From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, swboyd@chromium.org,
ulf.hansson@linaro.org, dianders@chromium.org, rafael@kernel.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 00/11] DVFS in the OPP core
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 11:33:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85dbc630-f526-c06f-8a8b-9bbc3b794693@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190521062248.ogjetb2rwtqekflx@vireshk-i7>
On 5/21/2019 11:52 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 20-03-19, 15:19, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>> This is a v2 of the RFC posted earlier by Stephen Boyd [1]
>>
>> As part of v2 I still follow the same approach of dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
>> API using clk framework to round the frequency passed and making it
>> accept 0 as a valid frequency indicating the frequency isn't required
>> anymore. It just has a few more drivers converted to use this approach
>> like dsi/dpu and ufs.
>> ufs demonstrates the case of having to handle multiple power domains, one
>> of which is scalable.
>>
>> The patches are based on 5.1-rc1 and depend on some ufs fixes I posted
>> earlier [2] and a DT patch to include the rpmpd header [3]
>>
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/28/2086
>> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/8/70
>> [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/20/120
>
> Hi Rajendra,
>
> I am inclined to apply/push this series for 5.3-rc1, will it be
> possible for you to spend some time on this at priority ?
Hey Viresh, I was on vacation, just got back. I will refresh this series
and address your previous feedback, I haven't received much feedback for the
driver changes :/ but we can atleast review and get the OPP layer changes
finalized. thanks.
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-24 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-20 9:49 [RFC v2 00/11] DVFS in the OPP core Rajendra Nayak
2019-03-20 9:49 ` [RFC v2 01/11] OPP: Don't overwrite rounded clk rate Rajendra Nayak
2019-06-11 10:54 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-12 7:42 ` Rajendra Nayak
2019-06-12 8:25 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-13 9:54 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-14 5:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-17 3:50 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-17 4:07 ` Rajendra Nayak
2019-06-17 4:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-17 4:25 ` Rajendra Nayak
2019-06-14 5:54 ` Rajendra Nayak
2019-03-20 9:49 ` [RFC v2 02/11] OPP: Make dev_pm_opp_set_rate() with freq=0 as valid Rajendra Nayak
2019-06-14 6:32 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-17 4:04 ` Rajendra Nayak
2019-03-20 9:49 ` [RFC v2 03/11] tty: serial: qcom_geni_serial: Use OPP API to set clk/perf state Rajendra Nayak
2020-08-11 23:11 ` John Stultz
2020-08-12 1:33 ` John Stultz
2020-08-12 5:48 ` Rajendra Nayak
2020-08-12 7:35 ` Amit Pundir
2020-08-12 7:39 ` Rajendra Nayak
2020-08-12 9:26 ` Rajendra Nayak
2019-03-20 9:49 ` [RFC v2 04/11] spi: spi-geni-qcom: " Rajendra Nayak
2019-03-20 9:49 ` [RFC v2 05/11] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add OPP table for all qup devices Rajendra Nayak
2019-03-20 9:49 ` [RFC v2 06/11] scsi: ufs: Add support to manage multiple power domains in ufshcd-pltfrm Rajendra Nayak
2019-03-20 9:49 ` [RFC v2 07/11] scsi: ufs: Add support for specifying OPP tables in DT Rajendra Nayak
2019-03-20 9:49 ` [RFC v2 08/11] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add ufs opps and power-domains Rajendra Nayak
2019-05-14 7:53 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-03-20 9:49 ` [RFC v2 09/11] drm/msm/dpu: Use OPP API to set clk/perf state Rajendra Nayak
2019-04-10 3:49 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-04-10 3:49 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-03-20 9:49 ` [RFC v2 10/11] drm/msm: dsi: " Rajendra Nayak
2019-03-20 9:49 ` [RFC v2 11/11] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add DSI and MDP OPP tables and power-domains Rajendra Nayak
2019-04-10 3:51 ` [RFC v2 00/11] DVFS in the OPP core Viresh Kumar
2019-04-10 3:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-05-21 6:22 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-05-24 6:03 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2019-06-17 4:26 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85dbc630-f526-c06f-8a8b-9bbc3b794693@codeaurora.org \
--to=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).