linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: mike.leach@linaro.org
Cc: saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
	swboyd@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: dynamic-replicator: Fix handling of multiple connections
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:53:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <84918e7d-c933-3fa1-a61e-0615d4b3cf2c@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ9a7VgF3-Hdc7KSw9gVBeXSDHNguhqVhp60oK2XhCtr3DhDqg@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/27/2020 10:45 AM, Mike Leach wrote:
> HI,
> 
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 10:15, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 04/26/2020 03:37 PM, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>>> Since commit 30af4fb619e5 ("coresight: dynamic-replicator:
>>> Handle multiple connections"), we do not make sure that
>>> the other port is disabled when the dynamic replicator is
>>> enabled. This is seen to cause the CPU hardlockup atleast
>>> on SC7180 SoC with the following topology when enabling ETM
>>> with ETR as the sink via sysfs. Since there is no trace id
>>> logic in coresight yet to make use of multiple sinks in
>>> parallel for different trace sessions, disable the other
>>> port when one port is turned on.
>>>
>>>          etm0_out
>>>          |
>>>      apss_funnel_in0
>>>             |
>>>     apss_merge_funnel_in
>>>             |
>>>         funnel1_in4
>>>          |
>>>      merge_funnel_in1
>>>          |
>>>       swao_funnel_in
>>>             |
>>>           etf_in
>>>          |
>>>     swao_replicator_in
>>>             |
>>>      replicator_in
>>>          |
>>>           etr_in
>>>
>>>     Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0
>>>     CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Tainted: G S  B             5.4.25 #100
>>>     Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SC7180 IDP (DT)
>>>     Call trace:
>>>      dump_backtrace+0x0/0x188
>>>      show_stack+0x20/0x2c
>>>      dump_stack+0xdc/0x144
>>>      panic+0x168/0x370
>>>      arch_seccomp_spec_mitigate+0x0/0x14
>>>      watchdog_timer_fn+0x68/0x290
>>>      __hrtimer_run_queues+0x264/0x498
>>>      hrtimer_interrupt+0xf0/0x22c
>>>      arch_timer_handler_phys+0x40/0x50
>>>      handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x8c/0x158
>>>      __handle_domain_irq+0x84/0xc4
>>>      gic_handle_irq+0x100/0x1c4
>>>      el1_irq+0xbc/0x180
>>>      arch_cpu_idle+0x3c/0x5c
>>>      default_idle_call+0x1c/0x38
>>>      do_idle+0x100/0x280
>>>      cpu_startup_entry+0x24/0x28
>>>      secondary_start_kernel+0x15c/0x170
>>>     SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
>>> Tested-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>


>>
>> This is not sufficient. You must prevent another session trying to
>> enable the other port of the replicator as this could silently fail
>> the "on-going" session. Not ideal. Fail the attempt to enable a port
>> if the other port is active. You could track this in software and
>> fail early.
>>
>> Suzuki
> 
> While I have no issue in principle with not enabling a path to a sink
> that is not in use - indeed in some cases attaching to unused sinks
> can cause back-pressure that slows throughput (cf TPIU) - I am
> concerned that this modification is masking an underlying issue with
> the platform in question.
> 
> Should we decide to enable the diversion of different IDs to different
> sinks or allow different sessions go to different sinks, then this has
> potential to fail on the SC7180 SoC - and it will be difficult in
> future to associate a problem with this discussion.

Mike,

I think thats a good point.
Sai, please could we narrow down this to the real problem and may be
work around it for the "device" ? Do we know which sink is causing the
back pressure ? We could then push the "work around" to the replicator
it is connected to.

Suzuki

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-27 13:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-26 14:37 [PATCH] coresight: dynamic-replicator: Fix handling of multiple connections Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-27  9:20 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-27  9:45   ` Mike Leach
2020-04-27 13:53     ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2020-04-28 12:23       ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-29 11:47         ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-29 13:49           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-29 13:59             ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-29 14:27               ` Mike Leach
2020-04-29 14:48                 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-29 16:58                   ` Mike Leach
2020-04-29 17:11                     ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-05-06  7:35                       ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-05-08  8:53                         ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-05-11 11:14                           ` Mike Leach
2020-05-11 14:16                             ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-05-11 14:30                               ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-11 14:41                                 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-05-12 11:49                                   ` Mike Leach
2020-05-12 17:45                                     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-05-12 17:46                                     ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-05-12 21:52                                       ` Mike Leach
2020-05-13  1:49                                         ` Stephen Boyd
2020-05-13 15:45                                           ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-05-13 15:33                                         ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-05-16 10:04                                           ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-05-19  9:04                                             ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-05-11 14:34                               ` Sai Prakash Ranjan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=84918e7d-c933-3fa1-a61e-0615d4b3cf2c@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).