". > > > This will be particularly useful when you look at mmcx, which on > 8150/8180 has mx as parent and on 8450 has cx as parent. > > > PS. Unfortunately I had merged 8450 since you wrote this series, I tried > to just fix it up as I applied your patch, but noticed 8450_cx and > 8450_mmcx and wanted to get your opinion on this first. I agree that sounds like a reasonable thing to do, I hadn't looked at 8450 so did not notice it, I will rebase my patches on top and repost. > > Regards, > Bjorn > >> + .pd = { .name = "cx", }, >> + .peer = &cx_ao_no_parent, >> + .res_name = "cx.lvl", >> +}; >> + >> +static struct rpmhpd cx_ao_no_parent = { >> + .pd = { .name = "cx_ao", }, >> + .active_only = true, >> + .peer = &cx_no_parent, >> + .res_name = "cx.lvl", >> +}; >> + >> static struct rpmhpd mmcx_ao; >> static struct rpmhpd mmcx = { >> .pd = { .name = "mmcx", }, >> @@ -273,8 +287,8 @@ static const struct rpmhpd_desc sc7180_desc = { >> >> /* SC7280 RPMH powerdomains */ >> static struct rpmhpd *sc7280_rpmhpds[] = { >> - [SC7280_CX] = &cx, >> - [SC7280_CX_AO] = &cx_ao, >> + [SC7280_CX] = &cx_no_parent, >> + [SC7280_CX_AO] = &cx_ao_no_parent, >> [SC7280_EBI] = &ebi, >> [SC7280_GFX] = &gfx, >> [SC7280_MX] = &mx, >> -- >> 2.7.4 >>